15.08.2016 Views

Buddhist Romanticism

BuddhistRomanticism151003

BuddhistRomanticism151003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER SEVEN<br />

<strong>Buddhist</strong> <strong>Romanticism</strong><br />

<strong>Buddhist</strong> <strong>Romanticism</strong> is a result of a very natural human tendency:<br />

When presented with something foreign and new, people tend to see it in<br />

terms with which they already are familiar. Often they are totally unaware<br />

that they are doing this. If emotionally attached to their familiar way of<br />

viewing things, they will persist in holding to it even when shown that they<br />

are seeing only their own myths and projections, rather than what is<br />

actually there.<br />

In most areas of life, this tendency is rightly regarded as a form of<br />

blindness, something to be overcome. However, in the transmission of the<br />

Dhamma to the West, even when people are aware that they are reshaping<br />

the Dhamma as they study and teach it, the Romantic principle that religion<br />

is an art form—creating myths in an ever-changing dialogue with everchanging<br />

human needs—inclines them to regard this tendency as not only<br />

natural but also good. In extreme cases, they believe that there really is<br />

nothing “actually there.” In their eyes, the Dhamma itself is a body of<br />

myths, and they are doing it a favor by providing it with new myths in step<br />

with the times. There is very little recognition that something crucial and<br />

true is being lost.<br />

Granted, there are some points on which Romantic religion and the<br />

Dhamma agree. Both see religion as a means for curing a spiritual disease;<br />

both regard the mind as having an active, interactive role in the world,<br />

shaping the world as it is being shaped by the world; both focus on the<br />

phenomenology of experience—consciousness as it is directly sensed, from<br />

within, as a primary source of knowledge; and both reject a deterministic or<br />

mechanical view of causality in favor of a more interactive one. But these<br />

points of similarity disguise deeper differences that can be recognized only<br />

when the larger structural differences separating the Dhamma from<br />

Romantic religion are made clear.<br />

Those differences, in turn, will be acknowledged only when people can<br />

see that the Romantic viewpoint is actually getting in the way of their well-<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!