27.07.2021 Views

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Delft</strong> <strong>Sand</strong>, <strong>Clay</strong> & <strong>Rock</strong> <strong>Cutting</strong> <strong>Model</strong>.<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

UCS <br />

<br />

<br />

m <br />

m s 1<br />

2 UCS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

min<br />

m 4 m s <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

UCS <br />

<br />

<br />

min<br />

<br />

(8-26)<br />

Figure 8-11 and Figure 8-12 show the Hoek & Brown failure criterion for the top of the Mohr circles (A) and for<br />

the real failure condition (B). Although still based on UTS or BTS and UCS and not on two tests with shear failure,<br />

the resulting failure curve seems more realistic, which seems logic since it is based on many experiments. <strong>The</strong><br />

Mohr circles for UTS, BTS and UCS are determined for UCS=100 MPa, UTS=BTS=15 MPa. <strong>The</strong> transition<br />

brittle-ductile according to Mogi (1966) is at a normal stress of 150 MPa.<br />

Taking an average internal friction angle from a normal stress of zero to a normal stress of 240 MPa gives φ=27.1º.<br />

Page 254 of 454 TOC Copyright © Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!