15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3 – Health expenditure as a percentage of GDP, 2003<br />

12,00<br />

11,00<br />

10,00<br />

9,00<br />

8,00<br />

7,00<br />

6,00<br />

5,00<br />

4,00<br />

7,40<br />

Piemonte<br />

6,96<br />

Valle d’Aosta<br />

6,47<br />

Lombardia<br />

Source: Our processing of ISTAT data<br />

7,14 7,19<br />

Trentino A.A.<br />

Veneto<br />

7,62<br />

Friuli V.G.<br />

7,82<br />

Liguria<br />

7,09<br />

Emilia Romagna<br />

1.2.2 The model used<br />

In the attempt to explain the trend of total health expenditure and forecast it for the future,<br />

economic, demographic and institutional variables have been integrated.<br />

GDP constitutes a proxy for the economic level reached. Theory, and also previous empirical<br />

evidence, suggest that, at aggregate level, there is a positive correlation between<br />

economic condition and the quota assigned to health expenditure.<br />

As demographic variables, the percentage of the population aged over 65 and the generic<br />

mortality rate were used, the aim being to take account both of the phenomenon of<br />

aging of the Italian population and to verify the applicability to Italy of the theory of the<br />

so-called costs of death.<br />

At the institutional level, the decision on the proportion of the need to cover by public<br />

sector action seems to summarize the changes under way in the Italian system. As<br />

already noted, in the last decade the Italian (1990-2003) private health expenditure, as a<br />

percentage of GDP, has risen faster than that of public health expenditure 3 .<br />

Furthermore, there are marked differences among the Regions in mechanisms as to provision<br />

of the public services, in particular in the extent to which services are operated<br />

directly or contracted out, it seemed interesting to investigate the effect of these differences<br />

on total expenditure. Finally, considering the considerable evidence that exists on<br />

3 Quaderno Cerm 2/06 Spesa Sanitaria, Demografia, Governance Istituzionale; F. Pammolli e N. C. Salerno.<br />

7,43<br />

Toscana<br />

8,37<br />

Umbria<br />

7,87<br />

Marche<br />

7,97 7,97<br />

Lazio<br />

Abruzzo<br />

[59]<br />

9,34<br />

11,31<br />

10,96<br />

Molise<br />

Campania<br />

10,38<br />

Puglia<br />

9,86<br />

Basilicata<br />

11,22<br />

Calabria<br />

10,28 9,86<br />

Sicilia<br />

Sardegna<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!