Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

More documents

Recommendations

Info

254 C. Koeffel et al. Cognitive Ergonomics, HCII 2007, LNAI 4562, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. In. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. Callois R (1961) Man, play and games, Free Press of Glencoe, Illinois. Cheng K, Cairns PA (2005) Behaviour, realism and immersion in games. In: CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, 2–7 April 2005). CHI ’05, ACM, New York, pp. 1272–1275. Clarke D, Duimering PR (2006) How computer gamers experience the game situation: A behavioral study. ACM Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 4(3), July 2006. Cowley B, Charles D, Black M, Hickey R (2008) Toward an understanding of flow in videogames. ACM Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 6(2): 1–27, July 2008. Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Desurvire H, Caplan M, Toth JA (2004) Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In: CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria, 24–29 April 2004). CHI ’04, ACM, New York, pp. 1509–1512. Dewey J (1934) Art as Experience. Minton, Balch, New York. Dietz P, Leigh D (2001) DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida, 11–14 November 2001). UIST ’01, ACM, New York, pp. 219–226. Dumas J, Redish J (1999) A Practical Guide To Usability Testing. Intellect Books, Exeter. ESA (2008) Essential facts about the computer and videogame industry, 2008 sales, demographic and usage data. Entertainment Software Association, http://www.theesa.com/facts/ pdfs/ESA_EF_2008.pdf. Accessed 07 December 2008. Esposito N (2005) A short and simple definition of what a videogame is. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing: Views – Worlds in Play (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 16–20 June 2005) DiGRA’05, University of Vancouver, BC. Federoff MA (2002) Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in videogames. Master’s Thesis, Department of Telecommunications, Indiana University. Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (Cambridge, MA, 1–4 August 2004). DIS ’04, ACM, New York, pp. 261–268. Fullerton T, Swain C, Hoffman S (2004) Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games. CMP Books, San Francisco, CA. Hassenzahl M (2008) User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Keynote IHM, http://www.uni-landau.de/hassenzahl/pdfs/hassenzahl-ihm08.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2008. Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience – A research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology 25(2): 91–97, March–April 2006. Hazlett RL (2006) Measuring emotional valence during interactive experiences: Boys at videogame play. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, 22–27 April 2006). CHI ’06, ACM, New York, pp. 1023–1026. Huizinga J (1950) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston, MA. IJsselsteijn WA, Kort YAW de, Poels K, Jurgelionis A, Belotti F (2007) Characterising and measuring user experiences. In: Proceedings of the international Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Salzburg, Austria, 13–15 June 2007). ACE ’07, Vol. 203, ACM, New York. ISO 13407:1999 (1999) Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/ catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=21197. Accessed on 7 December 2008. Jegers K (2007) Pervasive game flow: Understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. ACM Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 5(1): 9, January 2007. Jegers K (2008) Investigating the applicability of usability and playability heuristics for evaluation of pervasive games. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Third International Conference on Internet
13 Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Overall User Experience 255 and Web Applications and Services (Athens, Greece, 8–13 June 2008). ICIW, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp. 656–661. Koeffel CA (2007) Heuristics for tabletop games. Master’s Thesis, Department of Digital Media, Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences Hagenberg. Koeffel C, Haller M (2008) Heuristics for the evaluation of tabletop games. In: Evaluating User Experiences in Games, Workshop at the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 5–10 April 2008). CHI ’08. Koivisto EMI, Korhonen H (2006) Mobile game playability heuristics. Forum Nokia. http://www.forum.nokia.com/. Accessed 07 December 2008. Kojima M, Sugimoto M, Nakamura A, Tomita M, Inami M, Nii H (2006) Augmented coliseum: An augmented game environment with small vehicles. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (Adelaide, Australia, 5–7 January 2006). TABLETOP, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp. 3–8. Larsen JM (2008) Evaluating user experience – How game reviewers do it. In: Evaluating User Experiences in Games, Workshop at the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 5–10 April 2008). CHI ’08. Law E, Roto V, Vermeeren AP, Kort J, Hassenzahl M (2008) Towards a shared definition of user experience. In: CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, 5–10 April 2008). CHI ’08, ACM, New York, pp. 2395–2398. Lee W, Woo W, Lee J (2005) TARBoard: Tangible augmented reality system for table-top game environment. In: PerGames2005 (Munich, Germany, 11 May 2005). PerGames ’05, ACM, New York. Loenen E van, Bergman T, Buil V, Gelder K van, Groten M, Hollemans G, Hoonhout J, Lashina T, Wijdeven S van de (2007) Entertaible: A solution for social gaming experiences. In: Tangible Play: Research and Design for Tangible and Tabletop Games, Workshop at the 2007 Intelligent User Interfaces Conference (Honolulu, HI, 28–31 January 2007) ACM, New York, pp. 16–19. Magerkurth C, Memisoglu M, Engelke T, Streitz N (2004) Towards the next generation of tabletop gaming experiences. In: Proceedings of Graphics interface 2004 (London, Ontario, Canada, 17–19 May 2004). