15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CEIS Health Report 2006<br />

The question regarding proper and appropriate levels of health expenditure is a difficult<br />

one to answer. During the past two decades, both Italy and other OECD countries have<br />

implemented a wide range of different and continuously changing models to hold down<br />

costs and improve the financial situation of their health systems. These have included<br />

gradual action in the hospital system, reducing the publicly financed health goods and<br />

services offered to families and increasing the charges to families for dental care (not in<br />

Italy).<br />

This paper reviews the data on health care expenditure in Italy and in thirty 6 other countries<br />

in the OECD area. The emphasis is put on the principal trends in our country, followed<br />

by an analysis of the principal differences between the various countries analysed.<br />

Initially, there is an analysis of health expenditure in relation to GDP, looking at the way in<br />

which the rise in health expenditure and the slowdown in economic growth have contributed<br />

to raising the share of the health sector within the economy. The paper then continues<br />

with an examination of the ways in which health care expenditure is financed in<br />

the various countries considered, and finally with an attempt to investigate how resources<br />

are assigned to the different health goods and services. Conclusions are then drawn.<br />

1.1.2 Health expenditure<br />

Health systems in the 22 OECD countries for which comparison on historical series can<br />

be performed recorded an average expenditure on health amounting to 9,5% of GDP in<br />

2004. In Italy (8,4% in 2004), health expenditure as a proportion of GDP has not altered<br />

much since 1990 (the year from which comparable data are available), also comparing it<br />

with those few countries where changes have been more significant, and has generally<br />

been lower than the OECD mean, confirming a low growth rate (Table 1).<br />

1.1.3 Health expenditure per capita<br />

Concentration only on general data at the macro level may not contribute to better understanding<br />

of the real situation in the countries analysed. Per capita expenditure can therefore<br />

be used as an additional indicator to focus more detailed attention on the distinguishing<br />

trends in the countries analysed and in particular Italy.<br />

Italy, at $ 2.392 Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), is practically in line with the OECD mean<br />

value, though 2004 showed a growth on private per capita expenditure over 2002 and<br />

2003 7 . And it is precisely that trend, regarding private per capita expenditure, that should<br />

start to arouse concern.<br />

The United States also heads the table for health expenditure per capita. In 2004, in fact<br />

it amounted to $ 6.102 (PPP) compared to less than $ 1.000 (PPP) in countries such as<br />

Mexico, Slovakia, Poland and Turkey (Figure 2).<br />

The differences between countries in total per capita health expenditure are in part attri-<br />

6 It should be emphasised that in some calculations it was not possible to include all 30 countries, as there were some for which<br />

data for 2004 were not available.<br />

7 See Colombo and Mennini (CEIS Health Report 2004); Francia and Mennini (CEIS Health Report 2005).<br />

[42]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!