Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

More documents

Recommendations

Info

44 J. Takatalo et al. References Atkinson JW (1964) An Introduction to Motivation. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. Brennan L, Mavondo F (2000) Involvement: An unfinished story? In: Proceedings of ANZMAZ 2000, pp. 132–137. Brown E, Cairns P (2004) A grounded investigation of game immersion. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004, ACM Press, pp. 1297–1300. Counter-Strike: Source (2004). http://store.steampowered.com/app/240/. Accessed March 22, 2009. Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Davis JP, Steury K, Pagulayan R (2005) A survey method for assessing perceptions of a game: The consumer playtest in game design. Game Studies 5: 1. Della Fave A, Massimini F (1988) Modernization and the changing context of flow in work and leisure. In: Csikszentmihalyi I, Csikszentmihalyi M (ed) Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Ducheneaut N, Yee N, Nickell E, Moore RJ (2006) “Alone together?”: Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, ACM Press, New York, pp. 407–416. Ermi L, Mäyrä F (2005) Fundamental components of the game play Experience: Analysing immersion. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005. Fontaine G (1992) The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Enviroments 1: 482–490. Ghani JA, Deshpande SP (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in humancomputer interaction. Journal of Psychology 128: 381–391. Half-Life 2 (2004). http://www.half-life.com/overview.html. Accessed March 22, 2009. Hilgard ER (1980) The trilogy of mind: cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16: 107–117. Hunicke R, LeBlanc M, Zubek R (2004) MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In: Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI: 4. IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Poels K, Jurgelionis A, Bellotti F (2007) Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In: Proceedings of ACE 2007. ISO 9241-210:2008 (2008) Ergonomics of human system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). International Standardization Organization (ISO). James W (1890) The Principles of Psychology. H. Holt and Company, New York. Jennett C, Cox AL, Cairns P, Dhoparee S, Epps A, Tijs T, Walton A (2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 66: 641–661. Kim T, Biocca F (1997) Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2). Komulainen J, Takatalo J, Lehtonen M, Nyman G (2008) Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI 2008, ACM Press, New York, pp. 487–490. Lazarus RS (1991a) Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist 46: 352–367. Lazarus RS (1991b) Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist 46: 819–834. Lazzaro N (2004) Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. http:// www.xeodesign.com/whyweplaygames/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf. Accessed November 2007. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITCsense of presence inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Enviroments 10: 282–297.
3 Presence, Involvement, and Flow in Digital Games 45 Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 3: 2. Lombard M, Ditton TB, Crane D, Davis B (2000) Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. In: Proceedings of Presence 2000. Lubart TI, Getz I (1998) The influence of heuristics on psychological science: A case study of research on creativity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28: 435–457. Mayer JD (2001) Primary divisions of personality and their scientific contributions: From the trilogy-of-mind to the systems set. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31: 449–477. McMahan A (2003) Immersion, engagement and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In: Wolf MJP, Perron B (ed) The Video Game Theory Reader. Routledge, New York. McQuarrie EF, Munson JM (1992) A revised product involvement inventory: Improved usability and validity. Advances in Consumer Research 19: 108–115. Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Metacritic.com (2009). http://www.metacritic.com/games/. Accessed March 22, 2009. Nakatsu R, Rauterberg M, Vorderer P (2005) A new framework for entertainment computing: From passive to active experience. In: Proceedings of ICEC 2005, IFIP, pp. 1–12. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF (2000) Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science 19: 22–42. Pagulayan RJ, Keeker K, Wixon D, Romero RL, Fuller T (2003) User-centered design in games. In: JA Jacko and A Sears (eds) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Hillsdale. Pinchbeck D, Stevens B (2005) Schemata, narrative and presence. In: Proceedings of Presence 2005, pp. 221–226. Poels K, de Kort YAW, IJsselsteijnWA (2007) “It is always a lot of fun!” Exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In: Proceedings of Future Play 2007, pp. 83–89. Portal (2007). http://orange.half-life2.com/portal.html. Accessed March 22, 2009. Ryan R, Rigby C, Przybylski A (2006) The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation & Emotion 30: 344–360. Rettie R (2001) An exploration of flow during Internet use. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11: 103–113. Rothschild ML (1984) Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research 11: 216–217. Rust J, Golombok S (1999) Modern Psychometrics: The Science of Psychological Assessment. Routledge, London & New York. Särkelä H, Takatalo J, Komulainen J, Nyman G, Häkkinen J (2004) Attitudes to new technology and experiential dimensions of two different digital games. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004, ACM Press, New York, pp. 349–352. Schiefele U (1991) Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist 26: 299–323. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (2001) The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Enviroments 10: 266–281. Schuemie MJ, van der Straaten P, Krijn M, van der Mast CAPG (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4: 183–201. Sherry JL, Lucas K, Greenberg BS, Lachlan K (2006) Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In: Vorderer P, Bryant J (ed) Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahawa, NJ. Sweetser P, Johnson D (2004) Player-centred game environments: Assessing player opinions, experiences and issues. In: Proceedings of ICEC 2004, Springer, pp. 321–332. Sweetser P, Wyeth P (2005) GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment 3(3): Article 3a.
