Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annals of Oncology<br />
only one course of carboplatin. We experienced grade 3 side effects in 4 patients<br />
(vomiting, low platelets, neutropenia, deep vein thrombosis). No toxicity of higher<br />
grade developed. Seven patients relapsed. All relapses occurred in <strong>the</strong> retroperitoneal<br />
lymph nodes. In two patients, <strong>the</strong> retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were<br />
discovered after <strong>the</strong> first cycle of carboplatin, so <strong>the</strong>se cases are not considered real<br />
relapses, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> mistake of <strong>the</strong> initial staging. To conclude, single agent<br />
carboplatin proved to be a safe and effective treatment. The risk adapted strategy is<br />
not consistently used in our everyday practice. We aim to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />
initial staging to avoid false stage I assessments. We also have to promote <strong>the</strong> more<br />
accurate pathologic examination of <strong>the</strong> specimens to be able to correctly inform <strong>the</strong><br />
patients on <strong>the</strong> risk of relapse and thus enable <strong>the</strong>m to make a fully informed<br />
decision on <strong>the</strong>ir adjuvant treatment.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
868 PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH<br />
FACTOR RECEPTOR OVEREXPRESSION AND CHROMOSOME<br />
7 POLYSOMY IN CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA<br />
F. Lumachi 1 , D. Santeufemia 2 , F. Pili 3 , S.M. M. Basso 4 ,G.LoRe 5 , G. Miolo 6 ,<br />
G.B. Chiara 4 , M. Ermani 7 , S. Tumolo 2 , P. Rocca Cossu 3<br />
1 Department of Surgical, Oncological & Gastroenterological Sciences (discog),<br />
University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, ITALY, 2 Medical Oncology,<br />
S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, ITALY, 3 Department of Pathology,<br />
University of Sassari, Sassari, ITALY, 4 Chirurgia 1, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital,<br />
Pordenone, ITALY, 5 Oncology, Medical Oncology, Pordenone, ITALY, 6 Centro<br />
Riferimento Oncologico (cro), Medical Oncology, Aviano, ITALY, 7 University of<br />
Padua, Department of Neurosciences, Padova, ITALY<br />
Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is <strong>the</strong> most common<br />
histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma. In patients with ccRCC several<br />
prognostic markers have been suggested, enclosing epidermal growth factor receptor<br />
(EGFR) expression and chromosome 7 polysomy (C7p). Cancer cells addicted to<br />
EGFR bear activated mutations in <strong>the</strong> EGFR gene, and <strong>the</strong>se mutations are useful in<br />
predicting susceptibility of ccRCC to EGFR inhibitors. The aim of this study was to<br />
evaluate <strong>the</strong> prognostic value of EGFR overexpression and C7p.<br />
Patients and methods: Archival specimens, coupled with clinical and survival data<br />
of 34 patients (20 men, 14 women, median age 58, range 42–79 years) who had<br />
undergone radical nephrectomy for ccRCC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry<br />
and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) specimens were sections of<br />
formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. EGFR expression was detected as<br />
membranous and cytoplasmic staining of neoplastic cells > 1%, and a ratio between<br />
gene/centromeric signals of more than two was considered to indicate gene<br />
amplification. Mean number of centromeric signals per nucleus was also scored to<br />
evaluate C7p. The log-rank test was used to examine <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />
gender, EGFR overexpression, C7p and survival. Kaplan-Meyer analysis was<br />
performed to compare parameters with survival.<br />
Results: The age did not differ significantly (p = 0.79) between men and women.<br />
Overall, <strong>the</strong> median survival was 46 months (range 5-150 months). C7p was<br />
observed in 21 (61.8%) cases. The log-rank test showed a significantly (p = 0.01)<br />
shorter survival among men in respect of women. We did not find any relationship<br />
between survival and membranous (p = 0.32) or cytoplasmic (p = 0.51) EGFR<br />
overexpression, while C7p significantly (p = 0.02) correlated with survival. Similarly,<br />
no correlation was found (Cox’s regression) between EGFR overexpression and<br />
survival (R = 0.41, p = 0.21), while <strong>the</strong> relationship with gender (R = 0.87, p < 0.01)<br />
was confirmed.<br />
Conclusions: In our preliminary study, women with ccRCC had an overall better<br />
survival than men. EGFR was not a useful predictor of outcome, while C7p may have<br />
a prognostic significance.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
869 ANGIOGENIC AND SIGNALLING PROTEINS CORRELATE<br />
RESISTANCE AND SEQUENCE OF TREATMENT IN RENAL<br />
CELL CANCER<br />
R. Rosa 1 , V. Damiano 1 , L. Nappi 1 , L. Formisano 1 , F. Massari 2 , A. Scarpa 3 ,<br />
G. Martignoni 4 , R. Bianco 1 , G. Tortora 2<br />
1 Medical Oncology, University Federico II, Napoli, ITALY, 2 Medical Oncology,<br />
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona-“Borgo Roma”, Verona,<br />
ITALY, 3 Patologia e Diagnostica, Universit, Verona, ITALY, 4 Pathology and<br />
Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, ITALY<br />
Background: The multi-tyrosine kinases inhibitors and <strong>the</strong> mammalian target of<br />
rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have dramatically changed <strong>the</strong> management of<br />
metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, a relevant issue in RCC treatment is<br />
still <strong>the</strong> lack of a biological and molecular rationale able to establish <strong>the</strong> most<br />
effective sequence of <strong>the</strong> different <strong>the</strong>rapeutic options available.<br />
Methods: To address this issue, we systematically assessed <strong>the</strong> effect of different<br />
agents, alone and in sequence, on <strong>the</strong> growth, expression and secretion of key<br />
angiogenic and signalling proteins involved in tumor growth and resistance to<br />
