15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1 - Deficit containment or costcontainment?<br />

The politics of health care<br />

expenditures in France<br />

de Pouvourville G. 1<br />

Like many other comparable developed countries, French governments have been struggling<br />

for the past 30 years to contain health expenditures growth rate to a sustainable<br />

level, considering the growth rate of the economy. If the goal of public policies has always<br />

been to achieve a balance between resources and expenditures, GDP growth and health<br />

care expenditures, then they have permanently failed. The share of overall National<br />

Health Expenditures in the GDP was of 8,1% in 1980, 9,3% in 1990, 9,91% in 2000 and<br />

11,14% in 2005. Thus, expenditures have always been growing faster than the national<br />

wealth. Since 1997, the Parliament sets every year an official rate of increase for Sickness<br />

Fund Expenditures. In 1997, expenditures increased 1,5% whereas the objective was<br />

1,7%. Since then, expenditures have been increasing on average 1,7 times as fast as the<br />

objective, with a high of 2,6 times in 1999. As a consequence, the deficits of the General<br />

Sickness Fund, which covers 90% of the population, are quasi-permanent (see Figure 1).<br />

Figure 1 - National Sickness Fund-Annual Balance - Millions of €<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

-1000<br />

-2000<br />

-3000<br />

-4000<br />

-5000<br />

-6000<br />

-7000<br />

-8000<br />

-9000<br />

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005<br />

National Sickness Fund-Annual Balance Millions of €<br />

1 Senior Research Director INSERM/CNRS, France.<br />

Eco- Santé 2006<br />

[119]<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!