Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
patients harboring a T/T genotype than for patients with <strong>the</strong> C/C or C/T genotypes<br />
(p= 0.01). In <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> c3158A > C polymorphism, patients harboring a C/C<br />
genotype had a lower OS than patients with an A/A or A/C genotypes (p = 0.047).<br />
Conclusions: In this study, we identified common germline variants in LRIG1 gene<br />
predicting clinical outcome in patients with mCRC receiving first-line<br />
oxaliplatin-based chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
545P MMP-9 AND VEGFR EXPRESSION HAS PROGNOSTIC<br />
SIGNIFICANCE AFTER RESECTION FOR PRIMARY TUMOR<br />
AND METASTATIC SITE IN COLORECTAL CANCER<br />
M.A. Lee 1 , S.T. Oh 2 , W.K. Kang 2 , S.W. Kim 3<br />
1 Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, of <strong>the</strong> Catholic University, Seoul,<br />
KOREA, 2 Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, KOREA, 3 Gastroenterology,<br />
Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, KOREA<br />
Background: Resection for metastatic lesion has been commonly done in stage<br />
colorectal cancer, showing better survival outcome than o<strong>the</strong>r GI malignancy.<br />
Although R0 resection in primary and metastatic lesion is done in stage IV cancer,<br />
recurrence should be developed and cure is rare. In <strong>the</strong> present study, we reviewed<br />
and analyzed <strong>the</strong> protein expression and <strong>the</strong> recurrence to determine <strong>the</strong> prognostic<br />
factor in stage IV colorectal cancer.<br />
Method: Tissue specimens from 130 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were<br />
analyzed. All patients were diagnosed as metastatic colorectal cancer between Jan,<br />
2000 and Aug, 2008 at Seoul St. Mary’s hospital, <strong>the</strong> Catholic University. We<br />
performed immunohistochemical staining using tissue microarray for Wnt 3a, Wnt<br />
5a, VEGFR, and MMP-9. We analyzed <strong>the</strong> clinicopathological characteristics through<br />
<strong>the</strong> medical record and <strong>the</strong> association with protein expressions.<br />
Result: Of <strong>the</strong> 130 patients, Male was 78 (60%), and female was 52 (40%).<br />
Median age was 59.5 years old (range: 27-81). Colon cancer was 76 (58.5%) and<br />
rectal cancer was 54 (41.5%). 94 patients were initially diagnosed as stage IV,<br />
but took curative resection for primary lesion and metastasectomy. The o<strong>the</strong>r 36<br />
patients had recurrent disease as distant metastasis after curative surgery, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n took metastasectomy. The Wnt 5 expression showed <strong>the</strong> tendency of<br />
positive perineural invasion (p = 0.065), but <strong>the</strong>re was no correlation between<br />
protein expression and o<strong>the</strong>r pathological factors. As a prognostic factor for<br />
recurrence, Negative MMP expression showed significantly longer time t o<br />
recurrence (TTR) than positive group (13mon vs, 10 months, p = 0.010) and<br />
VEGFR expression showed a correlation with TTR (15.7 mon for negative vs.<br />
11.1 mon for positive, p = 0.060). There was no correlation between recurrence<br />
and pathological findings such as lymphatic, vascular or perineural invasion, and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r protein expressions.<br />
Conclusion: VEGFR and MMP-9 expression showed prognostic significance for<br />
recurrence in stage IV or recurrent colorectal cancer after metastasectomy. Unlikely<br />
<strong>the</strong> stage III colorectal cancer, pathological findings such as lymphovascular or<br />
perineural invasion did not have association with recurrence.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
546P NEUROPILIN-1 (NRP1) EXPESSION IN TUMOR METASTASIS<br />
OF PRIMARY AND COLORECTAL CANCER: IMPLICATIONS<br />
FOR ANTIANGIOGENIC THERAPY<br />
M.J. Ortiz-Morales1 , C. Morales2 , A. Gómez3 , G. Pulido4 , M.T. Cano Osuna5 ,<br />
