- Page 1 and 2: CEIS Health Report 2006 Management
- Page 3: CEIS Health Report 2006 Management
- Page 7 and 8: CEIS Health Report 2006 1.2 - The E
- Page 9 and 10: CEIS Health Report 2006 2.3 - Healt
- Page 11 and 12: CEIS Health Report 2006 3.3.6.2 Hea
- Page 13 and 14: CEIS Health Report 2006 Chapter 5 -
- Page 16 and 17: Presentation We are pleased to pres
- Page 18 and 19: Management of the Italian National
- Page 20 and 21: and tariffs (of laboratories) for a
- Page 22 and 23: of resource allocation) to underest
- Page 24 and 25: ceutical policies. To encourage eff
- Page 26 and 27: This measure seems advisable both i
- Page 28 and 29: 5 Managing equity aspects A univers
- Page 30 and 31: lisation of health care differs acc
- Page 32 and 33: the patient/citizen and therefore a
- Page 34 and 35: educe the gap (although not elimina
- Page 36: in the light both of the effects of
- Page 40 and 41: 1.1 - The evolution of health expen
- Page 42 and 43: Figure 1 - Health expenditure as a
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2 - Division of health expen
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 5 - Health expenditure by so
- Page 48 and 49: Figure 7 - Changes in the public sh
- Page 50 and 51: There are different reasons that ex
- Page 52 and 53: 1.1.6 Conclusions One again finds,
- Page 54 and 55:
2004. Bisogni, risorse e nuove stra
- Page 56 and 57:
1.2 - The evolution of health expen
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 3 - Health expenditure as a
- Page 60 and 61:
Thus not only GDP per capita and th
- Page 62 and 63:
Two hypotheses have been adopted fo
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 5 - Measurements of regional
- Page 66 and 67:
1.3 - The 2007 public budget for he
- Page 68 and 69:
It must ultimately be taken into co
- Page 70 and 71:
Contributions relative to various E
- Page 72 and 73:
There is also a growth of the gener
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 1 - Net Public Pharmaceutical
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure 4 - Ticket application in th
- Page 78 and 79:
Table 2 - Coefficients of regressio
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 5 - Forecast total pharmaceut
- Page 82 and 83:
[83] CEIS Health Report 2006
- Page 84 and 85:
1.5.3 Structure of hospital “cost
- Page 86 and 87:
Hospital “costs” for ordinary h
- Page 88 and 89:
Support is thus given to the hypoth
- Page 90 and 91:
The deduction one can make from the
- Page 92 and 93:
Figure 11 - Average tariffs - Ordin
- Page 94 and 95:
Figure 14 - Average “cost” per
- Page 96 and 97:
In this context, over the last deca
- Page 98 and 99:
ticipation in specific projects, wh
- Page 100 and 101:
eal demand control aimed no longer
- Page 102 and 103:
Formazione e Ricerca, Regione del V
- Page 104 and 105:
independence acquired on the revenu
- Page 106 and 107:
There has always been a deficit sin
- Page 108 and 109:
In conclusion, although it cannot b
- Page 110 and 111:
and Piemonte; the decrease for Lazi
- Page 112 and 113:
● Rafaniello A, Spandonaro F. (20
- Page 114:
Chapter 2 Public deficit in the hea
- Page 118 and 119:
2.1 - Deficit containment or costco
- Page 120 and 121:
cated to health care are indexed on
- Page 122 and 123:
and/or increase the contributions.
- Page 124 and 125:
sure to have extra-resources. The p
- Page 126 and 127:
2.2 - Health policy issues in the U
- Page 128 and 129:
illion by 2010. Medicaid finances h
- Page 130 and 131:
2.3 - Health care: growth and the f
- Page 132 and 133:
2.3.3 Command-Control and Market-Or
- Page 134 and 135:
The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
- Page 136 and 137:
2.4 - Soft budget constraints in Sp
- Page 138 and 139:
demographic shocks and solidarity.
