24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pts. Poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma (PDEC). Age (median) 54 a. (r<br />

18-84). Primary Location: small intestine 40, pancreas 26 pts. Appendix 9 pts.,<br />

Stomach 8, rectum 6, unknown 6, colon 4, and esophagus 1 pte. Metastatic disease<br />

76 pts., Localized disease in 24 pts. The expression of SSTR was: Subtype 2 (positive<br />

80 pts.) and subtype 5 (positive 46 pts.). Ki 67 was less than or equal to 2% in 36<br />

pts., between 3 and 15%, 49 pts. and more than 15% in 12 pts. 26/100 pts. had<br />

functioning tumors. The analysis included 55 pts. with SSTR 2 / 5 pos. Ki 67 less<br />

than or equal to 2% (Group 1), 38 pts. with SSTR 2 / 5 pos and Ki 67 more than 2%<br />

(Group 2), 5 pts. with SSTR 2 / 5 neg. Ki 67 less than or equal to 2% (Group 3) and<br />

2 pts. with SSTR 2 / 5 neg and Ki 67 more than 2% (Group 4). Univariate analysis<br />

showed significant differences for <strong>the</strong> expression of SSTR 2 (p. 009), and Ki 67<br />

(p. 001). Survival was higher in Group 1 versus Group 2, median OS was 97 months<br />

vs 49 months, and 36 to 23 months, in groups 3 and 4 respectively (p. 0001).<br />

Conclusions: In this population of pts with GEP-NET we could identify a subgroup<br />

of better prognosis associated with expression of SSTR 2 / 5 and Ki 67 less than or<br />

equal to 2%. The assessment of SSTR 2 and 5 in tissue, and proliferative index are<br />

useful tools for evaluating prognosis in this setting.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1165P EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SOMATULINE AUTOGEL IN<br />

COMBINATION WITH MOLECULAR TARGETED THERAPIES<br />

(MTT) IN NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS (NETS)<br />

J. Capdevila 1 , I. Sevilla 2 , V. Alonso 3 , L. Anton-Aparicio 4 , P. Jimenez Fonseca 5 ,<br />

E. Grande 6 , J.J. Reina 7 , J.L. Manzano 8 , J. Alonso-Jara 9 , P. García Alfonso 10<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, SPAIN,<br />

2 Medical Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Malaga, SPAIN,<br />

3 Medical Oncology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, SPAIN,<br />

4 Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario A Coruña, A Coruña, SPAIN, 5 Medical<br />

Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, SPAIN, 6 Medical<br />

Oncology, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, SPAIN, 7 Medical<br />

Oncology, Virgen de la Macarena University Hospital, Sevilla, SPAIN, 8 Medical<br />

Oncology, ICO Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, SPAIN, 9 Medical<br />

Oncology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, SPAIN, 10 Medical<br />

Oncology, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, SPAIN<br />

Background: Analysis of <strong>the</strong> mechanisms of action of somatostatin analogs (SSAs)<br />

and mTOR inhibitors or multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors have suggested that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

may provide synergistic effects when used in combination for <strong>the</strong> treatment of<br />

patients with NETs.<br />

Methods: This is a Spanish Multicenter cohort of patients (pts) with NETs treated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> SSAs lanreotide (LAN) and MTTs at 35 Spanish Medical Oncology<br />

Departments. The data of 159 combined treatments (133 pts) was retrospectively<br />

collected in order to evaluate <strong>the</strong> efficacy and safety of such combinations out of trials.<br />

Results: 133 pts (52,6% Male) with a mean age of 59,4 years; ECOG 0/1/2/3: 34%/<br />

49%/16%/1%; Lung/Pancreas/Gastrointestinal//Unknown(UK)origin: 9%/48% /32%/<br />

11%; G1/G2/G3/UK: 41%/32%/1%/26%; Non Functioning/ Functioning (69%/31%)<br />

received treatment with MTT + LAN for synergistic antiproliferative purpose in 85%<br />

of <strong>the</strong> cases, hormonal control (13,5%) or both objectives (1,5%). 115 pts received<br />

just one and 18 pts received between 2 (12 pts) and 5 (1 pt) combination treatments.<br />

LAN was administrated in combination with everolimus (46%), sunitinib (38%),<br />

bevazucimab (6%), sorafenib (5%) and pazopanib (5%). The reported toxicity was<br />

determined by <strong>the</strong> MTT profile with no significant additional severe adverse events<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> combination with LAN. The median progression-free survival (mPFS)<br />

for <strong>the</strong> two main groups was 31.9 months for those pts who received LAN and<br />

sunitinib (n = 50) and 21.9 months for those pts who received LAN and everolimus<br />

(n = 56).<br />

Conclusions: The combination of LAN and MTT treatments, mainly everolimus and<br />

sunitinib, is widely used in clinical practice without unexpected toxicities. Although<br />

studies are not directly comparable mPFS observed in <strong>the</strong> two main groups were<br />

higher than data showed by phase III studies with sunitinib, everolimus or SSAs<br />

alone raising <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis of enhanced antitumor efficacy combining SSAs and<br />

MTT that should be confirmed in randomized prospective clinical trials.<br />

Tumor Response (%)<br />

Nº PD SD PR CR Not evaluated<br />

61 Sunit +LAN 4.9 68.9 14.8 1.6 9.8<br />

73 Evero +LAN 12.3 67.0 15.1 0 5.5<br />

9 Bevac +LAN 0 88.9 11.1 0 0<br />

8 Soraf +LAN 0 100.0 0 0 0<br />

8 Pazop +LAN 12.5 75.0 12.5 0 0<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

1166P AWARENESS OF THE CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND<br />

