Chapter 2

More documents

Recommendations

Info

● OECD (2004), “Towards High - Performing Health Systems: The OECD Health Project”. ● OECD (2004), “Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries: The Benefits and Costs for Individuals and Health Systems – Health Working Papers. ● OECD (2005), “Health Data”. ● R.I.B. (2002), “L’industria delle assicurazioni ed il mondo della sanità che cambia” in Atti del 9° Convegno. [227] CEIS Health Report 2006
Page 1 and 2:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Management
Page 3 and 4:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Management
Page 6 and 7:
Index Report Presentation by Pagane
Page 8 and 9:
1.6 - The Regional Primary Care Agr
Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 3 - Efficiency 3.1 - The Ef
Page 12 and 13:
3.8 - Private Health Insurance and
Page 14:
Ceis - Sanità Report presentation
Page 17 and 18:
Warning The figures in the volume f
Page 19 and 20:
CEIS Health Report 2006 stantial, i
Page 21 and 22:
CEIS Health Report 2006 If, therefo
Page 23 and 24:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Cross-check
Page 25 and 26:
CEIS Health Report 2006 over € 6.
Page 27 and 28:
CEIS Health Report 2006 made; final
Page 29 and 30:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Although th
Page 31 and 32:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Aside from
Page 33 and 34:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Regulations
Page 35 and 36:
CEIS Health Report 2006 especially
Page 38:
Chapter 1 Health expenditure and fu
Page 41 and 42:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The questio
Page 43 and 44:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 1 - T
Page 45 and 46:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 3 -
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ciated with
Page 55 and 56:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ● OECD (2
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
CEIS Health Report 2006 the phenome
Page 61 and 62:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 3 - R
Page 63 and 64:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The indicat
Page 65 and 66:
CEIS Health Report 2006 References
Page 67 and 68:
CEIS Health Report 2006 All the var
Page 69 and 70:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Diagram 1 -
Page 71 and 72:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.4 - Pharm
Page 73 and 74:
CEIS Health Report 2006 % Pharmaceu
Page 75 and 76:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The second
Page 77 and 78:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tion of res
Page 79 and 80:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 4 - R
Page 81 and 82:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The variati
Page 83 and 84:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.5 - The r
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
CEIS Health Report 2006 southern Re
Page 89 and 90:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.5.5 Absor
Page 91 and 92:
CEIS Health Report 2006 For day hos
Page 93 and 94:
CEIS Health Report 2006 There is co
Page 95 and 96:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.6 - The r
Page 97 and 98:
CEIS Health Report 2006 the Primary
Page 99 and 100:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 1 - T
Page 101 and 102:
CEIS Health Report 2006 • “phys
Page 103 and 104:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.7 - Evolu
Page 105 and 106:
CEIS Health Report 2006 As can be o
Page 107 and 108:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Another int
Page 109 and 110:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Some signif
Page 111 and 112:
CEIS Health Report 2006 1.7.5 Concl
Page 113 and 114:
CEIS Health Report 2006 [114]
Page 116:
Introduction Public deficit in the
Page 119 and 120:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The cumulat
Page 121 and 122:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tegies of i
Page 123 and 124:
CEIS Health Report 2006 gest that t
Page 125 and 126:
CEIS Health Report 2006 increase of
Page 127 and 128:
CEIS Health Report 2006 increase in
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
CEIS Health Report 2006 It is also
Page 133 and 134:
CEIS Health Report 2006 shifting be
Page 135 and 136:
CEIS Health Report 2006 year (AIHW
Page 137 and 138:
CEIS Health Report 2006 cost of the
Page 139 and 140:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The Second