Page 2 and 3:
Human-Computer Interaction Series E
Page 4 and 5:
Regina Bernhaupt Editor Evaluating
Page 6:
For Philippe
Page 9 and 10:
viii Foreword Chapter 3, Presence I
Page 11 and 12:
x Foreword personality which evolve
Page 14 and 15:
Contents Part I Introduction to Eva
Page 16 and 17:
Contributors Regina Bernhaupt IRIT,
Page 18:
Contributors xvii Manfred Tscheligi
Page 21 and 22:
xx About the Authors Emily Brown is
Page 23 and 24: xxii About the Authors a post-docto
Page 25 and 26: xxiv About the Authors Christina Ko
Page 27 and 28: xxvi About the Authors MIT Media La
Page 29: xxviii About the Authors Theft Auto
Page 33 and 34: Chapter 1 User Experience Evaluatio
Page 35 and 36: 1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 37: 1 User Experience Evaluation in Ent
Page 41 and 42: Chapter 2 Enabling Social Play: A F
Page 43 and 44: 2 Enabling Social Play 13 It is als
Page 45 and 46: 2 Enabling Social Play 15 observati
Page 47 and 48: 2 Enabling Social Play 17 for playe
Page 49 and 50: 2 Enabling Social Play 19 to provid
Page 51 and 52: 2 Enabling Social Play 21 Colwell J
Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3 Presence, Involvement, an
Page 55 and 56: 3 Presence, Involvement, and Flow i
Page 73: 3 Presence, Involvement, and Flow i
Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 Assessing the Core Elemen
Page 79 and 80: 4 Assessing the Core Elements of th
Page 101: 4 Assessing the Core Elements of th
Page 104 and 105: 74 E. Brown (2005). Björk and Holo
Page 106 and 107: 76 E. Brown 5.2.3 How We Work Toget
Page 108 and 109: 78 E. Brown could be simulated on p
Page 110 and 111: 80 E. Brown 5.3.2 Pre-production At
Page 112 and 113: 82 E. Brown from the code. This is
Page 114 and 115: 84 E. Brown At this point, there is
Page 116 and 117: 86 E. Brown Game developers have be
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 6 Investigating Experiences
Page 121 and 122: 6 Investigating Experiences and Att
Page 123 and 124: 6 Investigating Experiences and Att
Page 125 and 126:
6 Investigating Experiences and Att
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135:
Page 138 and 139:
108 G. McAllister and G.R. White Th
Page 140 and 141:
110 G. McAllister and G.R. White su
Page 142 and 143:
112 G. McAllister and G.R. White of
Page 144 and 145:
114 G. McAllister and G.R. White te
Page 146 and 147:
116 G. McAllister and G.R. White qu
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
120 G. McAllister and G.R. White 7.
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
124 G. McAllister and G.R. White an
Page 156 and 157:
126 G. McAllister and G.R. White Al
Page 158 and 159:
128 G. McAllister and G.R. White Ne
Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 8 User Experience Design fo
Page 163 and 164:
8 User Experience Design for Inexpe
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177:
Page 180 and 181:
150 K. Poels et al. in games. This
Page 182 and 183:
152 K. Poels et al. their game char
Page 184 and 185:
154 K. Poels et al. If we apply thi
Page 186 and 187:
156 K. Poels et al. Participants ge
Page 188 and 189:
158 K. Poels et al. 9.3.2 Exploring
Page 190 and 191:
160 K. Poels et al. If our train is
Page 192 and 193:
162 K. Poels et al. would be intere
Page 195 and 196:
Chapter 10 Evaluating User Experien
Page 197 and 198:
10 Evaluating User Experience Facto
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
Page 217 and 218:
Chapter 11 Evaluating Exertion Game
Page 219 and 220:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 189 pr
Page 221 and 222:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 191 th
Page 223 and 224:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 193 to
Page 225 and 226:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 195 co
Page 227 and 228:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 197 11
Page 229 and 230:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 199 an
Page 231 and 232:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 201 11
Page 233 and 234:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 203 to
Page 235 and 236:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 205 Ac
Page 237:
11 Evaluating Exertion Games 207 Pa
Page 240 and 241:
210 M. Brown et al. challenges that
Page 242 and 243:
212 M. Brown et al. was also happen
Page 244 and 245:
214 M. Brown et al. Another importa
Page 246 and 247:
216 M. Brown et al. Albinsson and Z
Page 248 and 249:
218 M. Brown et al. asked to report
Page 250 and 251:
220 M. Brown et al. Table 12.2 Mean
Page 252 and 253:
222 M. Brown et al. Table 12.7 Cont
Page 254 and 255:
224 M. Brown et al. Table 12.9 Cont
Page 256 and 257:
226 M. Brown et al. Count 450 400 3
Page 258 and 259:
228 M. Brown et al. feedback. Thus,
Page 260 and 261:
230 M. Brown et al. Desurvivre H, C
Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 13 Using Heuristics to Eval
Page 265 and 266:
13 Using Heuristics to Evaluate the
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Index A Advanced interaction games,
show all

Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods - Lirmm

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?