treatment, in a panel of human RCC cell lines with different VHL status and in<br />
tumors xenografted in nude mice.<br />
Results: We demonstrated that sunitinib, sorafenib and everolimus are equally active<br />
as single agents in inhibiting cell proliferation, signal transduction and VEGF<br />
secretion, both in vitro and in tumors grown in mice. Pre-treatment of tumor cells<br />
with sunitinib reduced <strong>the</strong> response to subsequent sunitinib and sorafenib but not to<br />
everolimus. Lack by sunitinib of a persistent inhibition of key proteins including<br />
HIF-1, VEGF and MAPK anticipates onset of resistance in xenografted tumors. After<br />
first line sunitinib, second line everolimus was more effective than sorafenib or<br />
sunitinib rechallenge to interfere with critical signalling proteins and VEGF and<br />
Interleukin-8 secretion, translating into an advantage in <strong>the</strong> long-lasting inhibition of<br />
tumor growth and significant prolongation of mice survival.<br />
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that angiogenic and signalling proteins predict<br />
treatment failure with sunitinib and that <strong>the</strong> use of mTOR inhibitor everolimus in<br />
second line is substantiated by a persistent control of proteins responsible for RCC<br />
growth and resistance to treatment.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
870 COMPLIANCE WITH SUNITINIB TREATMENT IN PATIENTS<br />
WITH RENAL CELL CANCER<br />
A. De Both 1 , V. Kruse 2 , E. De Coene 2 , N. Clottens 3 , A. Somers 3 , S. van Belle 2 ,<br />
L. van Bortel 4 , S. Rottey 2<br />
1 Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 2 Medical<br />
Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 3 Pharamcy, University<br />
Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 4 Clinical Pharamcy, University Hospital Ghent,<br />
Ghent, BELGIUM<br />
Introduction: Sunitinib (SUN) is one of <strong>the</strong> standard treatment options for<br />
metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). There are several possible reasons for<br />
non-compliance to <strong>the</strong> prescribed doses: oral intake of <strong>the</strong> drug, side effects and <strong>the</strong><br />
existence of multiple dosage forms. Prescribers are not always aware of this<br />
non-compliance.<br />
Methods: In Belgium SUN can only be delivered by <strong>the</strong> hospital pharmacy. This<br />
allows calculation of <strong>the</strong> used versus <strong>the</strong> prescribed dose. Based on <strong>the</strong>se data, <strong>the</strong><br />
minimum number of non-compliant weeks per patient were calculated.<br />
Results: 34 incident patients were considered, treated in <strong>the</strong> Ghent University<br />
Hospital between 2007–<strong>2012</strong>. The total number of treatment weeks for this patient<br />
group was 1079 (ranging between 1 and 108 weeks). A total of 850 weeks were<br />
suitable for analysis. 14 out of <strong>the</strong>se 34 patients (41.2%) had at least one week in<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir treatment period of non-compliance (insufficient number of pills), with <strong>the</strong><br />
percentage of time of treatment non-compliance in <strong>the</strong>se individual patients ranging<br />
from 2–40 % of <strong>the</strong> total treatment time, <strong>the</strong> average being 19 % of <strong>the</strong> weeks. The<br />
group with one or more weeks of non-compliance were <strong>the</strong> patients with <strong>the</strong> longest<br />
SUN intake: 47.2 versus 20.8 months of intake. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand 5/34 patients<br />
(14.7%) received considerably more pills from <strong>the</strong> pharmacy than <strong>the</strong>ir treatment<br />
regimen warranted.<br />
Conclusions: In our single-center database of patients treated by SUN for mRCC, we<br />
demonstrated that over 40% of <strong>the</strong> patients were possibly non-compliant with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
prescribed SUN dose. This occurred more frequently in long-term treatment. Given<br />
<strong>the</strong> average non-compliance time in this subgroup (19% of <strong>the</strong> weeks) we can<br />
conclude that this might significantly influence overall survival and response to<br />
treatment. We thus advocate a tighter patient follow-up and a control of drug<br />
prescription and delivery, which could result in detection of non-compliance more<br />
rapidly.<br />
Disclosure: S. Rottey: Advisory board Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, GSK Research grant<br />
Pfizer, Bayer. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
872 COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SUNITINIB VERSUS SORAFENIB<br />
AS THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH<br />
METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA<br />
S.J. Park1 , J. Lee2 , I. Park2 , K. Park2 , J. Ahn2 , D.H. Lee2 , C. Song3 , J.H. Hong3 ,<br />
C. Kim3 , H. Ahn3 1 2<br />
Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, KOREA, Department of Oncology,<br />
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, KOREA,<br />
3<br />
Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of<br />
Medicine, Seoul, KOREA<br />
Background: Sunitinib has been recommended as <strong>the</strong> primary treatment in <strong>the</strong><br />
patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) among <strong>the</strong> vascular endo<strong>the</strong>lial<br />
growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI). However, <strong>the</strong>re are no published<br />
clinical data that compared directly <strong>the</strong> efficacy of targeted agents in <strong>the</strong> first line<br />
setting. This study investigated <strong>the</strong> efficacy and toxicity of sorafenib and sunitinib as<br />
primary treatment for patients with mRCC.<br />
Methods: To compare <strong>the</strong> efficacy and toxicities between sorafenib and sunitinb,<br />
clinical database was used to identify all patients with mRCC treated with VEGF<br />
TKIs in Asan Medical Center from April 2005 to March 2011. Among 304 patients,<br />
Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds399 | ix287