24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

abstracts<br />

head and neck cancer<br />

1016O PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED TRIAL (CONCERT-2) OF<br />

PANITUMUMAB (PMAB) PLUS RADIOTHERAPY (PRT)<br />

COMPARED WITH CHEMORADIOTHERAPY (CRT) IN<br />

PATIENTS (PTS) WITH UNRESECTED, LOCALLY ADVANCED<br />

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK<br />

(LASCCHN)<br />

J. Giralt 1 , J.M. Trigo 2 , S. Nuyts 3 , E.M. Ozsahin 4 , K. Skladowski 5 , G. Hatoum 6 ,<br />

J. Daisne 7 , A. Zhang 8 , K. Oliner 9 , A. Vanderwalde 10<br />

1 Radiation Oncology, Vall d`Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, SPAIN,<br />

2 Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, SPAIN,<br />

3 Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BELGIUM, 4 Radiation<br />

Oncology, Lausanne University Medical Center (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire<br />

Vaudois), Lausanne, SWITZERLAND, 5 Radiation Oncology, Centrum Onkologii<br />

Instytut M. Sklodowskiej-Curie, Gliwice, POLAND, 6 Clinical Biomedical Sciences,<br />

Florida Atlantic University, Lake Worth, FL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,<br />

7 Radiation Oncology, Clinique & Maternité Ste-Elisabeth, Namur, BELGIUM,<br />

8 Global Biostatistics, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, UNITED STATES OF<br />

AMERICA, 9 Medical Sciences - Ivd, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, UNITED<br />

STATES OF AMERICA, 10 Oncology Therapeutics, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA,<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

Background: We evaluated <strong>the</strong> safety and efficacy of pmab, a fully human<br />

monoclonal antibody against <strong>the</strong> epidermal growth factor receptor, by comparing<br />

PRT with CRT in pts with LASCCHN.<br />

Methods: Pts with stage III, IVA, or IVB previously untreated LASCCHN of all sites<br />

excluding <strong>the</strong> nasopharynx were randomized 2:3 to open-label CRT or PRT. CRT<br />

included 2 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 during accelerated fractionation<br />

radio<strong>the</strong>rapy (XRT; 70-72 Gy over 6-6.5 weeks). Pmab included 3 cycles at a dose of<br />

9.0 mg/kg with each cycle administered with XRT. This was an estimation study with<br />

no formal hypo<strong>the</strong>sis testing. The primary endpoint was locoregional control (LRC)<br />

rate at 2 years; key secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall<br />

survival (OS), and safety. Preplanned HPV subset analysis (determined by p16<br />

immunohistochemistry) was performed on available samples.<br />

Results: Of 151 treated pts (90 PRT, 61 CRT), 84% were men; median age was 58<br />

years; ECOG PS 0: 64%. Overall, <strong>the</strong> 2-year LRC rate (95% CI) was 51% (40%-62%)<br />

for PRT and 61% (47%-72%) for CRT. For both PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.73 [95%<br />

CI: 1.07-2.81]; p = 0.03) and OS (HR = 1.59 [95% Cl: 0.91-2.79]; p = 0.10), outcomes<br />

favored <strong>the</strong> CRT arm. Of 99 pts with tumors evaluable for HPV, 24% were HPV+. In<br />

75 HPV- tumors, a difference was observed in PFS (HR = 2.04 [95% Cl: 1.05-3.96]; p<br />

= 0.04), with trends also favoring CRT in LRC and OS. Overall, dose intensity was<br />

high for all components of <strong>the</strong>rapy in both arms (median relative dose intensity:<br />

100% for pmab and 99% for cisplatin, median XRT dose: 100% in both arms). Grade<br />

3+ adverse events (AEs) occurred in 85% PRT vs 81% CRT pts. Key differences in<br />

grade 3+ toxicity between arms (PRT, CRT) included skin disorders (which is a<br />

composite of skin-related AEs) (35%, 3%), neutropenia (0%, 13%), and febrile<br />

neutropenia (0%, 8%).<br />

Conclusions: Trends favored <strong>the</strong> CRT arm for <strong>the</strong> primary endpoint (LRC at 2<br />

years), as well as o<strong>the</strong>r measures of efficacy, in this predominantly HPV- LASCCHN<br />

population. Small numbers limit conclusions in <strong>the</strong> HPV+ group. Both PRT and<br />

CRT appeared well tolerated.<br />

Disclosure: G. Hatoum: Advisory Board Member for AmgenK. Oliner: Amgen<br />

stockA. Vanderwalde: Corporate-sponsored research (Amgen), full-time employee of<br />

AmgenAll o<strong>the</strong>r authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

Annals of Oncology 23 (Supplement 9): ix334–ix347, <strong>2012</strong><br />

doi:10.1093/annonc/mds402<br />

1017O PRECLINICAL RATIONAL, SAFETY, AND PRELIMINARY<br />

EFFICACY RESULTS OF WEEKLY EVEROLIMUS,<br />

CARBOPLATIN AND PACLITAXEL AS AN INDUCTION<br />

THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE LOCALLY<br />

ADVANCED HEAD & NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA<br />

(CAPRA): A GERCOR-IRC PHASE I/II STUDY<br />

S. Faivre 1 ,C.Dreyer 1 , E. Raymond 1 , J. Fayette 2 , J.P. Delord 3 , M. Gatineau 4 ,<br />

B. Chibaudel 5 , N. Aissat 5 , K. Slimane 6 , C. Le Tourneau 7<br />

1 Oncology Department, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, FRANCE, 2 Medical<br />

Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, LYON, FRANCE, 3 Clinical Resarch Unit, Centre<br />

