15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5 – Health expenditure by source of funding (2004)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

2<br />

7<br />

90<br />

Lussemburgo**<br />

10<br />

89<br />

Rep. Ceca**<br />

system ought to guarantee, on the size of the contribution required to expenditure 10 and<br />

on the role played by the different forms of private health insurance (the size of the insurance<br />

market) 11 .<br />

In any case, public financing is the dominant formula in the group of OECD countries<br />

(Figure 5) though there has been a slight fall since 2002. The public proportion is still<br />

above 80,0% in many countries. Italy remains slightly below the OECD average with a<br />

public sector proportion close to 76,5%, which is practically the same as recorded in the<br />

previous ten years.<br />

In Italy private expenditure by families accounts for about one fifth of the total. However,<br />

it is important to note that almost all (about 83,0%) of private financing in our country is<br />

“out-of-pocket”, which is one of the highest figures among the most industrialised countries<br />

and those of “old Europe”, exceeded only by Greece, Iceland, the Czech Republic<br />

and Norway. It is therefore interesting to note that “out-of-pocket” expenditure accounted<br />

for an average of 19,8% of total health expenditure in 2004 12 , and about 76,0% 13 of<br />

10 In Italy, “co-payment” has risen during the years examined in this study.<br />

11 See OECD (2003) and Docteur et al. (2003).<br />

12 The mean does not include Sweden and the United Kingdom, for which the data are not available. For Slovakia, Germany, Japan<br />

and Belgium, the data available refer to 2003 and for Australia to 2002 (OECD, 2006).<br />

13 The mean does not include Australia, Denmark, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Sweden because of the incompleteness<br />

of the information.<br />

12<br />

88<br />

Slovacchia*<br />

16<br />

84<br />

Norvegia<br />

17<br />

83<br />

Islanda**<br />

17<br />

82<br />

Giappone*,**<br />

14<br />

80<br />

Irlanda<br />

Source: OECD Health Data 2006, June 2006<br />

8 12<br />

78<br />

Francia**<br />

Public Expenditure on Health<br />

Out-of-pocket payments<br />

10 9<br />

78<br />

Germania*<br />

17 5<br />

77<br />

Nuova Zelanda<br />

19 2<br />

77<br />

Finlandia<br />

20<br />

76<br />

Italia<br />

24<br />

73<br />

Ungheria**<br />

19<br />

72<br />

Turchia<br />

72 22 5<br />

Portogallo**<br />

71 24 3<br />

Belgio*,**<br />

[47]<br />

71 24 5<br />

Spagna**<br />

Private Health Insurance<br />

Other<br />

15 9<br />

71<br />

Austria<br />

15 13<br />

70<br />

Canada**<br />

28<br />

69<br />

Polonia<br />

9<br />

32<br />

58<br />

Svizzera**<br />

53 45<br />

2<br />

Grecia<br />

51 37<br />

4<br />

Corea<br />

46 51<br />

3<br />

Messico<br />

13 37<br />

45<br />

Stati Uniti<br />

* 2003 ** Forecast<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!