Crop Insurance as a Risk Management Strategy in Bangladesh
Crop Insurance as a Risk Management Strategy in Bangladesh
Crop Insurance as a Risk Management Strategy in Bangladesh
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
program w<strong>as</strong> on H-4 cotton <strong>in</strong> Gujarat. All such programs, however, resulted <strong>in</strong> considerable<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial losses. The program(s) covered 3110 farmers for a premium of Rs. 4, 54,000 and<br />
paid claims of Rs. 3.79 millions. It w<strong>as</strong> realized that programs b<strong>as</strong>ed on the <strong>in</strong>dividual farm<br />
approach would not be viable <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />
Individual farm b<strong>as</strong>ed approach<br />
Obviously, “<strong>in</strong>dividual farm approach” would reflect crop losses on realistic b<strong>as</strong>is and hence,<br />
most desirable, but, <strong>in</strong> Indian conditions, implement<strong>in</strong>g a crop <strong>in</strong>surance scheme at<br />
“<strong>in</strong>dividual farm unit level” is beset with problems, such <strong>as</strong>:<br />
(i) Non availability of p<strong>as</strong>t record of land surveys, ownership, tenancy and yields at<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual farm level<br />
(ii) Large number of farm hold<strong>in</strong>gs (nearly 116 millions) with small farm hold<strong>in</strong>g size<br />
(country average of 1.41 hectares)<br />
(iii) Remoteness of villages and <strong>in</strong>accessibility of farm-hold<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
(iv) Large variety of crops, varied agro-climatic conditions and package of practices<br />
(v) Simultaneous harvest<strong>in</strong>g of crops all over the country<br />
(vi) Effort required <strong>in</strong> collection of small amount of premium from large no. of farmers<br />
(vii) Prohibitive cost of manpower and <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>as</strong>tructure<br />
Later a ‘homogeneous area’ approach for crop <strong>in</strong>surance w<strong>as</strong> suggested, after a review <strong>in</strong> the<br />
mid-seventies. The General <strong>Insurance</strong> Corporation of India (GIC) prepared a Pilot <strong>Crop</strong><br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Scheme (PCIS) b<strong>as</strong>ed on the area approach that w<strong>as</strong> operated from 1979. In all 13<br />
States implemented it by 1984-85. Participation w<strong>as</strong> voluntary. The scheme covered cereals,<br />
millets, oilseeds, cotton, potato, gram and barley. The GIC and the State government <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ratio of 2:1 shared the risk. The <strong>in</strong>surance premium ranged from 5 per cent to 10 per cent of<br />
the sum <strong>in</strong>sured. The scheme covered 6,27,000 farmers for premium of Rs. 19.7 millions<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st claims of 15.7 millions.<br />
Comprehensive <strong>Crop</strong> <strong>Insurance</strong> Scheme (CCIS)<br />
The Government of India <strong>in</strong>troduced the CCIS dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 1985-86. GIC operated it with<br />
the <strong>as</strong>sistance and <strong>in</strong>volvement of the respective State governments. The CCIS envisaged the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g objectives:<br />
(i) To provide a me<strong>as</strong>ure of f<strong>in</strong>ancial support to farmers <strong>in</strong> the event of crop failure <strong>as</strong> a<br />
result of drought, flood etc;<br />
(ii) To restore the credit eligibility of farmers, after a crop failure, for the next crop<br />
se<strong>as</strong>on; and<br />
(iii) To support and stimulate production of cereals, pulses and oilseeds<br />
The scheme covered cereals, millets, pulses and oilseeds. The particular crops to be covered<br />
by <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong> different are<strong>as</strong> were notified by the State governments subject to availability<br />
of historical yield data. The coverage w<strong>as</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>in</strong>stitutional credit and farmers who took<br />
crop loans for the specified crops were eligible for coverage of <strong>in</strong>surance. The scheme w<strong>as</strong><br />
optional to States. Once the State opted, the participation of farmers who took short-term<br />
crop loan from cooperative credit <strong>in</strong>stitutions, commercial banks and regional rural banks<br />
w<strong>as</strong> compulsory. GIC on behalf of the Government of India and the State government <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ratio of 2:1 shared the claims and premium. In the orig<strong>in</strong>al scheme the sum <strong>in</strong>sured for the<br />
41