15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CEIS Health Report 2006<br />

year (AIHW 2006). In this case, the trade off is between Federal government outlays in<br />

health care expenditure and lower income tax revenue. In view of the flat nature of the<br />

copayments and the progressive nature of income taxation, this approach also raises<br />

equity questions.<br />

2.3.8 Conclusion<br />

In the post-war period, public concerns with health care has been translated into larger<br />

public subsidies of health services allowed by substantial rises in per capita income and<br />

government revenue. However, growth in health expenditures above the GDP average,<br />

fiscal constraints imposed by economic cyclical shocks and new fiscal orthodoxy have<br />

led governments to adopt policies to reign in growing public subsidies. However, trends<br />

have varied among OECD countries. In the case of Australia, public funding of health<br />

care has grown but its share of the total growing expenditure has remained stable in the<br />

last decade. Government in Australia has used both command-control and market-oriented<br />

policies to contain total public expenditure on health services. However, there have<br />

been substantial increases in public subsidies for private hospitals and pharmaceuticals.<br />

The first was the result of a deliberate policy to increase the use of private hospitals, while<br />

the second has been the result of growing use of drugs and increase in their prices. In<br />

spite of the use of expenditure thresholds that attract increasing rebates and or income<br />

tax concessions, some features of policies aimed at containing public outlays on health<br />

services raise both efficiency and equity issues.<br />

References<br />

● Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2000. “Household Expenditure Survey, detailed<br />

expenditure items, 1998-99”. Catalogue No. 6535.0., Canberra.<br />

● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2002. “Health expenditure Australia<br />

2000-01”, Canberra.<br />

● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2005. “Health expenditure Australia<br />

2003-04”, Canberra.<br />

● Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2006. “Australia’s Health 2006”,<br />

Canberra.<br />

● Maddison, Angus (2003). “The World Economy: Historical Statistics”, Organisation for<br />

Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.<br />

● Martins JM (2002). “Who is winning? The drug companies, the Government or the<br />

Battlers?” www.achse.org.au/publications/martins/drug.html accessed 17/03/2006.<br />

● Martins JM (2004). “Health Financing – An International Perspective”. In Courtney M,<br />

Briggs D (Editors) Health Care Financial Management, Elsevier Mosby, Sydney.<br />

● Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). “Health Data<br />

2006”. www.OECD, accessed 25 July 2006.<br />

[136]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!