24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annals of Oncology<br />

only one course of carboplatin. We experienced grade 3 side effects in 4 patients<br />

(vomiting, low platelets, neutropenia, deep vein thrombosis). No toxicity of higher<br />

grade developed. Seven patients relapsed. All relapses occurred in <strong>the</strong> retroperitoneal<br />

lymph nodes. In two patients, <strong>the</strong> retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were<br />

discovered after <strong>the</strong> first cycle of carboplatin, so <strong>the</strong>se cases are not considered real<br />

relapses, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> mistake of <strong>the</strong> initial staging. To conclude, single agent<br />

carboplatin proved to be a safe and effective treatment. The risk adapted strategy is<br />

not consistently used in our everyday practice. We aim to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />

initial staging to avoid false stage I assessments. We also have to promote <strong>the</strong> more<br />

accurate pathologic examination of <strong>the</strong> specimens to be able to correctly inform <strong>the</strong><br />

patients on <strong>the</strong> risk of relapse and thus enable <strong>the</strong>m to make a fully informed<br />

decision on <strong>the</strong>ir adjuvant treatment.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

868 PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH<br />

FACTOR RECEPTOR OVEREXPRESSION AND CHROMOSOME<br />

7 POLYSOMY IN CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA<br />

F. Lumachi 1 , D. Santeufemia 2 , F. Pili 3 , S.M. M. Basso 4 ,G.LoRe 5 , G. Miolo 6 ,<br />

G.B. Chiara 4 , M. Ermani 7 , S. Tumolo 2 , P. Rocca Cossu 3<br />

1 Department of Surgical, Oncological & Gastroenterological Sciences (discog),<br />

University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, ITALY, 2 Medical Oncology,<br />

S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, ITALY, 3 Department of Pathology,<br />

University of Sassari, Sassari, ITALY, 4 Chirurgia 1, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital,<br />

Pordenone, ITALY, 5 Oncology, Medical Oncology, Pordenone, ITALY, 6 Centro<br />

Riferimento Oncologico (cro), Medical Oncology, Aviano, ITALY, 7 University of<br />

Padua, Department of Neurosciences, Padova, ITALY<br />

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is <strong>the</strong> most common<br />

histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma. In patients with ccRCC several<br />

prognostic markers have been suggested, enclosing epidermal growth factor receptor<br />

(EGFR) expression and chromosome 7 polysomy (C7p). Cancer cells addicted to<br />

EGFR bear activated mutations in <strong>the</strong> EGFR gene, and <strong>the</strong>se mutations are useful in<br />

predicting susceptibility of ccRCC to EGFR inhibitors. The aim of this study was to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> prognostic value of EGFR overexpression and C7p.<br />

Patients and methods: Archival specimens, coupled with clinical and survival data<br />

of 34 patients (20 men, 14 women, median age 58, range 42–79 years) who had<br />

undergone radical nephrectomy for ccRCC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry<br />

and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) specimens were sections of<br />

formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. EGFR expression was detected as<br />

membranous and cytoplasmic staining of neoplastic cells > 1%, and a ratio between<br />

gene/centromeric signals of more than two was considered to indicate gene<br />

amplification. Mean number of centromeric signals per nucleus was also scored to<br />

evaluate C7p. The log-rank test was used to examine <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />

gender, EGFR overexpression, C7p and survival. Kaplan-Meyer analysis was<br />

performed to compare parameters with survival.<br />

Results: The age did not differ significantly (p = 0.79) between men and women.<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> median survival was 46 months (range 5-150 months). C7p was<br />

observed in 21 (61.8%) cases. The log-rank test showed a significantly (p = 0.01)<br />

shorter survival among men in respect of women. We did not find any relationship<br />

between survival and membranous (p = 0.32) or cytoplasmic (p = 0.51) EGFR<br />

overexpression, while C7p significantly (p = 0.02) correlated with survival. Similarly,<br />

no correlation was found (Cox’s regression) between EGFR overexpression and<br />

survival (R = 0.41, p = 0.21), while <strong>the</strong> relationship with gender (R = 0.87, p < 0.01)<br />

was confirmed.<br />

Conclusions: In our preliminary study, women with ccRCC had an overall better<br />

survival than men. EGFR was not a useful predictor of outcome, while C7p may have<br />

a prognostic significance.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

869 ANGIOGENIC AND SIGNALLING PROTEINS CORRELATE<br />

RESISTANCE AND SEQUENCE OF TREATMENT IN RENAL<br />

CELL CANCER<br />

R. Rosa 1 , V. Damiano 1 , L. Nappi 1 , L. Formisano 1 , F. Massari 2 , A. Scarpa 3 ,<br />

G. Martignoni 4 , R. Bianco 1 , G. Tortora 2<br />

1 Medical Oncology, University Federico II, Napoli, ITALY, 2 Medical Oncology,<br />

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona-“Borgo Roma”, Verona,<br />