DIAGNOSIS OF NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS IN AN<br />

AUSTRALIAN GENERAL PHYSICIAN POPULATION<br />

J.C. Leyden<br />

Anaes<strong>the</strong>sia, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, AUSTRALIA<br />

Background: Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) are a rare group of malignancies<br />

where <strong>the</strong> correct diagnosis is often delayed for many years resulting in local and<br />

distant spread of <strong>the</strong> disease and mean 5 year survival rate of 30%. The diagnosis<br />

of NETs is challanging and requires <strong>the</strong> expertise of many medical specialists and<br />

diagnostic modalities. The General Physician (GP) is pivotal for early recognition,<br />

referral and management of this disease. The Unicorn Foundation, Australia’s only<br />

charity directed to NET patient support, advocacy and research conducted a<br />

survey of Australian Physicians to determine knowledge of NETs. A secondary<br />

objective of <strong>the</strong> survey was to raise awareness of <strong>the</strong> disease in a broad medical<br />

population.<br />

Methods: 9952 registered medical practitioners received an introductory email<br />

requesting participation in <strong>the</strong> online “NET Awareness Survey”. The questions were<br />

presented as ‘best answer’ multiple choice format with <strong>the</strong> ability to choose ‘not sure’<br />

as an option. 26 questions covering basic NET epidemiology, clinical pathology and<br />

presentation, diagnosis and referral pattern were included.<br />

Results: The survey was open from July 2011 until December 2011. A population of<br />

9552 registered medical practitioners received <strong>the</strong> email; 38% (3630) ‘opened’ <strong>the</strong><br />

email and 7% (655) completed <strong>the</strong> survey. Of <strong>the</strong> survey respondants, 65% (425)<br />

were General Physicians. The results of <strong>the</strong> survey indicated a lack of awareness/<br />

knowledge regarding NET epidemiology; pathology; spectrum of disease (including<br />

metastatic potential) and use of Chromogranin A as a biomarker of <strong>the</strong> disease. The<br />

majority of <strong>the</strong> respondants acknowledged <strong>the</strong> difficulties of diagnosis; <strong>the</strong> myriad<br />

presenting symptoms and association of NETs with familial syndromes.<br />

Conclusion: The survey results showed that a significant proportion of General<br />

Physicians had minimal knowledge of Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

behaviour and <strong>the</strong>re was a general misunderstanding of appropriate investigations to<br />

facilitate diagnosis. Improved awareness of <strong>the</strong> NETs and investigative strategies to<br />

improve diagnosis are needed amongst medical practitioners especially those in<br />

general practice.<br />

Disclosure: J.C. Leyden: This research project has been supported by unrestricted<br />

educational grant from Novartis Oncology, Ipsen Pharmaceutical and Pfizer<br />

Pharmaceutical.<br />

1167P NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS: A REVIEW OF THE<br />

SUNNYBROOK ODETTE CANCER CENTRE DATABASE<br />

J. Craig 1 , M. Cheung 2 ,C.Law 3 , S. Singh 4<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, CANADA,<br />

2 Hematology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre,<br />

Toronto, ON, CANADA, 3 Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook<br />

Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, CANADA, 4 Medical Oncology, Odette<br />

Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, CANADA<br />

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are an uncommon and heterogeneous<br />

group of malignancies. A number of reviews have been published attempting to<br />

better identify factors of important prognostic significance in predicting overall<br />

survival, however <strong>the</strong>se studies are often limited by small sample size and were<br />

published before new <strong>the</strong>rapy options came into widespread use. AIMS: We reviewed<br />

our experience at our NETs multidisciplinary reference centre in <strong>the</strong> management of<br />

NETs to attempt to identify important patient and tumor characteristics associated<br />

with improved overall survival.<br />

Methods: The Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre NETs Database was retrospectively<br />

reviewed. All patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NET were<br />

included in <strong>the</strong> analysis. Patient characteristics, tumor markers and pathology,<br />

treatment, and response to treatment were recorded. Univariate and multivariate<br />

Cox-regression analyses were performed.<br />

Results: A total of 327 patients were included in <strong>the</strong> analysis. Mean age at presentation<br />

was 55.6 years. A total of 159 (48.6%) patients were male. The most common primary<br />

site was small bowel (34.3%), followed by pancreas (21.1%) and large bowel/rectum/<br />

anus (11.9%). In univariate analysis, factors associated with improved overall survival<br />

included local/regional disease at presentation (p < 0.001), lower Ki67 index<br />

(p < 0.001), normal chromogranin A at presentation (p = 0.008), urinary<br />

5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid drop following treatment (p = 0.024), symptom response to<br />

treatment (p < 0.001), surgery on <strong>the</strong> primary tumor (p < 0.001), surgery on metastases<br />

(p = 0.003), having multiple surgeries (p < 0.001), and treatment with long-acting<br />

somatostatin (LAS) (p = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, treatment with LAS (p <<br />

0.001, HR 0.141, 95%CI 0.064-0.31) and having multiple surgeries (p = 0.045, HR<br />

0.591, CI 0.354-0.988) were shown to be independent predictors of improved overall<br />

survival.<br />

ix380 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!