24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results: We evaluated 76 pts with MTNBC after 4 cycles of PCMF chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

CR was found in 3 pts (3.9%), PR in 16 pts (21.0%), SD in 11 pts (14.5%), and PD<br />

in 39 pts (51.3%); with ORR in 19 pts (24.9%) and TCR in 30 pts (39.5%).<br />

Hematological toxicity: grade 3 and 4 anemia was found in 4 pts (5.3%) and<br />

leukopenia in 9 pts (11.8%). Non-hematological toxicity: renal grade 3 awas observed<br />

in 2 pts (2.6%). Not a single <strong>the</strong>rapy was interrupted due to toxicity, but <strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

prolongation was present in 15% of applied cycles.<br />

Conclusions: The application of PCMF chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy q4w in <strong>the</strong> treatment of<br />

patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes as adjuvant treatment<br />

appeared to be effective with ORR in 24.9% and TCR in 39.5% and can be<br />

administered with good tolerance.It is today our standard treatment in this pts<br />

population.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

391 TRASTUZUMAB-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY (CT) FOR<br />

HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC): WHICH<br />

OPTIMAL PARTNER BEYOND THE FIRST LINE? A<br />

SINGLE-CENTRE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY<br />

R. Palumbo 1 , A. Bernardo 1 , A. Riccardi 2 , F. Sottotetti 1 , M. Azzarà 2 ,<br />

B. Tagliaferri 1 , E. Pozzi 1 , C.M. Teragni 1 , G. Bernardo 1<br />

1 Oncologia Medica 2, Fondazione S. Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, ITALY, 2 Medical<br />

Oncology, University of Pavia, Pavia, ITALY<br />

Background: The activity of trastuzumab-based chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (CT) in HER2+ MBC<br />

is well established, but <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> optimal CT partner remains a relevant<br />

issue. We performed a retrospective comparison of <strong>the</strong> clinical outcomes associated<br />

with different trastuzumab-CT regimens.<br />

Patients and methods: Patients (pts) for this analysis were selected from a<br />

monoinstitutional database of HER2+ MBC pts receiving trastuzumab-based CT for<br />

<strong>the</strong> metastatic disease (February 2005-December 2008). Treatment activity and safety<br />

were assessed by <strong>the</strong> WHO criteria, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival<br />

(OS) were calculated by <strong>the</strong> Kaplan Meier method.<br />

Results: A total of 147 pts with measurable disease were evaluated: 57 received<br />

trastuzumab with weekly vinorelbine (T/VNR), 48 weekly or 3–weekly trastuzumab<br />

plus docetaxel (T/Doc), 42 a triple combination of 3-weekly trastuzumab plus oral<br />

vinorelbine and capecitabine (T/osVNR/Cape) as 1 st line <strong>the</strong>rapy. Objective RR was<br />

76% in <strong>the</strong> T/VNR group, 68% in <strong>the</strong> T/Doc regimen, and 72% in <strong>the</strong> T/osVNR/<br />

Cape combination. There was no significant difference in median TTP according to<br />

treatment type (14, 11 and 12 months, respectively, p = 0.62); median OS was 36<br />

months, 32 and 34 months, respectively (p = 0.48). More treatment-related grade 3-4<br />

toxicities were recorded in <strong>the</strong> T/Doc population. Following progression, pts received<br />

trastuzumab-based subsequent lines of treatment; according to our Institution police,<br />

shifting to a different CT partner: all had a 2 nd line, 86 a 3 rd line, 41 a 4 th line, 7 a<br />

5 th line. In univariate analysis no visceral involvement, T/Doc 1 st line CT, low<br />

primary tumor grading were correlated with better PFS and OS; in multivariate<br />

analysis <strong>the</strong> number of trastuzumab-based regimens was <strong>the</strong> only factor with<br />

statistically significant impact on OS (p = 0.02).<br />

Conclusions: These results confirm <strong>the</strong> high activity of <strong>the</strong> tested regimens as 1 st<br />

line <strong>the</strong>rapy of HER2+ MBC, without significant differences in clinical outcomes,<br />

also suggesting <strong>the</strong> benefit of multiple lines of trastuzumab-based CT in a<br />

significant subset of pts, since each subsequent line may contribute to a longer<br />

OS.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

392 PHASE II STUDY OF SINGLE AGENT ORAL VINORELBINE (OV)<br />

AS FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY (CT) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH<br />

HER-2 NEGATIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC): A<br />

SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE<br />

M. Mansour 1 , C. Mourad 2<br />

1 Oncology, Erfan Hospital, Jeddah, SAUDI ARABIA, 2 Medical Affairs, Pierre<br />

Fabre Medicament, Beirut, LEBANON<br />

Background: Quality of life and pts’ preferences play an important role in treatment<br />

decision-making in <strong>the</strong> metastatic setting. Previous studies indicated that Oral CT is<br />

convenient and a preferred option by many pts. We hereby report <strong>the</strong> efficacy and<br />

safety of OV as first-line CT for MBC.<br />

Patients and methods: 31 pts were enrolled between January 2007 and December<br />

2010. All pts had measurable disease, a majority (84%) relapsing after anthracyclines<br />

(ANT) and/or taxanes (TXN) adjuvant treatment, WHO PS ≤ 2, adequate bone<br />

marrow, hepatic and renal functions and no adjuvant CT within <strong>the</strong> last 6 months.<br />

Pts were treated every 3 weeks with OV 60 mg/m 2 D1 and D8 for <strong>the</strong> 1 st cycle and<br />

<strong>the</strong>reafter 80 mg/m 2 D1 and D8 every 3 weeks in <strong>the</strong> absence of G4 neutropenia<br />

and/or febrile neutropenia. Treatment was administered until disease progression or<br />

unexpected adverse event or pt refusal to continue. Primary endpoint (EP) was<br />