J. Jiménez6 , P. Sánchez6 , M. Medina7 , J. De La Haba Rodriguez8 ,E.<br />
Aranda Aguilar8 1<br />
Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />
2<br />
Medicine University, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology,<br />
Córdoba, SPAIN, 3 Medical Oncology, Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />
4<br />
Medical Oncology, Universitary Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />
5<br />
Oncologia Medica, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, SPAIN,<br />
6<br />
Medical Oncology, Universitay Hospital Reina Sofia, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />
7<br />
Pathological Anatomy, Universitary Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, SPAIN,<br />
8<br />
Medical Oncology, Reina Sofía Hospital. Biomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC),<br />
Cordoba, SPAIN<br />
Introduction and objective: Vascular development is critical in tumor biology and<br />
targeted <strong>the</strong>rapies against angiogenesis process have proven <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>rapeutic efficacy.<br />
Neuropilin-1 (NPR1), a membrane glycoprotein that works as a receptor for<br />
semaphorins, is also a co-receptor for VEGF-A165 and it is expressed in endo<strong>the</strong>lial<br />
cells and in many o<strong>the</strong>r tumors. Very few studies about this protein in primary and<br />
secondary tumors have been reported with contradictory conclusions 1,2 . The aim of<br />
this study is to analyze <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> expression of NRP1 in colorectal<br />
cancer patients in primary tumor and metastases and clinical and pathologic features,<br />
treatment response, progression-free interval and overall survival.<br />
Patients and methods: From 1995 to 2010, 70 patients with available biological<br />
material in paraffin of primary tumor and metastases (liver and/or lung) have been<br />
selected. NRP1 expression was performed using immunohistochemistry with<br />
Annals of Oncology<br />
neuropilin-1 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody Catalog # 2621-1 (ATOM) at 1:75<br />
dilution. Vascular endo<strong>the</strong>lium was used as positive control and tumor sample<br />
without antibody as negative control. Clinical and pathological data of patients,<br />
treatments administered, toxicity, response, progression-free interval and overall<br />
survival were registered.<br />
Results: The mean age of patients was 63 years. 51 patients (85%) were<br />
adenocarcinoma and 46 patients (76%) were moderately differentiated. 34 patients<br />
(56.7%) presented metastatic disease at <strong>the</strong> moment of primary tumor diagnosis.<br />
NRP1 expression exists in 100% (120) of samples analyzed.<br />
Conclusions: In our study, in contrast to latest published data 2 , no differences about<br />
intensity and frequency of expression of NRP1 were found between primary and<br />
metastatic samples. It is not possible to establish any relationship between tumor<br />
response to treatment and evolution. References: 1. Parikh AA, Fan F, Liu WB, et al.<br />
Neuropilin-1 in human colon cancer: expression, regulation, and role in induction of<br />
angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 2004;164:2139-51. 2. Jubb AM, Strickland LA, Liu SD,<br />
Mak J, Schmidt M, Koeppen H. Neuropilin-1 expression in cancer and development.<br />
J Pathol <strong>2012</strong>;226:50-60.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
547P PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF COMBINED POSITIVITY OF<br />
LYMPHATIC, VASCULAR, AND PERINEURAL INVASION<br />
(TRIPLE POSITIVE) IN STAGE II/III COLORECTAL CANCER; A<br />
NEW PARADIGM WORTH TO INVESTIGATE?<br />
F. Dane 1 , M.A. Ozturk 1 , M. Koçar 1 , B.M. Atasoy 2 , B. Aktas 1 , F. Telli 1 ,<br />
M. Kanıtez 1 , M. Bes¸irog˘ lu 1 , P.F. Yumuk 1 , S.N. Turhal 1<br />
1 Internal Medicine Dpt., Medical Oncology Div., Marmara University Faculty of<br />
Medicine, Istanbul, TURKEY, 2 Radiation Oncology Dpt., Marmara University<br />
Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, TURKEY<br />
