15.08.2016 Views

Buddhist Romanticism

BuddhistRomanticism151003

BuddhistRomanticism151003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not subject to changes in culture or human society, or even to the evolution<br />

or devolution of the cosmos as a whole. Thus the Buddha identified it as the<br />

essence of the teaching—the word “essence” (sāra) also meaning<br />

heartwood, the part of the tree that remains standing even when the less<br />

permanent parts of the tree die away (§11; §§39–41).<br />

Keeping the Path Open<br />

Although the Buddha did not class the path to release as part of the<br />

essence of the teaching, he did see the path as having a special relationship<br />

to the essence, just as the softwood of a tree is directly connected to the<br />

heartwood. In this way, the freedom of this release is the common taste of<br />

all his teachings (§41).<br />

One of the realizations that first occurs to a meditator upon the first taste<br />

of awakening is that there is no other path that can lead there, for the noble<br />

eightfold path is the only way by which the fabrications that stand in the<br />

way of release can be dismantled (§57). This is why the Buddha classed<br />

right view as a categorical teaching—true across the board—because it<br />

deals with mental processes in a way that transcends culture (§46).<br />

Another realization following on the first taste of awakening is that this<br />

path is not found outside the teachings of the Buddhas (§§55–56). Other<br />

religious teachings may contain elements of the noble eightfold path, such<br />

as the practice of virtue or strong concentration, but because they lack right<br />

view—and thus fail to ask the right questions that would induce total<br />

dispassion for even the subtlest levels of fabrication in the highest states of<br />

concentration—they remain stuck in states of becoming.<br />

The Buddha’s claims for the exceptional nature of his Dhamma did not<br />

spring from pride or ignorance. After all, as we have noted, he did not<br />

claim to have invented the Dhamma, or even to have been the first to find<br />

it. The path is not true because it is “his.” It’s true because it’s the only path<br />

that works in leading to full release.<br />

In this way, the Buddha’s authority is that, not of a creator god, but of an<br />

expert who has discovered and perfected a skill, and who wants to pass it<br />

on intact. And because this skill was not simply an education in<br />

understanding words, but a training of the entire character, he recognized<br />

that it had to be transmitted through friendship and frequent association<br />

with those who had already mastered those skills. In fact, he cited<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!