17.12.2012 Views

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

(Stand: 25. Juli 2007) ANDERSON, Michael Alan ... - Universität Wien

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE MUSIC CONFERENCE <strong>2007</strong> – WIEN, 7.-11. AUGUST ABSTRACTS<br />

Doppelkanons in Anticos Druck Motetti novi e chanzoni franciose a quatro sopra doi (RISM<br />

1520 3 ), den „freien“ Pol durch den allgemeinen Hinweis auf die Fülle von „mille belle, e<br />

leggiadri inventioni“ in den Werken Adrian Willaerts. Ausgehend von Anticos Druck<br />

soll das Bedeutungsspektrum von Zarlinos Begriff dargestellt und mit Beispielen<br />

illustriert werden.<br />

� �<br />

JENKINS, Chadwick (Columbia University)<br />

“Est modus in rebus”: Horace, Aristotle, and the Late-Renaissance Theory of the<br />

Modes<br />

Samstag/Saturday, 11.8., 11.45 Uhr, KuGe, SR 3<br />

Late-Renaissance music-theoretical treatises are rife with citations from authority ranging<br />

from philosophy to history to poetry. Therefore, it is not surprising that Horace should be<br />

prominently featured in the writings of two of the most important music theorists of the<br />

era, Gioseffo Zarlino and Giovanni Maria Artusi. However, two specific citations from<br />

Horace (one from the first Satire and the other from the Ars Poetica), when combined<br />

with Aristotelian hylomorphic theory, play a particularly prominent role in Zarlino and<br />

Artusi’s understanding of a notoriously fractious music-theoretical concept: the modes.<br />

The musical modes, for these writers, involve limits beyond which a composer must<br />

not go. This Horatian insight regarding the proper limits of any given entity is conjoined<br />

with Aristotelian hylomorphism in that the modes are also regarded as substantial forms.<br />

According to Aristotle, the substantial form defines what a thing is, its quiddity. Although<br />

a range of accidental forms or particular individual entities may exist, they must<br />

all be subsumed beneath a given substantial form. Thus this concept also serves as a definitional<br />

limit. An understanding of the combination of these Horatian and Aristotelian<br />

concerns clarifies what these theorists mean by defining mode “as form“.<br />

The warning that opens Horace’s Ars Poetica (that combining things improperly<br />

gives rise to the monstrous) thus informs Artusi’s critical concern for modal unity. To<br />

compose a work that mixes substantial forms is to give birth to a deviant, formless entity<br />

that cannot function properly as music. This is one of Artusi’s primary reasons for rejecting<br />

Monteverdi’s music.<br />

This investigation of the use of Horace’s poetry tempered by Aristotelian metaphysics<br />

clarifies an important function that ancient Latin poetry played within Late-<br />

Renaissance understandings of music. It demonstrates that such poetic citations served as<br />

an integral part of the theoretical enterprise.<br />

� �<br />

- 45 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!