17.12.2012 Views

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE MUSIC CONFERENCE <strong>2007</strong> – WIEN, 7.-11. AUGUST ABSTRACTS<br />

� �<br />

HICKS, Andrew (University of Toronto, Centre for Medieval Studies)<br />

New Texts and Contexts for Twelfth-Century Music Theory<br />

Mittwoch/Wednesday, 8.8., 14.30 Uhr, KuGe, SR 3<br />

“Where are the writers on music west of the Rhine?” This is the question Lawrence<br />

Gushee posed upwards of thirty years ago as he surveyed eleventh- and twelfth-century<br />

music-theoretical writings. As far as the “technical” tradition is concerned, the story is a<br />

familiar one, indeed. Following an eleventh-century flurry of activity in South-German<br />

monasteries, music-theoretical discourse seems to exhibit a decisive change in register.<br />

The broad mathematical and cosmological concerns that had bound music to the<br />

quadrivium seem to be supplanted by a much narrower and more practical focus on the<br />

rapidly developing polyphonic practices. Comprehensive and substantive musical treatises<br />

either were not written or have not survived. But this apparent dearth of twelfthcentury<br />

“writers on music” does not, in fact, reflect the evidence of surviving texts; rather, it is a<br />

product of modern disciplinary divisions and musicological expectations. Musical discourse<br />

belongs as much, if not more, to the rich cosmological and philosophical traditions<br />

of the twelfth century. The language of music theory not only allowed twelfthcentury<br />

cosmologists (like Bernard of Chartres, William of Conches and Bernard Silvestris) to<br />

conceptualize the fabric of the universe; it also provided a hermeneutic tool for interpreting<br />

the Antique and late-Antique texts that offered detailed theories of the world’s construction.<br />

Philosophical and cosmological commentaries comprise a distinct and influential<br />

music-theoretical tradition – one that speaks not only to the scope of twelfth-century<br />

musical learning, but also to the application of that learning in the quest for philosophy<br />

and, ultimately, theology. This study will outline this theoretical tradition and re-assess<br />

the aim and scope of twelfth-century music theory by introducing unedited texts into the<br />

discussion – including a Florentine commentary on Martianus’s De nuptiis (Florence, Bibl.<br />

Naz., Conv. soppr. J.1.29, ff. 50 r –64 v ) and a partial commentary on Plato’s Timaeus (Paris,<br />

BN, lat. 8624, ff. 17 r –22 v ).<br />

� �<br />

HIGGINS, Paula (University of Nottingham)<br />

Of Mice and Manhood: Discourses of Aesthetic Excess in the Reception of Josquin’s<br />

Planxit autem David<br />

Samstag/Saturday, 11.8., 11.15 Uhr, MuWi, HS 1<br />

Heinrich Glarean introduced his discussion of the opening of Josquin’s motet Planxit autem<br />

David with the famous line from Horace’s Ars poetica ‘The mountains are in labor, but<br />

a ridiculous mouse will be born’. This citation, together with Glarean’s ensuing disclaimer<br />

that ‘nothing in this piece is unworthy of the composer’, has long been adduced as evidence<br />

of the Swiss humanist’s doubts as to Josquin’s authorship. While Glarean’s somewhat<br />

defensive framing of the discussion seems to anticipate criticism, its presumed correlation<br />

with the motet’s inauthenticity remains open to interpretation.<br />

- 43 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!