Objective Response Rate (ORR); secondary EPs were TTP, OS and safety. Follow-up<br />

results until April <strong>2012</strong> are reported.<br />

Results: Median age was 42 years (range, 33 -75); median WHO PS 1 (range, 0-2).<br />

Previous adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy: ANT-based alone: 29%, TXN-based alone: 19%, ANT plus<br />

TXN: 36%, o<strong>the</strong>r: 16%. Median disease-free interval from end of previous CT was 7<br />

months. 26 pts (84%) had 2 or more metastatic sites, liver (61%), bone (58%), lung<br />

(58%) being <strong>the</strong> most frequent sites. A median of 6 cycles were administered (range,<br />

2-20). ORR was achieved in 9 pts (29%), including 1 complete and 8 partial responses.<br />

12 pts (39%) had stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 68%. In pts<br />

pretreated by ANT, ORR was 35% and CBR was 70%. Median TTP was 3.7 months<br />

[95% CI: 2.2-5.2]. Median survival was 16 months [95% CI: 11.4-20.6]. 3 pts (10%)<br />

developed G 3-4 neutropenia. No events of febrile neutropenia, cardiac, renal toxicities<br />

or alopecia were recorded. G 3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 2 pts (6%). 5 pts<br />

(16%) developed G 3 nausea-vomiting.<br />

Conclusions: Results show a good efficacy and tolerance profile of OV as first line CT<br />

for HER-2 negative MBC pts. Similar activity was observed in <strong>the</strong> sub-group of pts<br />

pretreated by ANT.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

393 VINORELBINE WITH OR WITHOUT TRASTUZUMAB<br />

IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

A. Stravodimou, K. Zaman, I.A. Voutsadakis<br />

Centre Pluridisciplinaire d’Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois -<br />

CHUV, Lausanne, SWITZERLAND<br />

Background: Vinorelbine is one of <strong>the</strong> most widely used drugs in metastatic breast<br />

cancer. We report a single center experience with vinorelbine with or without<br />

trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer.<br />

Patients and methods: All patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving<br />

vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab during a six years period were<br />

retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and data on response, time to<br />

progression (TTP) and survival were collected. Patients received vinorelbine IV<br />

25-30 mg/m2or PO 60-80 mg/m2 in days 1 and 8 of a 21 days cycle. In patients who<br />

received concomitant trastuzumab a standard dosing schedule with 8 mg/kg loading<br />

dose followed by 6 mg/kg in subsequent administrations every three weeks was used.<br />

Results: Eighty seven women were included. The median age was 63 years (range 32<br />

to 85). Sixty two patients received vinorelbine alone and 25 patients received<br />

vinorelbine with trastuzumab. In 67 patients this was <strong>the</strong> first line treatment for<br />

metastatic disease and in 20 patients it was 2nd or later line of treatment. Seventy<br />

patients were evaluable for response while <strong>the</strong> remaining seventeen patients were not<br />

evaluable due to early progression (n = 6) or early termination of treatment for<br />

adversary effects (n = 11). The response rate of evaluable patients was 37.1% [1.4%<br />

Complete Response (CR) and 35.7% Partial Response (PR)]. Eighteen additional<br />

patients (25.7%) had Stable Disease (SD) for three or more months resulting in a<br />

Disease Control Rate of 62.8%. Twenty four of 54 (44.4%) patients receiving first line<br />

treatment had a response while in <strong>the</strong> second and subsequent lines setting two of 16<br />

(12.5%) patients responded (x2 = 9.66, p = 0.001). A response was obtained in 63.6%<br />

of patients receiving concomitant trastuzumab and in 25% of patients receiving<br />

vinorelbine alone (x2 = 13.63, p = 0.0002). The median TTP was six months (range<br />

1-45). Sixty six patients of <strong>the</strong> cohort have died and <strong>the</strong> median overall survival was<br />

11.5 months (range 1-83). Adverse effects necessitating interruption of treatment<br />

were observed in 18.5% of patients.<br />

Conclusion: This retrospective study of vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer<br />

confirms a high disease control rate. Response rate is higher in first line treatment<br />

compared to subsequent lines and with <strong>the</strong> combination with trastuzumab.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

394 A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF CISPLATIN/VINORELBINE<br />

VERSUS CAPECITABINE/VINORELBINE AS SECOND-LINE OR<br />

THIRD-LINE TREATMENT IN ADVANCED BREAST CANCER<br />

Y. Liu 1 , S. Shi 1 ,X.Qu 1 , J. Shi 2 , L. Zhang 2 ,L.Xu 2 , Y. Teng 2<br />

1 Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang,<br />

CHINA, 2 Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical<br />

University, Shenyang, CHINA<br />

Purpose: To compare <strong>the</strong> efficacy and safety of cisplatin or capecitabine, both with<br />

vinorelbine, as second-line or third-line treatment in advanced breast cancer<br />

previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes.<br />

Methods: From June 2004 to November 2011, 62 advanced breast cancer patients<br />

were eligible. Patients (38) enrolled in group NP received VIN 25mg/m 2 on day 1<br />

and 8 combined with Cisplatin 75mg/m 2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients (24)<br />

enrolled in group NX received VIN 25mg/m 2 on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle<br />

combined with CAP 1000mg/m 2 twice daily for 14 consecutive days followed by 7<br />

days of rest. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 cycles according to RESIST<br />

criteria. Toxicity was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common<br />

Toxicity Criteria (version 3.0).<br />

Results: The overall response rate (ORR) in group NP was 47.4%, all were partial<br />

responses (PRs). In group NX, ORR was 33.3% (P = 0.275), with 4.2% CRs and<br />

ix138 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!