15.12.2012 Views

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Chapter 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lop, rather than a variable to be changed and constantly adapted to the strategies pursued<br />

and concretely implemented.<br />

One way in which these restrictions may be avoided, in our opinion, lies in the building of<br />

enterprise bylaws limited to defining the institutional and strategic “framework” within<br />

which each enterprise may go about its business, while delegating to other tools (such<br />

as the organization Plan, application rules, internal organization documents) the task of<br />

Figura 2 - Organization Plan Functions<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

RESOURCES<br />

AND CONDITIONS<br />

increase<br />

ENTERPRISE MISSION<br />

STRATEGIC PLAN<br />

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES<br />

taking account of<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

PLAN<br />

defining and managing the processes of organizational change. Therefore, it would be<br />

expedient if the Regional governments issued not too restrictive directives and guidelines,<br />

with respect to the contents of the Bylaws; by limiting the organizational autonomy<br />

of the health enterprises the opposite effect is obtained of deresponsibilising them with<br />

regard to the exercise of a discretionary power of self-organization.<br />

The organization Plan, unlike the enterprise Bylaws, should represent the process of<br />

change consistently with the strategy (which could be defined in a Strategic Plan), long<br />

term, with all the possibilities of changing in progress based on the emergence of new<br />

needs or the assessment of the results achieved (see fig. 2).<br />

2. A second limit to the prospects of organizational development of health enterprises is<br />

the absolute predominance of interventions on the organizational structure. All too often<br />

organizational change is identified with the formalisation of new structures (at both macro<br />

and micro-organizational level): the establishment of departments, the modification of<br />

simple or complex structures, the setting up of new coordination or specialist structures.<br />

In short, organizational change seems to be reduced to structural solutions, through<br />

which to take account of all the possible criteria of aggregation of the simple units. For<br />

example, within the local services provided by a health enterprise a series of elements<br />

may coexist, such as the geographical element (the district), the specialist-functional element<br />

(the departments and offices) and the professional element (medical, psychologists<br />

and sanitary professions). It is often the case that, in order to meet all three of the abo-<br />

[191]<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

CONSTRAINTS AND<br />

CRITICALITIES<br />

reduce<br />

CEIS Health Report 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!