14.12.2012 Views

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

z 0<br />

C 1<br />

D<br />

z 1<br />

C<br />

Figure 5.38 If f is analytic in D,<br />

integrals on C and C1 are equal.<br />

5.4 Independence of Path 265<br />

Note that � b<br />

f(x) dx depends only on the numbers a and b at the initial and terminal points<br />

a<br />

of the interval of integration. In contrast, the value of a real line integral �<br />

Pdx+ Qdy<br />

C<br />

generally depends on the curve C. However, there exist integrals �<br />

Pdx+ Qdy whose<br />

C<br />

value depends only on the initial point A and terminal point B of the curve C, and not<br />

on C itself. In this case we say that the line integral is independent of the path. For<br />

example, �<br />

ydx+ xdy is independent of the path. See Problems 19–22 in Exercises 5.1.<br />

C<br />

A line integral that is independent of the path can be evaluated in a manner similar to (1).<br />

It seems natural then to ask:<br />

Is there a complex version of the fundamental theorem of calculus?<br />

Can a contour integral �<br />

f(z) dz be independent of the path?<br />

C<br />

In this section we will see that the answer to both of these questions is yes.<br />

Path Independence The definition of path independence for a<br />

contour integral �<br />

�<br />

f(z) dz is essentially the same as for a real line integral<br />

C<br />

Pdx+ Qdy.<br />

C<br />

Definition 5.4 Independence of the Path<br />

Let z0 and z1 be points in a domain D. A contour integral �<br />

f(z) dz<br />

C<br />

is said to be independent of the path if its value is the same for all<br />

contours C in D with initial point z0 and terminal point z1.<br />

At the end of the preceding section we noted that the Cauchy-Goursat<br />

theoremalso holds for closed contours, not just simple closed contours, in a<br />

simply connected domain D. Now suppose, as shown in Figure 5.38, that C<br />

and C1 are two contours lying entirely in a simply connected domain D and<br />

both with initial point z0 and terminal point z1. Note that C joined with the<br />

opposite curve −C1 forms a closed contour. Thus, if f is analytic in D, it<br />

follows fromthe Cauchy-Goursat theoremthat<br />

�<br />

�<br />

f(z) dz + f(z) dz =0. (2)<br />

But (2) is equivalent to<br />

C<br />

�<br />

C<br />

−C1<br />

�<br />

f(z) dz =<br />

C1<br />

f(z) dz. (3)<br />

The result in (3) is also an example of the principle of deformation of contours<br />

introduced in (5) of Section 5.3. We summarize the last result as a theorem.<br />

Theorem 5.6 Analyticity Implies Path Independence<br />

Suppose that a function f is analytic in a simply connected domain<br />

D and C is any contour in D. Then �<br />

f(z) dz is independent of the<br />

C<br />

path C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!