24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annals of Oncology<br />

1522PD A MULTI-CENTER PHASE II CLINICAL TRIAL OF THE<br />

CHIMERIC ANTI-MESOTHELIN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY<br />

AMATUXIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

FOR FRONTLINE THERAPY OF MALIGNANT PLEURAL<br />

MESOTHELIOMA: UPDATED CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND<br />

CORRELATIVE STUDIES<br />

M. Reck 1 , R. Hassan 2 , T. Jahan 3 , H.L. Kindler 4 , L. Bazhenova 5 ,P.Fatato 6 ,J.<br />

W. Heyburn 6 , J. Parno 6 , J.D. Maltzman 6 , B. Wallin 6<br />

1 Thoracic Oncology, Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, GERMANY,<br />

2 Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Be<strong>the</strong>sda, MD,<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3 Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of<br />

California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,<br />

4 University of Chicago, Division of Oncology, Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES OF<br />

AMERICA, 5 Health Sciences, UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, UNITED<br />

STATES OF AMERICA, 6 Oncology, Morphotek, Exton, PA, UNITED STATES OF<br />

AMERICA<br />

Background: Amatuximab (MORAb-009) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to<br />

meso<strong>the</strong>lin, a cell surface glycoprotein highly expressed in malignant meso<strong>the</strong>lioma<br />

(MPM). Based on amatuximab results in a phase I clinical trial and pre-clinical<br />

studies showing synergy in combination with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy, a single arm phase II<br />

study of amatuximab plus pemetrexed (P) and cisplatin (C) was initiated in MPM<br />

patients (Pts).<br />

Methods: Eligibility criteria: unresectable epi<strong>the</strong>lial or biphasic MPM, no prior<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >70%. Pts received<br />

amatuximab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 with P 500 mg/m 2 and C 75 mg/m 2 (PC)<br />

given on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 6 cycles. Pts with objective response or stable<br />

disease received amatuximab mono<strong>the</strong>rapy until disease progression. Primary<br />

endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (mo). Secondary endpoints:<br />

overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pulmonary function (PFT), and<br />

safety of amatuximab with PC.<br />

Results: 89 pts with unresectable MPM were enrolled at 26 sites. Pt characteristics:<br />

median age 67 yrs (range 46-80); 78% male; 70% with KPS >90%; 89% epi<strong>the</strong>lial<br />

MPM, 11% biphasic MPM; 88% had stage III/IV disease. Median PC-amatuximab<br />

cycles: 5 (range 1-6). 56 (63%) pts subsequently received single agent amatuximab. In<br />

addition to expected toxicities from PC, hypersensitivity reactions (12.4%; Grade 3/4<br />

= 5%) from amatuximab were noted. By independent radiological review, 30 pts<br />

(39%) had a partial response and 39 (51%) had stable disease. PFS at 6 mo: 52%<br />

(95% CI: 39.5-63.5). Median PFS = 6.1 mo (95% CI: 5.4-6.5). Median OS = 14.8 mo<br />

(95% CI: 12.4 – 19.2). 29 pts are alive and 5 pts are still receiving maintenance<br />

amatuximab. The mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) change from baseline was<br />

132ml. The proportion of pts with an FVC improvement of > 400ml was 23%.<br />

Conclusions: Amatuximab in combination with PC was generally well-tolerated in<br />

this study in MPM pts with a disease control rate of 90%. The median OS of 14.8<br />

months compares favorably with historical controls.<br />

Disclosure: M. Reck: Advisory Board (compensated): Hoffmann-La Roche, Lilly,<br />

AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS. Honoraria for lectures: Hoffmann-La<br />

Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-SankyoT. Jahan: research funding from Genentech,<br />

Lilly and PfizerH.L. Kindler: research funding for morphotekP. Fatato: Employee of<br />

MorphotekJ.W. Heyburn: Employee of MorphotekJ. Parno: Employee of MorphotekJ.<br />

D. Maltzman: Employee of MorphotekB. Wallin: Employee of MorphotekAll o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1523P THE 8.1 ANCESTRAL HAPLOTYPE IS STRONGLY<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH THE RISK OF SMALL CELL LUNG<br />

CANCER<br />

J. Kocsis 1 ,L.Graf 1 , A. Szilagyi 2 , B. Dome 3 , L. Tamasi 4 , G. Galffy 4 , Z. Orosz 5 ,<br />

Z. Prohaszka 2 , G. Fust 2 , Z. Bartfai 6<br />

1 3rd Dept of Internal Medicine, Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest,<br />

HUNGARY, 2 3rd Dept of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest,<br />

HUNGARY, 3 Tumor Biology, National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology,<br />

Budapest, HUNGARY, 4 Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest,<br />

HUNGARY, 5 Radiology and Onco<strong>the</strong>rapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest,<br />

HUNGARY, 6 Pulmonology, Erzsebet Hospital, Sopron, HUNGARY<br />

Background: It is well established that <strong>the</strong> risk of lung cancer is related to <strong>the</strong><br />

individual genetic background as it is reflected in <strong>the</strong> increased incidences among<br />

first degree relatives. The discovery of <strong>the</strong>se genetic variations can lead to <strong>the</strong><br />

identification of those individuals who are at high risk of developing lung cancer.<br />

AH8.1 is a haplotype which extends through <strong>the</strong> whole MHC region in <strong>the</strong> short<br />

arm of chromosome 6. It is <strong>the</strong> most frequent and a very conservative haplotype in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Caucasian population. Previously we have reported a strong association between<br />

AH8.1 and colorectal cancer with an odds ratio higher than any risks reported for<br />

