15.08.2016 Views

Buddhist Romanticism

BuddhistRomanticism151003

BuddhistRomanticism151003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

systems, these four thinkers wrote philosophy in the form of dialogues,<br />

letters, novels, myths, and aphorisms. This style of philosophy is called<br />

anti-foundationalism.<br />

Schelling, however, during the late 1790’s, was a foundationalist. He<br />

agreed that the most direct intuition of experience was that all Being is One,<br />

and that this experience could not be adequately expressed in a judgment.<br />

Still, he noted that even to say this much is to assume a great deal about<br />

experience. And for these assumptions to be persuasive, there was a need to<br />

show that they were consistent. To be consistent, he felt, they had to follow<br />

logically from a rational foundation. This was why, even though Schelling<br />

believed that philosophical systems couldn’t express everything, he saw a<br />

need to write philosophy in the traditional style: building systems—and he<br />

built many different systems during the late 1790’s—founded on the<br />

principle of A = A. Only in his later years did he become an antifoundationalist<br />

himself. Thus on this criterion, Schelling would count as a<br />

late Romantic philosopher, but not as an early one.<br />

However, there is another criterion for defining early Romantic<br />

philosophy, and that’s by its worldview. All five of these thinkers agreed that<br />

the universe is an infinite organic unity, and that human beings are integral<br />

parts of that unity. Because these thinkers also defined religion as an issue<br />

of the relationship of human beings to the universe, this seems the most<br />

relevant definition of Romantic philosophy when discussing Romantic<br />

religion. And because Schelling meets this criterion, he, too, deserves to be<br />

included in any discussion of early Romantic religious views.<br />

We will present the cultural reasons for why the Romantics developed<br />

this worldview and this understanding of religion in Chapters Three to<br />

Five. Here we will briefly sketch their biographies to give an idea of some<br />

of the personal reasons for the way they arrived at Romantic religion.<br />

We will start with Novalis first.<br />

Novalis (1772–1801)<br />

Georg Philipp Friedrich, Freiherr von Hardenberg, the only one of the early<br />

Romantics to come from a noble background, was born on the family estate<br />

in the Harz mountains to parents who were devout Pietists (see Chapter<br />

Three). He studied law in Jena, Leipzig, and Wittenberg. While at Jena, he<br />

read philosophy as well. This was during a period when one of the major<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!