15.08.2016 Views

Buddhist Romanticism

BuddhistRomanticism151003

BuddhistRomanticism151003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘mine.’” 53<br />

In terms of the Dhamma, Huxley has redefined “complete deliverance”<br />

to mean release only from a separative self-identity, and not from all forms<br />

of self-identity, separative or unitive. In practical terms, this is shown by his<br />

definition of the last factor of the path:<br />

“…eighth, Right Contemplation, the unitive knowledge of the<br />

Ground.” 54<br />

Here Huxley presents, as the goal of the practice, a revived version of a<br />

step that the Buddha included as part of the path to the goal. From the<br />

point of view of the Dhamma, only when one drops any perception of<br />

“Ground” and any identification with unitive knowledge—which, by<br />

nature, is fabricated—can one attain final release.<br />

From this discussion of Huxley’s treatment of Buddhism, two points are<br />

clear:<br />

1) To make Buddhism fit in with the perennial philosophy, he had to<br />

extensively rewrite it, at the same time criticizing the Buddha: The Buddha<br />

was unwise not to address metaphysical questions about the nature of the<br />

world and the self; his doctrines on not-self and nirvāṇa were incomplete,<br />

leading to a confusion that was cleared up only in the Mahāyāna. Whether<br />

Huxley was correct in making these criticisms, the fact that he had to revise<br />

the Buddha’s teaching so radically to make it fit into the perennial<br />

philosophy shows that the truth claim of that philosophy—that it is true<br />

because all great traditions agree with it—is bogus.<br />

2) From the point of view of the Dhamma, Huxley’s revised Buddhism is<br />

inferior to the original Dhamma in that it can lead not to the total cessation<br />

of becoming, but only to a refined level of becoming. Thus it cannot lead to<br />

total freedom from suffering and stress. And by asserting that differences<br />

among religious traditions don’t really matter, Huxley has obscured an<br />

important principle: that differences in belief do matter when they lead to<br />

differences in behavior. From this principle follows the Buddha’s teaching<br />

on how truth claims made by different teachings can be tested: not by<br />

agreement among views, but by the results that come when teachings are<br />

put into practice. In this way, too, Huxley has promoted an inferior version<br />

of the Dhamma, denying any possible way for religious truth claims to be<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!