SNPs in genome-wide association studies or candidate gene studies. Published data<br />

indicate that AH8.1 is a strong risk factor for ovarian cancer and for non-Hodgkin<br />

lymphoma as well.<br />

Aim/methods: Here we have determined <strong>the</strong> carrier state of AH8.1 in 102<br />

patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (62 + 7.8 years), 94 patients with<br />

non- SCLC (NSCLC) (59+ 8.6 years) and in 248 age-matched control subjects<br />

(66.7 + 6.5 years). Subjects carrying all <strong>the</strong> four marker alleles of AH8.1 (C allele<br />

of AGER 429T > C, G allele of HSP70-2 1267A > G, A allele of TNFalpha -308G<br />

> A, as well as G allele of LTA 252A > G polymorphisms) were considered as<br />

AH8.1 carriers.<br />

Results: 23% (23/102) of SCLC patients, 13.8% (13/94) of NSCLC patients, and 13%<br />

(32/248) of healthy controls carried <strong>the</strong> AH8.1 haplotype. We have found a<br />

significant increased risk for SCLC in those people carrying AH8.1 with an odds<br />

ratio of 1.94 (1.01-3.73; p = 0.046) (for men: 3.09, 1.07-8.82; p = 0.031). However,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was no significant increase in <strong>the</strong> risk for NSCLC.<br />

Summary: These findings indicate that carriers of <strong>the</strong> AH8.1 haplotype are at<br />

increased risk for SCLC and it can be due to <strong>the</strong> altered immune response that is<br />

characteristic for 8.1 AH.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1524P COMBINATION OF THREE CYTOTOXIC AGENTS IN SMALL<br />

CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

G. Stathopoulos 1 , D. Traphalis 1 , J. Dimitroulis 2 , C. Kosmas 3 , J. Stathopoulos 1 ,<br />

D. Tsavdaridis 4<br />

1 A’ Oncology Clinic Errikos Dunant, Dr. Georgios Stathopoulos, A<strong>the</strong>ns,<br />

GREECE, 2 6th Pneumonic Clinic, Hospital for Thoracic Disease, A<strong>the</strong>ns,<br />

GREECE, 3 Oncology Clinic, Anticancer Hospital Piraeus, Piraeus, GREECE,<br />

4 Oncology Clinic, Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, GREECE<br />

Background: Small-cell lung cancer treatment has been tested by using combinations<br />

of several cytotoxic agents. For quite a number of years, <strong>the</strong> established treatment has<br />

been cisplatin and etoposide as <strong>the</strong> most effective chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy regimen. Paclitaxel<br />

has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide; <strong>the</strong> latter three -<br />

drug treatment has been effective but unacceptable due to toxicity.<br />

Patients and methods: In <strong>the</strong> present trial we tested <strong>the</strong> aforementioned three-drug<br />

combination and avoided <strong>the</strong> toxicity in <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> patients by administering<br />

all 3 drugs on day 1 instead of on <strong>the</strong> established three days of treatment. Fifty patients<br />

were recruited from 5 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically- or cytologicallyconfirmed<br />

small-cell-lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40% and 60% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> patients respectively. Treatment was as follows: cisplatin 75mg/m 2 , etoposide<br />

120mg/m 2 with no dosage higher than 200mg/m 2 and paclitaxel 135mg/m 2 . The agents<br />

were administered on day 1 and repeated every three weeks for 6 cycles in total.<br />

Results: The median survival was 14 months (95% CI 10.6-17.4) Forty-five patients<br />

(90%) achieved a response: 20(40%) patients a complete response and 25 (50%) a<br />

partial response. Adverse reactions was grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12% and 2% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> patients, respectively. O<strong>the</strong>r side effects involved very low toxicity.<br />

Conclusion: The one-day three-agent (cisplatin, etoposide, paclitaxel) treatment of<br />

small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and has<br />

low and well-tolerated toxicity.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1525P THIRD-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN SMALL CELL LUNG<br />

CANCER: AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS<br />

D. Simos 1 , G. Sajjady 2 , M. Sergi 3 , M.S. Liew 4 , R. Califano 5 ,C.Ho 2 , N.B. Leighl 3 ,<br />

S. White 4 , Y. Summers 5 , P. Wheatley-Price 1<br />

1 Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, CANADA,<br />

2 Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, CANADA,<br />

3 Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, CANADA, 4 Austin<br />

Health, Joint Austin-Ludwig Oncology Unit, Victoria, AUSTRALIA, 5 Medical<br />

Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust & University Hospital South<br />

Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease and<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (CT) is <strong>the</strong> mainstay of treatment. Despite good response rates most<br />

patients (pts) will relapse and die of this disease. Standard 1st-line CT in limited<br />

(LD) and extensive stage disease is usually etoposide with platinum (P) or CAV<br />

(cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine). At progression, 2nd-line CT may<br />

involve re-challenging with <strong>the</strong> 1st-line regimen. For pts who progress after 2 lines of<br />

CT, <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence to guide treatment decisions, and <strong>the</strong> benefit of 3rd-line<br />

CT is unclear.<br />

Objective: To determine <strong>the</strong> clinical benefit of 3rd-line CT for SCLC.<br />

Study design: An international multi-centre retrospective analysis of pts who<br />

received 3 lines of CT for SCLC from 2001-2011 was performed. Baseline<br />

demographics, known prognostic factors and CT details were recorded. The main<br />

end-points were response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS) after 3rd-line CT.<br />

Results: A total of 124 eligible pts were identified; 59% male, median age 61, 89%<br />

ECOG 0-1, 40% LD. First-line P-based CT was given to 99% of pts, with a RR of<br />

90%. In <strong>the</strong> 2nd-line, 70 pts (56%) were re-challenged with similar CT, with <strong>the</strong><br />

Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds415 | ix493

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!