15.08.2016 Views

Buddhist Romanticism

BuddhistRomanticism151003

BuddhistRomanticism151003

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

obeying the impulses of one’s nature, because the source of that nature was<br />

divine. But because one could not choose one’s nature, this meant that<br />

virtue had no freedom.<br />

Thus the retreat from his earlier position—that philosophy begins and<br />

ends in freedom—was complete. God may be free in the beginning and<br />

end, but human beings have no genuine freedom at any point in the<br />

timeline.<br />

As the book was being readied for publication, Caroline died. Many<br />

commentators have suggested that her death killed Schelling’s spark to<br />

keep on publishing. Nevertheless, he married again, in 1812, to one of<br />

Caroline’s friends, Pauline Gotter, and the two apparently had a calm and<br />

happy married life. At the same time, Schelling continued to teach and to<br />

develop his thoughts on philosophy. Although he wrote prolifically, he<br />

never published his writings—perhaps because his positions continued to<br />

evolve, perhaps because he sensed that Hegel was ready and eager to<br />

pounce on whatever he might put into print.<br />

The general thrust of his thought during this period was antifoundationalist.<br />

He came to see that the search for a first principle on which<br />

to base all philosophy was a big mistake; the fact that an idea may be<br />

coherent in the realm of thought doesn’t prove its truth in the realm of<br />

reality. Instead, he felt, religion and mythology were the true positive<br />

complements to the negative approach of logical and speculative<br />

philosophy. All truth, in his eyes, begins with the fact that God is free from<br />

all constraints, including the constraints of reason.<br />

Hegel, who had been lecturing to great acclaim at the University of<br />

Berlin, died suddenly in 1831. Nevertheless, his influence continued to<br />

dominate academic circles in Berlin. The king of Prussia, concerned about<br />

Hegel’s unorthodox views and their impact on the Prussian public,<br />

summoned Schelling to Berlin to lecture on philosophy and religion to help<br />

“stamp out the dragon-seed of Hegelian pantheism.” The fact that the king<br />

saw the fate of the Prussian state as resting on Schelling’s lecture series,<br />

which he delivered in 1841–42, gives an indication of the perceived<br />

importance of philosophy in Germany at the time.<br />

The lectures, however, were a failure. Schelling’s increasingly<br />

conservative views on God and philosophy were completely out of step<br />

with the times, and his close association with the powers that be, both in<br />

Bavaria and Prussia, gave the impression that he was little more than their<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!