15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.6 - Deficit in the Argentina national health<br />

scheme and analysis of coverage tools<br />

Levcovich M., San Martin M., Schweiger A.<br />

2.6.1 Introduction<br />

The objective of the present study is to point out the health insurance coverage inequalities<br />

and the funding of distinct subsections of the Argentinean health scheme.<br />

To this effect, the principal characteristics of each subsection are described (social insurance,<br />

private and public sector) using per capita expenditure, insured citizens and the<br />

body of guaranteed services as reference points.<br />

Once the per capita expenditure of each subsection was determined, we carried out a<br />

comparison between the expenses necessary for covering the entire basket of services<br />

and the financial coverage possibilities for each subsection. Once a deficit arose, we<br />

went on to analyze the instruments used to solve the problem.<br />

2.6.2 Characteristics of the Argentinean health system<br />

The Argentinean healthcare system is generally considered as a very fragmented, heterogeneous<br />

and scarcely equitable one in its organizational and financial aspects and its accessibility<br />

to healthcare services 1 . The consequences of these characteristics may be observed in<br />

the differences presented by population health status indexes 2 .<br />

Some studies 3 state that it is not fair to speak of a “healthcare scheme” considering the lack<br />

of coordination between the parties that constitute its organization. But beyond semantics,<br />

it is clear that the lack of coordination and organization hinders the efficient use of resources<br />

and acceptable degrees of fairness. The lack of integration between the distinct subsections<br />

(public, social welfare, private) is evident, but a high degree of fragmentation is also evident<br />

within the same. The public sector contributes to this overall situation by a division according<br />

to jurisdictions (national, provincial and municipal) that are not coordinated with each<br />

other.<br />

The present organization of the Health System is the result of a question that goes beyond<br />

the dynamics of its own sector. Public subsections, Social Welfare and the private sector are<br />

in charge of healthcare goods and services. The national point (Ministry of Health) are<br />

responsible for administering the system on the whole, through regulations and programmes.<br />

However, due to the federal structure of the country, provincial governments possess<br />

a certain degree of independence on the matter of healthcare policies, which require definition<br />

of agreements between the State and Regions. The outcome is that provincial govern-<br />

1 Post-lauream in Salute Sociale e Comunitaria. Modulo 5. Politiche di Salute. Ministry of Health and Environment, 2005.<br />

2 Basic indexes Ministry of Health – OPS/OMS (Year 2005). www.msal.gov.ar.<br />

3 See Cetrángolo and Devoto 2002.<br />

[145]<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!