- Page 140 and 141:
References ● Catalán M, Guajardo
- Page 142 and 143:
directly and indirectly: allowing c
- Page 144 and 145:
2.6 - Deficit in the Argentina nati
- Page 146 and 147:
vinces the rate just reaches 30%. T
- Page 148 and 149:
Diagram 1 - Evolution of Social Wel
- Page 150 and 151:
coverage has not been defined by th
- Page 152 and 153:
References ● ADECRA (2005). “Lo
- Page 154:
Chapter 3 Efficiency
- Page 157 and 158:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 1 - R
- Page 159 and 160:
CEIS Health Report 2006 in Toscana
- Page 161 and 162:
CEIS Health Report 2006 un’interp
- Page 163 and 164:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.2 - The e
- Page 165 and 166:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The databas
- Page 167 and 168:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.2.4 The d
- Page 169 and 170:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 3 - R
- Page 171 and 172:
CEIS Health Report 2006 is that the
- Page 173 and 174:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tion of a s
- Page 175 and 176:
CEIS Health Report 2006 its attenti
- Page 177 and 178:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tract syste
- Page 179 and 180:
CEIS Health Report 2006 The satisfa
- Page 181 and 182:
CEIS Health Report 2006 structures;
- Page 183 and 184:
CEIS Health Report 2006 A further i
- Page 185 and 186:
CEIS Health Report 2006 • the sea
- Page 187 and 188:
CEIS Health Report 2006 recent year
- Page 189 and 190:
CEIS Health Report 2006 However, we
- Page 191 and 192:
CEIS Health Report 2006 vementioned
- Page 193 and 194:
CEIS Health Report 2006 With regard
- Page 195 and 196:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.5 - The B
- Page 197 and 198:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Locarno, th
- Page 199 and 200:
CEIS Health Report 2006 have a sign
- Page 201 and 202:
CEIS Health Report 2006 In a nutshe
- Page 203 and 204:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.6 - Relat
- Page 205 and 206:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tition and/
- Page 207 and 208:
CEIS Health Report 2006 behaviors i
- Page 209 and 210:
CEIS Health Report 2006 They answer
- Page 211 and 212:
CEIS Health Report 2006 [212]
- Page 213 and 214:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.7.2 Healt
- Page 215 and 216:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ted into re
- Page 217 and 218:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 2 - f
- Page 219 and 220:
CEIS Health Report 2006 • shift t
- Page 221 and 222:
CEIS Health Report 2006 3.8 - Priva
- Page 223 and 224:
CEIS Health Report 2006 We have exa
- Page 225 and 226:
CEIS Health Report 2006 households
- Page 228:
Chapter 4 Equity
- Page 231 and 232:
CEIS Health Report 2006 of catastro
- Page 233 and 234:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 4 - D
- Page 235 and 236:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tures. Besi
- Page 237 and 238:
CEIS Health Report 2006 4.1.7 Distr
- Page 239 and 240:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Along with
- Page 242 and 243:
4.2 - Access equity Rocchetti I. 1
- Page 244 and 245:
with 4.2.3 Advantages and disadvant
- Page 246 and 247:
variability that cannot be explaine
- Page 248 and 249:
Also in this case the estimates are
- Page 250:
Chapter 5 Outcomes (quality, effect
- Page 253 and 254:
CEIS Health Report 2006 at death tr
- Page 255 and 256:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 4 -
- Page 257 and 258:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Southern Re
- Page 259 and 260:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Rutstein’
- Page 261 and 262:
CEIS Health Report 2006 5.2.3 Resul
- Page 263 and 264:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Diagram 2 -
- Page 265 and 266:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Diagram 6 -
- Page 267 and 268:
CEIS Health Report 2006 worrisome r
- Page 269 and 270:
CEIS Health Report 2006 5.3 - The p
- Page 271 and 272:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 2 -
- Page 273 and 274:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Table 2 - U
- Page 275 and 276:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Box 1: Iden
- Page 277 and 278:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Figure 6 -
- Page 279 and 280:
CEIS Health Report 2006 nence; infu
- Page 281 and 282:
CEIS Health Report 2006 tribution g
- Page 283 and 284:
CEIS Health Report 2006 [284]
- Page 285 and 286:
CEIS Health Report 2006 • retired
- Page 287 and 288:
CEIS Health Report 2006 European in
- Page 289 and 290:
CEIS Health Report 2006 better trea
- Page 291 and 292:
CEIS Health Report 2006 offered by
- Page 293 and 294:
CEIS Health Report 2006 strict meas
- Page 295 and 296:
CEIS Health Report 2006 Authors Cur
- Page 297 and 298:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ✔ GABELLI
- Page 299 and 300:
CEIS Health Report 2006 ✔ RATTI M