14.12.2012 Views

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

Complex Analysis - Maths KU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APP-4 Appendix II Proof of the Cauchy-Goursat Theorem<br />

Note<br />

☞<br />

7.2<br />

Appendix II Proof of the Cauchy-Goursat Theorem<br />

In Section 5.3 we proved Cauchy’s theorem using Green’s theorem. This simple<br />

proof was possible because of the hypothesis of continuity of f ′ throughout<br />

a simply connected domain D. The French mathematician Edouard Goursat<br />

(1858–1936) published a proof of Cauchy’s theorem in 1900 without this continuity<br />

assumption. As a result his name was thereafter linked with Cauchy’s<br />

in the title of one of the most fundamental of all theorems in complex analysis.<br />

In this appendix we discuss how the full proof of the Cauchy-Goursat<br />

theorem is accomplished. To avoid needless repetition throughout the following<br />

discussion we will take for granted that we are working in a simply<br />

connected domain D and that f represents a complex function analytic in D.<br />

The proof of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem is accomplished in three steps.<br />

The first two steps are helping theorems—sometimes called lemmas—which<br />

are actually special cases of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem. The first of these<br />

helping theorems deals with integrals along a triangular contour and the second<br />

deals with integrals along a closed polygonal contour. The first theorem is<br />

used in the proof of the second, and the second theorem is utilized to establish<br />

the Cauchy-Goursat theorem in its full generality.<br />

We will prove the first theorem, but because of its length, we will simply<br />

sketch the proofs of the remaining two.<br />

Theorem A.2 Triangular Contour<br />

If ∆ is a triangular contour lying entirely within D, then �<br />

∆<br />

f(z) dz =0.<br />

Proof Let ∆ be the triangular contour shown in Figure AII.1; the vertices<br />

of ∆ are labeled A, B, and C. We form four smaller triangles C1, C2, C3,<br />

and C4 by joining the midpoints E, F , and G of the sides of ∆ by straight line<br />

∆<br />

B C<br />

Figure AII.1 Triangular contour<br />

∆ within D<br />

A<br />

C 1<br />

∆<br />

C 4<br />

B F<br />

C<br />

A<br />

C 3<br />

E G<br />

C 2<br />

Figure AII.2 Triangular contours<br />

C1, C2, C3, and C4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!