15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1 - Equity in the italian healthcare<br />

system: impoverishment and catastrophic<br />

payments<br />

Doglia M. 1 , Spandonaro F. 2<br />

4.1.1 Introduction<br />

The Italian national health system (INHS) takes the form of a universal social insurance:<br />

this imply that, not only, should be able to promote citizen’s well being, but also to avoid<br />

any relevant economic burden on the households with ill members.<br />

The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed to integrate the classical (ex ante) equity<br />

approach with measures in the so-called burden space. This is an “ex-post” evaluation<br />

made comparing households out of pocket health expenditures with their capacity to<br />

pay.<br />

The burden space measures in fact can help to understand how well the INHS protects<br />

citizens from the economic risk of illness.<br />

The present contribution analyses, particularly, impoverishment and catastrophic payments<br />

phenomenon, as they results very useful in assessing household fragility.<br />

4.1.2 Databank and methodology<br />

Referring to bibliography for technicalities, we only observe that the WHO approach has<br />

been taught for a worldwide use; in the present contribution, we have tried to adapt it to<br />

the specific situations of a developed country such as Italy. Therefore we have considered<br />

the absolute poverty threshold published by the Italian Institute for Statistics (ISTAT)<br />

to evaluate the paying capacity of households, as well as the ISTAT relative poverty threshold<br />

for assessing impoverishment.<br />

According to the WHO approach, the household capacity to pay has been evaluated from<br />

the effective standardized non-subsistence consumption level.<br />

Moreover, we have chosen to focus our attention only on impoverishment and catastrophic<br />

payment as we feel that these are the most delicate issues. They can indicate both<br />

a failure in the social security mechanism, or an implicit incentive for opting out of the<br />

system, due to the relevant economic burden born by some households.<br />

One of the major shortcomings of this approach is its sensitivity to the choice of thresholds<br />

(especially for catastrophic payments): so we have elaborated both, the point level<br />

1 ISTAT National Statistical Institute, Italy.<br />

2 CEIS Sanità, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” .<br />

[231]<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!