27.07.2021 Views

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Saturated <strong>Sand</strong> <strong>Cutting</strong>.<br />

which the theoretical distribution is represented by the solid line. <strong>The</strong> water sub-pressures are made dimensionless,<br />

although the weighted average permeability km is used instead of the permeability kmax used in the equations. From<br />

this research the following conclusions can be drawn:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> measured forces and water sub-pressures show, in general, a good correlation with the theory.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> tendency towards increasing and more upward aimed forces with increasing blade angles can be observed<br />

clearly in the Table 6-8 and Table 6-9.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> ratio between the measured and calculated forces becomes smaller when the blade angle and the bladeheight<br />

/ layer-thickness ratio increase.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> cutting forces on the blade with the wear face are almost equal to the cutting forces on the blade with the<br />

radius of rounding, but are slightly aimed more upward.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> ratio between the measured and calculated water sub-pressures is, in general, smaller than the ratio<br />

between the measured and calculated cutting forces.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> measured water sub-pressures on the blade with the wear face and the blade with the radius of rounding<br />

differ slightly (Table 6-10) from the water sub-pressures on the blade with the radius of rounding. On the 30<br />

and the 45 blade, the water sub-pressures tends to smaller values for the blade with the wear face, although<br />

the differences are very small. On the 60 blade these water sub-pressures are slightly higher. <strong>The</strong>refore it can<br />

be concluded that, for water pressures calculations, the wear-section-length / layer-thickness ratio w/h i has to<br />

be chosen dependent of the blade angle. Which was already clear during the tests because the clearance angle<br />

increased with a larger blade angle. For the determination of Appendix H to Appendix J, however, the ratio<br />

used was w/h i=0.2, which is a good average value.<br />

Table 6-8: Measured dimensionless forces.<br />

measured<br />

calculated<br />

not-corrected corrected theoretical<br />

hb/hi ct t ct t ct t<br />

30° 1 0.54 +29.3° 0.49 +29.0° 0.39 +28.3°<br />

30° 2 0.48 +27.5° 0.46 +27.2° 0.43 +27.4°<br />

30° 3 0.49 +27.6° 0.46 +27.3° 0.43 +27.3°<br />

45° 1 0.78 +15.1° 0.58 +13.9° 0.49 +12.9°<br />

45° 2 0.64 +12.3° 0.59 +11.6° 0.57 +10.7°<br />

45° 3 0.60 +11.0° 0.55 +10.5° 0.61 + 9.9°<br />

60° 1 1.16 + 0.7° 0.77 - 0.6° 0.69 + 0.7°<br />

60° 2 0.95 - 1.4° 0.79 - 2.2° 0.83 - 3.2°<br />

60° 3 0.93 - 3.4° 0.82 - 4.0° 0.91 - 4.6°<br />

60° 6 0.70 - 4.8° 0.64 - 5.7° 1.14 - 7.4°<br />

Measured dimensionless forces, not-corrected and corrected for gravity and inertia forces and theoretical values<br />

according to Appendix H to Appendix J for the blade with the radius of rounding and the sub-pressure behind the<br />

blade. <strong>The</strong> theoretical values for ct and t are determined based on values for the angle of internal friction of 38,<br />

a soil/steel angle of friction of 30 and a weighted average permeability of 0.000242 m/s, dependent on the weigh<br />

factor a1.<br />

Table 6-9: Measured dimensionless forces.<br />

measured<br />

calculated<br />

not-corrected corrected theoretical<br />

hb/hi ct t ct t ct t<br />

30° 1 0.53 +26.2° 0.48 +25.9° 0.39 +28.3°<br />

30° 2 0.48 +24.0° 0.46 +23.7° 0.43 +27.4°<br />

30° 3 0.49 +24.7° 0.46 +24.3° 0.43 +27.3°<br />

45° 1 0.72 +11.9° 0.57 +11.0° 0.49 +12.9°<br />

45° 2 0.66 + 8.8° 0.60 + 8.3° 0.57 +10.7°<br />

45° 3 0.63 + 7.8° 0.60 + 7.3° 0.61 + 9.9°<br />

60° 1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----<br />

60° 2 0.90 - 5.6° 0.80 - 6.2° 0.83 - 3.2°<br />

60° 3 0.95 - 7.3° 0.87 - 8.0° 0.91 - 4.6°<br />

60° 6 0.70 - 9.2° 0.64 -10.1° 1.14 - 7.4°<br />

Copyright © Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema TOC Page 175 of 454

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!