Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.4 - Soft budget constraints in Spanish<br />
health care decentralization<br />
Puig-Junoy J. 1 , Prats A. T. 1<br />
Spain is divided into seventeen Regions, called Autonomous Communities (henceforth<br />
ACs or Regions) with regional governments that were created following the guidelines<br />
established in the democratic constitution ratified in 1978. There are two completely different<br />
systems of decentralization, the “foral” regime, instituted only for the Basque<br />
Country and Navarre, and the common regime, for the other fifteen Regions. The primary<br />
difference between the two systems is that Regions under the “foral” regime have authority<br />
to raise taxes locally, whereas Regions under the common regime do not have significant<br />
tax-raising authority (a recent reform, approved in July 2001 and effective as of<br />
2002, devolves some tax-raising autonomy to the Regions under the common regime).<br />
The two types of Regions have similar spending responsibilities.<br />
The common regime has been characterized by having a fair amount of expenditure<br />
responsibility, but little revenue autonomy, although revisions of the system tend to give<br />
more revenue autonomy. Until recently, mainly government transfers have financed the<br />
Regions under this regime. They can impose some taxes and duties, which represent a<br />
small percentage of revenues. They also receive ceded taxes. Ceded taxes initially included<br />
wealth tax, inheritance tax, a tax on wealth transfers, and taxes on gambling. The<br />
reforms of 1997, and especially the reform of 2001, expanded the ceded taxes to 33% of<br />
income tax, some special taxes and 40% of value added tax, but the latter without normative<br />
power. This last reform integrates the financing of health into the general system.<br />
The major change in recent years with respect to financial responsibilities across different<br />
levels of government has come from the devolution of health services management to the<br />
regional governments. This devolution process started in 1981 and was completed in<br />
2002. Until 2002, the National Institute of Health (INSALUD) managed social security<br />
health services for the 10 autonomous communities with low responsibilities within the<br />
common regime.<br />
In the last two decades, the Spanish health care system has undergone a radical change<br />
in its sources of funding, from a typical social security model of financing, based on<br />
salary contributions, to an NHS model, based on general taxation. The 1989 Public<br />
Budget Law established that general taxation revenues should progressively provide<br />
funds for health services. The share of health service funds provided by general taxation<br />
increased from 69% in 1993 to 83% in 1996 and 100% in 1999.<br />
The funds are distributed to the decentralized ACs according to a capitative criterion.<br />
Initially, the amount of funding specifically transferred was supposed to cover the actual<br />
1 Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Department of Economics and Business, Research Centre for Economics and Health<br />
(CRES).<br />
[137]<br />
CEIS Health Report 2006