Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CEIS Health Report 2006<br />
year (AIHW 2006). In this case, the trade off is between Federal government outlays in<br />
health care expenditure and lower income tax revenue. In view of the flat nature of the<br />
copayments and the progressive nature of income taxation, this approach also raises<br />
equity questions.<br />
2.3.8 Conclusion<br />
In the post-war period, public concerns with health care has been translated into larger<br />
public subsidies of health services allowed by substantial rises in per capita income and<br />
government revenue. However, growth in health expenditures above the GDP average,<br />
fiscal constraints imposed by economic cyclical shocks and new fiscal orthodoxy have<br />
led governments to adopt policies to reign in growing public subsidies. However, trends<br />
have varied among OECD countries. In the case of Australia, public funding of health<br />
care has grown but its share of the total growing expenditure has remained stable in the<br />
last decade. Government in Australia has used both command-control and market-oriented<br />
policies to contain total public expenditure on health services. However, there have<br />
been substantial increases in public subsidies for private hospitals and pharmaceuticals.<br />
The first was the result of a deliberate policy to increase the use of private hospitals, while<br />
the second has been the result of growing use of drugs and increase in their prices. In<br />
spite of the use of expenditure thresholds that attract increasing rebates and or income<br />
tax concessions, some features of policies aimed at containing public outlays on health<br />
services raise both efficiency and equity issues.<br />
References<br />
● Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2000. “Household Expenditure Survey, detailed<br />
expenditure items, 1998-99”. Catalogue No. 6535.0., Canberra.<br />
● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2002. “Health expenditure Australia<br />
2000-01”, Canberra.<br />
● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2005. “Health expenditure Australia<br />
2003-04”, Canberra.<br />
● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2006. “Australia’s Health 2006”,<br />
Canberra.<br />
● Maddison, Angus (2003). “The World Economy: Historical Statistics”, Organisation for<br />
Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.<br />
● Martins JM (2002). “Who is winning? The drug companies, the Government or the<br />
Battlers?” www.achse.org.au/publications/martins/drug.html accessed 17/03/2006.<br />
● Martins JM (2004). “Health Financing – An International Perspective”. In Courtney M,<br />
Briggs D (Editors) Health Care Financial Management, Elsevier Mosby, Sydney.<br />
● Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). “Health Data<br />
2006”. www.OECD, accessed 25 July 2006.<br />
[136]