Claudius-Regaud, Toulouse, FRANCE, 4 Medical Oncology, Hôpital<br />

Saint-Joseph, Paris, FRANCE, 5 Medical Oncology, GERCOR-IRC, Paris,<br />

FRANCE, 6 Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Rueil-Malmaison, FRANCE,<br />

7 Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Trial Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, FRANCE<br />

Background: PI3K/mTOR is a survival pathway that was shown activated in 57-81%<br />

of patients (pts) with head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and might<br />

drive resistance to cytotoxics.<br />

Methods: We have previously shown synergistic cell-cycle dependent effects between<br />

rapamycin/everolimus and carboplatin, or paclitaxel in HNSCC cells (Aissat 2008).<br />

Based on this preclinical translational rationale, a two-step phase I/II trial was<br />

designed using 9 consecutive weekly (w) cycles of oral everolimus combined with<br />

carboplatin (AUC2) and paclitaxel (60mg/m2) followed by chemoradio<strong>the</strong>rapy in pts<br />

with untreated locally advanced HNSCC.<br />

Results: A total of 27 pts with stage IV HNSCC (median age 58, range 46-84; ECOG<br />

0-2) have been enrolled in this phase I/II study (42 pts scheduled for <strong>the</strong> phase II).<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> 7 pts enrolled in <strong>the</strong> everolimus dose escalation phase I step, 6 pts were<br />

evaluable for safety (3pts at 30 mg/w and 3pts at 50 mg/w). No dose-limiting toxicity<br />

(defined during <strong>the</strong> first 4 weeks of treatment) was reported. Transient asymptomatic<br />

grade 3 neutropenia (3 pts), anemia (3 pts), and thrombocytopenia (1 pt) were observed.<br />

The most frequently reported adverse events were mild to moderate as<strong>the</strong>nia, skin<br />

toxicity, and alopecia. The recommended dose of everolimus for <strong>the</strong> phase II step was 50<br />

mg/w. So far, among pts treated in <strong>the</strong> phase I/II, 11/13 objective responses (1CR, 10 PR,<br />

2SD) were observed in evaluable pts. Interestingly, several major responses (ranging -60<br />

to -80% by RECIST) were observed in large necrotic primary tumors and lymph nodes of<br />

>6cm diameters. Preliminary genetic analysis of tumors showed nei<strong>the</strong>r KRAS, BRAF,<br />

PI3KCA, nor EGFR mutations in tumors responding to this combination.<br />

Conclusions: Weekly 50 mg everolimus combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel<br />

was well tolerated with no DLT, allowing repeated cycles. Major clinical responses in<br />

pts with bulky, locally advanced and necrotic diseases deserve fur<strong>the</strong>r evaluation of<br />

this combination in pts with HNSCC. Updated results will be presented at meeting.<br />

Disclosure: S. Faivre: Novartis, honorarium, compensatedE. Raymond: Novartis,<br />

honorarium, compensatedK. Slimane: Novartis, employment, compensatedAll o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1018O SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CISPLATIN PLUS 5-FU AND<br />

CETUXIMAB IN HPV-POSITIVE AND HPV-NEGATIVE<br />

RECURRENT AND/OR METASTATIC SQUAMOUS CELL<br />

CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK (R/M SCCHN):<br />

ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE III EXTREME TRIAL<br />

A. Psyrri 1 , L. Licitra 2 , B. De Blas 3 , I. Celik 4 , J.B. Vermorken 5<br />

1 Internal Medicine Propaedeutic, University of A<strong>the</strong>ns Medical School, Attikon<br />

University Hospital, A<strong>the</strong>ns, GREECE, 2 Head & Neck Medical Oncology Unit,<br />

Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, ITALY, 3 Global Clinical Development Unit<br />

Oncology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GERMANY, 4 Global Research & Early<br />

Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GERMANY, 5 Department of Medical<br />

Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, BELGIUM<br />

Background: Tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status is a strong predictor of<br />

survival and response to treatment in patients (pts) with early and locally advanced<br />

oropharyngeal cancer, but its effects in R/M SCCHN remain to be clarified. This<br />

retrospective analysis of data from <strong>the</strong> EXTREME trial assessed <strong>the</strong> role of tumor<br />

HPV status in pts with R/M SCCHN receiving cisplatin + 5-FU chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (CT)<br />

alone or in combination with cetuximab. Material and methods:<br />

Immunohistochemical detection of p16 INK4A was used to determine HPV status:<br />

p16-positive and p16-negative disease is referred to as HPV-positive (HPV+) and<br />

HPV-negative (HPV-) disease, respectively.<br />

Results: 196/222 (88%) pts in <strong>the</strong> CT + cetuximab and 185/220 (84%) pts in <strong>the</strong> CT<br />

arm had tissue evaluable for p16. Of <strong>the</strong>se, 91% and 88%, respectively, had HPVtumors.<br />

Among HPV- pts, CT + cetuximab (n = 178) improved overall survival (OS),<br />

progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR), compared with<br />

© European Society for Medical Oncology <strong>2012</strong>. Published by <strong>Oxford</strong> University Press on behalf of <strong>the</strong> European Society for Medical Oncology.<br />

All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!