15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4 - Soft budget constraints in Spanish<br />

health care decentralization<br />

Puig-Junoy J. 1 , Prats A. T. 1<br />

Spain is divided into seventeen Regions, called Autonomous Communities (henceforth<br />

ACs or Regions) with regional governments that were created following the guidelines<br />

established in the democratic constitution ratified in 1978. There are two completely different<br />

systems of decentralization, the “foral” regime, instituted only for the Basque<br />

Country and Navarre, and the common regime, for the other fifteen Regions. The primary<br />

difference between the two systems is that Regions under the “foral” regime have authority<br />

to raise taxes locally, whereas Regions under the common regime do not have significant<br />

tax-raising authority (a recent reform, approved in July 2001 and effective as of<br />

2002, devolves some tax-raising autonomy to the Regions under the common regime).<br />

The two types of Regions have similar spending responsibilities.<br />

The common regime has been characterized by having a fair amount of expenditure<br />

responsibility, but little revenue autonomy, although revisions of the system tend to give<br />

more revenue autonomy. Until recently, mainly government transfers have financed the<br />

Regions under this regime. They can impose some taxes and duties, which represent a<br />

small percentage of revenues. They also receive ceded taxes. Ceded taxes initially included<br />

wealth tax, inheritance tax, a tax on wealth transfers, and taxes on gambling. The<br />

reforms of 1997, and especially the reform of 2001, expanded the ceded taxes to 33% of<br />

income tax, some special taxes and 40% of value added tax, but the latter without normative<br />

power. This last reform integrates the financing of health into the general system.<br />

The major change in recent years with respect to financial responsibilities across different<br />

levels of government has come from the devolution of health services management to the<br />

regional governments. This devolution process started in 1981 and was completed in<br />

2002. Until 2002, the National Institute of Health (INSALUD) managed social security<br />

health services for the 10 autonomous communities with low responsibilities within the<br />

common regime.<br />

In the last two decades, the Spanish health care system has undergone a radical change<br />

in its sources of funding, from a typical social security model of financing, based on<br />

salary contributions, to an NHS model, based on general taxation. The 1989 Public<br />

Budget Law established that general taxation revenues should progressively provide<br />

funds for health services. The share of health service funds provided by general taxation<br />

increased from 69% in 1993 to 83% in 1996 and 100% in 1999.<br />

The funds are distributed to the decentralized ACs according to a capitative criterion.<br />

Initially, the amount of funding specifically transferred was supposed to cover the actual<br />

1 Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Department of Economics and Business, Research Centre for Economics and Health<br />

(CRES).<br />

[137]<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!