Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.6 - Deficit in the Argentina national health<br />
scheme and analysis of coverage tools<br />
Levcovich M., San Martin M., Schweiger A.<br />
2.6.1 Introduction<br />
The objective of the present study is to point out the health insurance coverage inequalities<br />
and the funding of distinct subsections of the Argentinean health scheme.<br />
To this effect, the principal characteristics of each subsection are described (social insurance,<br />
private and public sector) using per capita expenditure, insured citizens and the<br />
body of guaranteed services as reference points.<br />
Once the per capita expenditure of each subsection was determined, we carried out a<br />
comparison between the expenses necessary for covering the entire basket of services<br />
and the financial coverage possibilities for each subsection. Once a deficit arose, we<br />
went on to analyze the instruments used to solve the problem.<br />
2.6.2 Characteristics of the Argentinean health system<br />
The Argentinean healthcare system is generally considered as a very fragmented, heterogeneous<br />
and scarcely equitable one in its organizational and financial aspects and its accessibility<br />
to healthcare services 1 . The consequences of these characteristics may be observed in<br />
the differences presented by population health status indexes 2 .<br />
Some studies 3 state that it is not fair to speak of a “healthcare scheme” considering the lack<br />
of coordination between the parties that constitute its organization. But beyond semantics,<br />
it is clear that the lack of coordination and organization hinders the efficient use of resources<br />
and acceptable degrees of fairness. The lack of integration between the distinct subsections<br />
(public, social welfare, private) is evident, but a high degree of fragmentation is also evident<br />
within the same. The public sector contributes to this overall situation by a division according<br />
to jurisdictions (national, provincial and municipal) that are not coordinated with each<br />
other.<br />
The present organization of the Health System is the result of a question that goes beyond<br />
the dynamics of its own sector. Public subsections, Social Welfare and the private sector are<br />
in charge of healthcare goods and services. The national point (Ministry of Health) are<br />
responsible for administering the system on the whole, through regulations and programmes.<br />
However, due to the federal structure of the country, provincial governments possess<br />
a certain degree of independence on the matter of healthcare policies, which require definition<br />
of agreements between the State and Regions. The outcome is that provincial govern-<br />
1 Post-lauream in Salute Sociale e Comunitaria. Modulo 5. Politiche di Salute. Ministry of Health and Environment, 2005.<br />
2 Basic indexes Ministry of Health – OPS/OMS (Year 2005). www.msal.gov.ar.<br />
3 See Cetrángolo and Devoto 2002.<br />
[145]<br />
CEIS Health Report 2006