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 62, Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, pp. 73–80. Malone TW (1980) What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: SIGSMALL ’80: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small systems (Palo Alto, CA, 18–19 September 1980) ACM, New York, pp. 162–169. Malone TW (1982) Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In: Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Gaithersburg, MD, 15–17 March 1982). ACM, New York, pp. 63–68. Mandryk RL, Atkins MS (2007) A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(4): 329–347, April 2007. Marsh T, Yang K, Shahabi C, Wong WL, Nocera L, Carriazo E, Varma A, Yoon H, Kyriakakis C (2005) Automating the detection of breaks in continuous user experience with computer games. In: CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, 2–7 April 2005). CHI ’05, ACM, New York, pp. 1629–1632. Medlock MC, Wixon D, Terrano M, Romero R, Fulton B (2002) Using the RITE Method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals Association, Orlando, FL. Morris MR, Piper AM, Cassanego A, Huang A, Paepcke A, Winograd T (2006) Mediating group dynamics through tabletop interface design. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 26 (5): 65–73. Nielsen J (1994) Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. Nielsen J, Mack RL (1994) Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Page 2 and 3:
Human-Computer Interaction Series E
Page 4 and 5:
Regina Bernhaupt Editor Evaluating
Page 6:
For Philippe
Page 9 and 10:
viii Foreword Chapter 3, Presence I
Page 11 and 12:
x Foreword personality which evolve
Page 14 and 15:
Contents Part I Introduction to Eva
Page 16 and 17:
Contributors Regina Bernhaupt IRIT,
Page 18:
Contributors xvii Manfred Tscheligi
Page 21 and 22:
xx About the Authors Emily Brown is
Page 23 and 24:
xxii About the Authors a post-docto
Page 25 and 26:
xxiv About the Authors Christina Ko
Page 27 and 28:
xxvi About the Authors MIT Media La
Page 29:
xxviii About the Authors Theft Auto
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 1 User Experience Evaluatio
Page 35 and 36:
1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 37:
1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 2 Enabling Social Play: A F
Page 43 and 44:
2 Enabling Social Play 13 It is als
Page 45 and 46:
2 Enabling Social Play 15 observati
Page 47 and 48:
2 Enabling Social Play 17 for playe
Page 49 and 50:
2 Enabling Social Play 19 to provid
Page 51 and 52:
2 Enabling Social Play 21 Colwell J
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3 Presence, Involvement, an
Page 55 and 56:
3 Presence, Involvement, and Flow i
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 4 Assessing the Core Elemen
Page 79 and 80:
4 Assessing the Core Elements of th
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101:
Page 104 and 105:
74 E. Brown (2005). Björk and Holo
Page 106 and 107:
76 E. Brown 5.2.3 How We Work Toget
Page 108 and 109:
78 E. Brown could be simulated on p
Page 110 and 111:
80 E. Brown 5.3.2 Pre-production At
Page 112 and 113:
82 E. Brown from the code. This is
Page 114 and 115:
84 E. Brown At this point, there is
Page 116 and 117:
86 E. Brown Game developers have be
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 6 Investigating Experiences
Page 121 and 122:
6 Investigating Experiences and Att
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135:
Page 138 and 139:
108 G. McAllister and G.R. White Th
Page 140 and 141:
110 G. McAllister and G.R. White su
Page 142 and 143:
112 G. McAllister and G.R. White of
Page 144 and 145:
114 G. McAllister and G.R. White te
Page 146 and 147:
116 G. McAllister and G.R. White qu
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
120 G. McAllister and G.R. White 7.
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
124 G. McAllister and G.R. White an
Page 156 and 157:
126 G. McAllister and G.R. White Al
Page 158 and 159:
128 G. McAllister and G.R. White Ne
Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 8 User Experience Design fo
Page 163 and 164:
8 User Experience Design for Inexpe
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177:
Page 180 and 181:
150 K. Poels et al. in games. This
Page 182 and 183:
152 K. Poels et al. their game char
Page 184 and 185:
154 K. Poels et al. If we apply thi
Page 186 and 187:
156 K. Poels et al. Participants ge
Page 188 and 189:
158 K. Poels et al. 9.3.2 Exploring
Page 190 and 191:
160 K. Poels et al. If our train is
Page 192 and 193:
162 K. Poels et al. would be intere
Page 195 and 196:
Chapter 10 Evaluating User Experien
Page 197 and 198:
10 Evaluating User Experience Facto
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
Page 217 and 218:
Chapter 11 Evaluating Exertion Game
Page 219 and 220:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 189 pr
Page 221 and 222:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 191 th
Page 223 and 224:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 193 to
Page 225 and 226:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 195 co
Page 227 and 228:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 197 11
Page 229 and 230:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 199 an
Page 231 and 232:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 201 11
Page 233 and 234: 11 Evaluating Exertion Games 203 to
Page 235 and 236: 11 Evaluating Exertion Games 205 Ac
Page 237: 11 Evaluating Exertion Games 207 Pa
Page 240 and 241: 210 M. Brown et al. challenges that
Page 242 and 243: 212 M. Brown et al. was also happen
Page 244 and 245: 214 M. Brown et al. Another importa
Page 246 and 247: 216 M. Brown et al. Albinsson and Z
Page 248 and 249: 218 M. Brown et al. asked to report
Page 250 and 251: 220 M. Brown et al. Table 12.2 Mean
Page 252 and 253: 222 M. Brown et al. Table 12.7 Cont
Page 254 and 255: 224 M. Brown et al. Table 12.9 Cont
Page 256 and 257: 226 M. Brown et al. Count 450 400 3
Page 258 and 259: 228 M. Brown et al. feedback. Thus,
Page 260 and 261: 230 M. Brown et al. Desurvivre H, C
Page 263 and 264: Chapter 13 Using Heuristics to Eval
Page 265 and 266: 13 Using Heuristics to Evaluate the
Page 283: 13 Using Heuristics to Evaluate the
Page 287 and 288: Index A Advanced interaction games,
show all

Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?