Background: Despite <strong>the</strong> studies showing <strong>the</strong> impact of each lymphatic, vascular or<br />
perineural invasion on prognosis separately, <strong>the</strong> exact effect of <strong>the</strong>se parameters in<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r (triple positive) on prognosis is not known. In this study, we assessed <strong>the</strong><br />
pathological features and <strong>the</strong> survival outcomes of triple positive colorectal cancer<br />
patients.<br />
Methods: The files of stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n = 532) who<br />
received adjuvant systemic treatment following curative resection in our center were<br />
analyzed, retrospectively. Tumors with vascular, lymphatic, and perineural invasions<br />
were called triple positive (TP), all o<strong>the</strong>rs were called non-triple positive (NTP)<br />
tumors. Patients with unknown vascular, lymphatic or perineural invasion status (n<br />
= 93) were excluded from <strong>the</strong> analysis. Adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy was consisted of ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
fluorouracil or oxaliplatin-based chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (CT) regimens. Rectal cancer patients<br />
were given adjuvant radiation <strong>the</strong>rapy also. Survival was determined using <strong>the</strong><br />
Kaplan-Meier method, with differences determined by multivariate analysis using <strong>the</strong><br />
Cox multiple hazards model. Results were compared using <strong>the</strong> log-rank test.<br />
Results: A total of 439 patients (243 male: 196 female) with stage II/III colorecral<br />
cancer who received adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy were evaluated retrospectively. The median age<br />
was 60 (range: 23–84 years). Median follow-up was 36 months. Fifteen percent of <strong>the</strong><br />
patients were TP. The rate of TP tumors were 4%, 13,6%, and 29% in T2, T3, and T4<br />
tumors, respectively (p:0.001). The rate of TP tumors were 5,6%, 13,9%, and 40,5%<br />
in N0, N1, and N2 tumors, respectively (p:0.0001). There were no relation between<br />
TP tumors rates and age, gender or tumor localization (p > 0.05). Five years DFS and<br />
OS rates were 37,7% vs 64,7% (p:0.0001) and 53,4% vs 78,1% (p:0.0001) for TP and<br />
NTP tumors, respectively.<br />
Conclusion: Our findings revealed that patients with TP tumors have inferior<br />
survival outcomes when compared to NTP tumors. However results of multivariate<br />
analyses for DFS and cancer specific OS did not support <strong>the</strong> preanalysis hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />
of TP being a poor prognostic sign in early stage CRC patients. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we<br />
believe that accurate answer to this question can be given via retrospective analysis of<br />
prospectively collected data from multi-center clinical trials.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
548P MUTATION OF EITHER RAS OR BRAF CORRELATES WITH<br />
MGMT METHYLATION AND MUTATION OF PIK WITH PTEN<br />
METHYLATION, BUT NONE OF THESE IS ASSOCIATED WITH<br />
STAGE IN COLORECTAL CANCER<br />
B. Metzger1 , M.A. Dicato2 , G. Mahon3 , S. Obertin3 , J. Kayser3 1<br />
Laboratory, Foundation for Research on Cancer, Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG,<br />
2<br />
Hematology-Oncology, Hospital Centre of Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG,<br />
3<br />
Foundation for Research On Cancer, Hospital Centre of Luxembourg,<br />
LUXEMBOURG<br />
Background: In a previous study of 222 patients we showed how epigenetic and<br />
genetic changes during oncogenic progression could possibly explain <strong>the</strong> adenomacarcinoma<br />
sequence: first, methylation of promoters of H-cadherin gene followed by<br />
MGMT methylation, K-ras oncogene G to A point mutations, activation of B-raf<br />
gene by a V600E mutation finally methylation of E-cadherin. (ASCO 2011,<br />
ix186 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>