14.12.2012 Views

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

406 Chapter 7 Conformal Mappings<br />

Recall, a circle is uniquely determined<br />

by three noncolinear points.<br />

☞<br />

method to construct a linear fractional transformation w = T (z), which maps<br />

three given distinct points z1, z2, and z3 on the boundaryof D to three given<br />

distinct points w1, w2, and w3 on the boundaryof D ′ . This is accomplished<br />

using the cross-ratio, which is defined as follows.<br />

Definition 7.3 Cross-Ratio<br />

The cross-ratio of the complex numbers z, z1, z2, and z3 is the complex<br />

number<br />

z − z1 z2 − z3<br />

. (11)<br />

z − z3 z2 − z1<br />

When computing a cross-ratio, we must be careful with the order of the<br />

complex numbers. For example, you should verify that the cross-ratio of 0, 1,<br />

i, and 2 is 3 1<br />

1 1<br />

4 + 4i, whereas the cross-ratio of 0, i, 1,and2is4 − 4i. We extend the concept of the cross-ratio to include points in the extended<br />

complex plane byusing the limit formula (24) from the Remarks in Section<br />

2.6. For example, the cross-ratio of, say, ∞, z1, z2, and z3 is given bythe<br />

limit<br />

z − z1 z2 − z3<br />

lim<br />

.<br />

z→∞z<br />

− z3 z2 − z1<br />

The following theorem illustrates the importance of cross-ratios in the studyof<br />

linear fractional transformations. In particular, we prove that the cross-ratio<br />

is invariant under a linear fractional transformation.<br />

Theorem 7.4 Cross-Ratios andLinear<br />

Fractional Transformations<br />

If w = T (z) is a linear fractional transformation that maps the distinct<br />

points z1, z2, and z3 onto the distinct points w1, w2, and w3, respectively,<br />

then<br />

z − z1 z2 − z3<br />

=<br />

z − z3 z2 − z1<br />

w − w1 w2 − w3<br />

(12)<br />

w − w3 w2 − w1<br />

for all z.<br />

Proof Let R be the linear fractional transformation<br />

z − z1 z2 − z3<br />

R(z) = ,<br />

z − z3 z2 − z1<br />

(13)<br />

and note that R(z1) =0,R(z2) = 1, and R(z3) =∞. Consider also the linear<br />

fractional transformation<br />

z − w1 w2 − w3<br />

S(z) = . (14)<br />

z − w3 w2 − w1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!