Page 141 and 142:
CEIS Health Report 2006 2.5 - Imple
Page 143 and 144:
CEIS Health Report 2006 2.5.3 Shift
Page 145 and 146:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 1 - P
Page 147 and 148:
CEIS Health Report 2006 and, conseq
Page 149 and 150:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Grant whose
Page 151 and 152:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Generally s
Page 153 and 154:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Scheme for
Page 156 and 157:
3.1 - The efficiency of Regional He
Page 158 and 159:
Table 2 - LEA Financing REGIONS HOS
Page 160 and 161:
• Campania, with strong financial
Page 162 and 163:
[163] CEIS Health Report 2006
Page 164 and 165:
hospital stays has reduced the aver
Page 166 and 167:
treated varies greatly. The highest
Page 168 and 169:
CMS = f(COST, CMP, PL, RC, DM , PME
Page 170 and 171:
formance, implying an increase in a
Page 172 and 173:
3.3 - The National Health System Ev
Page 174 and 175:
3.3.3 Cooperation with the Regional
Page 176 and 177: the contract conditions are previou
Page 178 and 179: Consequentially, in order to avoid
Page 180 and 181: order through the MEPA) numbered 14
Page 182 and 183: 3.4 - Strengthening the capacity fo
Page 184 and 185: for designing and governing organiz
Page 186 and 187: the hierarchical and management rol
Page 188 and 189: tions may appear and disappear, the
Page 190 and 191: lop, rather than a variable to be c
Page 192 and 193: units along business lines were unq
Page 194 and 195: cooperation to achieve the developm
Page 196 and 197: However, to manage a multi-site hos
Page 198 and 199: Figure 2 - AVS Strategy map • con
Page 200 and 201: cialties, but what sets them apart,
Page 202 and 203: nistically or quantitatively. Hence
Page 204 and 205: portant for healthcare industry, as
Page 206 and 207: tor is that General Managers usuall
Page 208 and 209: cation of the ABC and, in general,
Page 210 and 211: ● Kaplan R, Norton D (1992), “T
Page 212 and 213: 3.7 - The management of healthcare
Page 214 and 215: Table 1 - Pathway for st elevated a
Page 216 and 217: [217] CEIS Health Report 2006 Table
Page 218 and 219: Vaginal childbirth Some synthesis i
Page 220 and 221: Politiche sanitarie, marzo-aprile.
Page 222 and 223: dental work, the purchase or rental
Page 224 and 225: 2. We might suppose that the state
Page 228: Chapter 4 Equity
Page 231 and 232: CEIS Health Report 2006 of catastro
Page 233 and 234: CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 4 - D
Page 235 and 236: CEIS Health Report 2006 tures. Besi
Page 237 and 238: CEIS Health Report 2006 4.1.7 Distr
Page 239 and 240: CEIS Health Report 2006 Along with
Page 242 and 243: 4.2 - Access equity Rocchetti I. 1
Page 244 and 245: with 4.2.3 Advantages and disadvant
Page 246 and 247: variability that cannot be explaine
Page 248 and 249: Also in this case the estimates are
Page 250: Chapter 5 Outcomes (quality, effect
Page 253 and 254: CEIS Health Report 2006 at death tr
Page 255 and 256: CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 4 -
Page 257 and 258: CEIS Health Report 2006 Southern Re
Page 259 and 260: CEIS Health Report 2006 Rutstein’
Page 261 and 262: CEIS Health Report 2006 5.2.3 Resul
Page 263 and 264: CEIS Health Report 2006 Diagram 2 -
Page 265 and 266: CEIS Health Report 2006 Diagram 6 -
Page 267 and 268: CEIS Health Report 2006 worrisome r
Page 269 and 270: CEIS Health Report 2006 5.3 - The p
Page 271 and 272: CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 2 -
Page 273 and 274: CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 2 - U
Page 275 and 276: CEIS Health Report 2006 Box 1: Iden
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
CEIS Health Report 2006 nence; infu
Page 281 and 282:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tribution g
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
CEIS Health Report 2006 • retired
Page 287 and 288:
CEIS Health Report 2006 European in
Page 289 and 290:
CEIS Health Report 2006 better trea
Page 291 and 292:
CEIS Health Report 2006 offered by
Page 293 and 294:
CEIS Health Report 2006 strict meas
Page 295 and 296:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Authors Cur
Page 297 and 298:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ✔ GABELLI
Page 299 and 300:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ✔ RATTI M
show all

Chapter 2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?