15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CEIS Health Report 2006<br />

tures. Besides, our data demonstrates that dental care also plays an important role for<br />

households that can afford it (namely households in the second standardized consumption<br />

quintile).<br />

We can formulate the same argument for long-term care (LTC).<br />

Table 8 shows the out of pocket health expenditure composition for households subject<br />

to catastrophic expenditures. It can give some information about the consumption behaviour<br />

of those households (which are forced or freely choose) to use a great part of their<br />

resources for healthcare. Analysis has to take into consideration consumption standardized<br />

quintiles.<br />

The largest part of the expenditures (households in 3rd quintile) refer to dental care<br />

(28,9%), LTC (26,7%) and drugs (23,6%). A similar observation can be made for the 4th<br />

and 5th quintiles: the only difference is that dental care assumes a leading role.<br />

Table 8 – Composition of out of pocket health expenditures<br />

by standardized consumption quintiles – Cata households – Italy 2004<br />

Quintile 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Hospital 0,3% 0,9% 0,7% 4,9% 9,4%<br />

Specialist care 12,8% 16,8% 6,7% 3,7% 2,2%<br />

Dental care 7,2% 16,8% 28,9% 43,4% 57,9%<br />

Analysis 6,3% 6,7% 5% 3,9% 0,5%<br />

Apparatus and prothesis 5,3% 9,1% 8,3% 4% 7,4%<br />

Thermal care 0,0% 0,1% 0,0% 0,7% 2,2%<br />

Pharmaceutical treatment 61,9% 32,5% 23,6% 8,3% 4,3%<br />

Disability and auxiliary services 6,1% 17% 26,7% 31% 16,0%<br />

Source: Our elaboration ISTAT data<br />

4.1.6 Regional distribution of impoverishment and catastrophic payments<br />

Neither impoverishment nor catastrophic payments are uniformly distributed over the<br />

entire territory (Table 9).<br />

Southern Regions have a higher incidence of both poverty and impoverishment: since<br />

poor households are not included into impoverishment analysis, we may conclude that<br />

the inefficacy of the National Health Scheme in protecting households from economic<br />

risk related to illnesses, contribute to the increase of actual household poverty (obtained<br />

by summing poor and impoor) and consequently to an increase of the inequality between<br />

northern and southern Regions.<br />

Most of the northern Regions have an impoverishment incidence that is lower than the<br />

italian average. The only exception is Liguria, where population income over the average,<br />

is not sufficient to overcome the effect of the greater amount of elderly people, thus<br />

confirming the higher risk for elderly people.<br />

[236]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!