24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

patients harboring a T/T genotype than for patients with <strong>the</strong> C/C or C/T genotypes<br />

(p= 0.01). In <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> c3158A > C polymorphism, patients harboring a C/C<br />

genotype had a lower OS than patients with an A/A or A/C genotypes (p = 0.047).<br />

Conclusions: In this study, we identified common germline variants in LRIG1 gene<br />

predicting clinical outcome in patients with mCRC receiving first-line<br />

oxaliplatin-based chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

545P MMP-9 AND VEGFR EXPRESSION HAS PROGNOSTIC<br />

SIGNIFICANCE AFTER RESECTION FOR PRIMARY TUMOR<br />

AND METASTATIC SITE IN COLORECTAL CANCER<br />

M.A. Lee 1 , S.T. Oh 2 , W.K. Kang 2 , S.W. Kim 3<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, of <strong>the</strong> Catholic University, Seoul,<br />

KOREA, 2 Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, KOREA, 3 Gastroenterology,<br />

Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, KOREA<br />

Background: Resection for metastatic lesion has been commonly done in stage<br />

colorectal cancer, showing better survival outcome than o<strong>the</strong>r GI malignancy.<br />

Although R0 resection in primary and metastatic lesion is done in stage IV cancer,<br />

recurrence should be developed and cure is rare. In <strong>the</strong> present study, we reviewed<br />

and analyzed <strong>the</strong> protein expression and <strong>the</strong> recurrence to determine <strong>the</strong> prognostic<br />

factor in stage IV colorectal cancer.<br />

Method: Tissue specimens from 130 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were<br />

analyzed. All patients were diagnosed as metastatic colorectal cancer between Jan,<br />

2000 and Aug, 2008 at Seoul St. Mary’s hospital, <strong>the</strong> Catholic University. We<br />

performed immunohistochemical staining using tissue microarray for Wnt 3a, Wnt<br />

5a, VEGFR, and MMP-9. We analyzed <strong>the</strong> clinicopathological characteristics through<br />

<strong>the</strong> medical record and <strong>the</strong> association with protein expressions.<br />

Result: Of <strong>the</strong> 130 patients, Male was 78 (60%), and female was 52 (40%).<br />

Median age was 59.5 years old (range: 27-81). Colon cancer was 76 (58.5%) and<br />

rectal cancer was 54 (41.5%). 94 patients were initially diagnosed as stage IV,<br />

but took curative resection for primary lesion and metastasectomy. The o<strong>the</strong>r 36<br />

patients had recurrent disease as distant metastasis after curative surgery, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n took metastasectomy. The Wnt 5 expression showed <strong>the</strong> tendency of<br />

positive perineural invasion (p = 0.065), but <strong>the</strong>re was no correlation between<br />

protein expression and o<strong>the</strong>r pathological factors. As a prognostic factor for<br />

recurrence, Negative MMP expression showed significantly longer time t o<br />

recurrence (TTR) than positive group (13mon vs, 10 months, p = 0.010) and<br />

VEGFR expression showed a correlation with TTR (15.7 mon for negative vs.<br />

11.1 mon for positive, p = 0.060). There was no correlation between recurrence<br />

and pathological findings such as lymphatic, vascular or perineural invasion, and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r protein expressions.<br />

Conclusion: VEGFR and MMP-9 expression showed prognostic significance for<br />

recurrence in stage IV or recurrent colorectal cancer after metastasectomy. Unlikely<br />

<strong>the</strong> stage III colorectal cancer, pathological findings such as lymphovascular or<br />

perineural invasion did not have association with recurrence.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

546P NEUROPILIN-1 (NRP1) EXPESSION IN TUMOR METASTASIS<br />

OF PRIMARY AND COLORECTAL CANCER: IMPLICATIONS<br />

FOR ANTIANGIOGENIC THERAPY<br />

M.J. Ortiz-Morales1 , C. Morales2 , A. Gómez3 , G. Pulido4 , M.T. Cano Osuna5 ,<br />

J. Jiménez6 , P. Sánchez6 , M. Medina7 , J. De La Haba Rodriguez8 ,E.<br />

Aranda Aguilar8 1<br />

Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />

2<br />

Medicine University, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology,<br />

Córdoba, SPAIN, 3 Medical Oncology, Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />

4<br />

Medical Oncology, Universitary Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />

5<br />

Oncologia Medica, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, SPAIN,<br />

6<br />

Medical Oncology, Universitay Hospital Reina Sofia, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />

7<br />

Pathological Anatomy, Universitary Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />

8<br />

Medical Oncology, Reina Sofía Hospital. Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC),<br />

Cordoba, SPAIN<br />

Introduction and objective: Vascular development is critical in tumor biology and<br />

targeted <strong>the</strong>rapies against angiogenesis process have proven <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>rapeutic efficacy.<br />

Neuropilin-1 (NPR1), a membrane glycoprotein that works as a receptor for<br />

semaphorins, is also a co-receptor for VEGF-A165 and it is expressed in endo<strong>the</strong>lial<br />

cells and in many o<strong>the</strong>r tumors. Very few studies about this protein in primary and<br />

secondary tumors have been reported with contradictory conclusions 1,2 . The aim of<br />

this study is to analyze <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> expression of NRP1 in colorectal<br />

cancer patients in primary tumor and metastases and clinical and pathologic features,<br />

treatment response, progression-free interval and overall survival.<br />

Patients and methods: From 1995 to 2010, 70 patients with available biological<br />

material in paraffin of primary tumor and metastases (liver and/or lung) have been<br />

selected. NRP1 expression was performed using immunohistochemistry with<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

neuropilin-1 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody Catalog # 2621-1 (ATOM) at 1:75<br />

dilution. Vascular endo<strong>the</strong>lium was used as positive control and tumor sample<br />

without antibody as negative control. Clinical and pathological data of patients,<br />

treatments administered, toxicity, response, progression-free interval and overall<br />

survival were registered.<br />

Results: The mean age of patients was 63 years. 51 patients (85%) were<br />

adenocarcinoma and 46 patients (76%) were moderately differentiated. 34 patients<br />

(56.7%) presented metastatic disease at <strong>the</strong> moment of primary tumor diagnosis.<br />

NRP1 expression exists in 100% (120) of samples analyzed.<br />

Conclusions: In our study, in contrast to latest published data 2 , no differences about<br />

intensity and frequency of expression of NRP1 were found between primary and<br />

metastatic samples. It is not possible to establish any relationship between tumor<br />

response to treatment and evolution. References: 1. Parikh AA, Fan F, Liu WB, et al.<br />

Neuropilin-1 in human colon cancer: expression, regulation, and role in induction of<br />

angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 2004;164:2139-51. 2. Jubb AM, Strickland LA, Liu SD,<br />

Mak J, Schmidt M, Koeppen H. Neuropilin-1 expression in cancer and development.<br />

J Pathol <strong>2012</strong>;226:50-60.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

547P PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF COMBINED POSITIVITY OF<br />

LYMPHATIC, VASCULAR, AND PERINEURAL INVASION<br />

(TRIPLE POSITIVE) IN STAGE II/III COLORECTAL CANCER; A<br />

NEW PARADIGM WORTH TO INVESTIGATE?<br />

F. Dane 1 , M.A. Ozturk 1 , M. Koçar 1 , B.M. Atasoy 2 , B. Aktas 1 , F. Telli 1 ,<br />

M. Kanıtez 1 , M. Bes¸irog˘ lu 1 , P.F. Yumuk 1 , S.N. Turhal 1<br />

1 Internal Medicine Dpt., Medical Oncology Div., Marmara University Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Istanbul, TURKEY, 2 Radiation Oncology Dpt., Marmara University<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, TURKEY<br />

Background: Despite <strong>the</strong> studies showing <strong>the</strong> impact of each lymphatic, vascular or<br />

perineural invasion on prognosis separately, <strong>the</strong> exact effect of <strong>the</strong>se parameters in<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r (triple positive) on prognosis is not known. In this study, we assessed <strong>the</strong><br />

pathological features and <strong>the</strong> survival outcomes of triple positive colorectal cancer<br />

patients.<br />

Methods: The files of stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n = 532) who<br />

received adjuvant systemic treatment following curative resection in our center were<br />

analyzed, retrospectively. Tumors with vascular, lymphatic, and perineural invasions<br />

were called triple positive (TP), all o<strong>the</strong>rs were called non-triple positive (NTP)<br />

tumors. Patients with unknown vascular, lymphatic or perineural invasion status (n<br />

= 93) were excluded from <strong>the</strong> analysis. Adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy was consisted of ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

fluorouracil or oxaliplatin-based chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (CT) regimens. Rectal cancer patients<br />

were given adjuvant radiation <strong>the</strong>rapy also. Survival was determined using <strong>the</strong><br />

Kaplan-Meier method, with differences determined by multivariate analysis using <strong>the</strong><br />

Cox multiple hazards model. Results were compared using <strong>the</strong> log-rank test.<br />

Results: A total of 439 patients (243 male: 196 female) with stage II/III colorecral<br />

cancer who received adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy were evaluated retrospectively. The median age<br />

was 60 (range: 23–84 years). Median follow-up was 36 months. Fifteen percent of <strong>the</strong><br />

patients were TP. The rate of TP tumors were 4%, 13,6%, and 29% in T2, T3, and T4<br />

tumors, respectively (p:0.001). The rate of TP tumors were 5,6%, 13,9%, and 40,5%<br />

in N0, N1, and N2 tumors, respectively (p:0.0001). There were no relation between<br />

TP tumors rates and age, gender or tumor localization (p > 0.05). Five years DFS and<br />

OS rates were 37,7% vs 64,7% (p:0.0001) and 53,4% vs 78,1% (p:0.0001) for TP and<br />

NTP tumors, respectively.<br />

Conclusion: Our findings revealed that patients with TP tumors have inferior<br />

survival outcomes when compared to NTP tumors. However results of multivariate<br />

analyses for DFS and cancer specific OS did not support <strong>the</strong> preanalysis hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

of TP being a poor prognostic sign in early stage CRC patients. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we<br />

believe that accurate answer to this question can be given via retrospective analysis of<br />

prospectively collected data from multi-center clinical trials.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

548P MUTATION OF EITHER RAS OR BRAF CORRELATES WITH<br />

MGMT METHYLATION AND MUTATION OF PIK WITH PTEN<br />

METHYLATION, BUT NONE OF THESE IS ASSOCIATED WITH<br />

STAGE IN COLORECTAL CANCER<br />

B. Metzger1 , M.A. Dicato2 , G. Mahon3 , S. Obertin3 , J. Kayser3 1<br />

Laboratory, Foundation for Research on Cancer, Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG,<br />

2<br />

Hematology-Oncology, Hospital Centre of Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG,<br />

3<br />

Foundation for Research On Cancer, Hospital Centre of Luxembourg,<br />

LUXEMBOURG<br />

Background: In a previous study of 222 patients we showed how epigenetic and<br />

genetic changes during oncogenic progression could possibly explain <strong>the</strong> adenomacarcinoma<br />

sequence: first, methylation of promoters of H-cadherin gene followed by<br />

MGMT methylation, K-ras oncogene G to A point mutations, activation of B-raf<br />

gene by a V600E mutation finally methylation of E-cadherin. (ASCO 2011,<br />

ix186 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!