ITALY, 3 Patologia e Diagnostica, Universit, Verona, ITALY, 4 Pathology and<br />

Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, ITALY<br />

Background: The multi-tyrosine kinases inhibitors and <strong>the</strong> mammalian target of<br />

rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have dramatically changed <strong>the</strong> management of<br />

metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, a relevant issue in RCC treatment is<br />

still <strong>the</strong> lack of a biological and molecular rationale able to establish <strong>the</strong> most<br />

effective sequence of <strong>the</strong> different <strong>the</strong>rapeutic options available.<br />

Methods: To address this issue, we systematically assessed <strong>the</strong> effect of different<br />

agents, alone and in sequence, on <strong>the</strong> growth, expression and secretion of key<br />

angiogenic and signalling proteins involved in tumor growth and resistance to<br />

treatment, in a panel of human RCC cell lines with different VHL status and in<br />

tumors xenografted in nude mice.<br />

Results: We demonstrated that sunitinib, sorafenib and everolimus are equally active<br />

as single agents in inhibiting cell proliferation, signal transduction and VEGF<br />

secretion, both in vitro and in tumors grown in mice. Pre-treatment of tumor cells<br />

with sunitinib reduced <strong>the</strong> response to subsequent sunitinib and sorafenib but not to<br />

everolimus. Lack by sunitinib of a persistent inhibition of key proteins including<br />

HIF-1, VEGF and MAPK anticipates onset of resistance in xenografted tumors. After<br />

first line sunitinib, second line everolimus was more effective than sorafenib or<br />

sunitinib rechallenge to interfere with critical signalling proteins and VEGF and<br />

Interleukin-8 secretion, translating into an advantage in <strong>the</strong> long-lasting inhibition of<br />

tumor growth and significant prolongation of mice survival.<br />

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that angiogenic and signalling proteins predict<br />

treatment failure with sunitinib and that <strong>the</strong> use of mTOR inhibitor everolimus in<br />

second line is substantiated by a persistent control of proteins responsible for RCC<br />

growth and resistance to treatment.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

870 COMPLIANCE WITH SUNITINIB TREATMENT IN PATIENTS<br />

WITH RENAL CELL CANCER<br />

A. De Both 1 , V. Kruse 2 , E. De Coene 2 , N. Clottens 3 , A. Somers 3 , S. van Belle 2 ,<br />

L. van Bortel 4 , S. Rottey 2<br />

1 Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 2 Medical<br />

Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 3 Pharamcy, University<br />

Hospital Ghent, Ghent, BELGIUM, 4 Clinical Pharamcy, University Hospital Ghent,<br />

Ghent, BELGIUM<br />

Introduction: Sunitinib (SUN) is one of <strong>the</strong> standard treatment options for<br />

metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). There are several possible reasons for<br />

non-compliance to <strong>the</strong> prescribed doses: oral intake of <strong>the</strong> drug, side effects and <strong>the</strong><br />

existence of multiple dosage forms. Prescribers are not always aware of this<br />

non-compliance.<br />

Methods: In Belgium SUN can only be delivered by <strong>the</strong> hospital pharmacy. This<br />

allows calculation of <strong>the</strong> used versus <strong>the</strong> prescribed dose. Based on <strong>the</strong>se data, <strong>the</strong><br />

minimum number of non-compliant weeks per patient were calculated.<br />

Results: 34 incident patients were considered, treated in <strong>the</strong> Ghent University<br />

Hospital between 2007–<strong>2012</strong>. The total number of treatment weeks for this patient<br />

group was 1079 (ranging between 1 and 108 weeks). A total of 850 weeks were<br />

suitable for analysis. 14 out of <strong>the</strong>se 34 patients (41.2%) had at least one week in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir treatment period of non-compliance (insufficient number of pills), with <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage of time of treatment non-compliance in <strong>the</strong>se individual patients ranging<br />

from 2–40 % of <strong>the</strong> total treatment time, <strong>the</strong> average being 19 % of <strong>the</strong> weeks. The<br />

group with one or more weeks of non-compliance were <strong>the</strong> patients with <strong>the</strong> longest<br />

SUN intake: 47.2 versus 20.8 months of intake. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand 5/34 patients<br />

(14.7%) received considerably more pills from <strong>the</strong> pharmacy than <strong>the</strong>ir treatment<br />

regimen warranted.<br />

Conclusions: In our single-center database of patients treated by SUN for mRCC, we<br />

demonstrated that over 40% of <strong>the</strong> patients were possibly non-compliant with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

prescribed SUN dose. This occurred more frequently in long-term treatment. Given<br />

<strong>the</strong> average non-compliance time in this subgroup (19% of <strong>the</strong> weeks) we can<br />

conclude that this might significantly influence overall survival and response to<br />

treatment. We thus advocate a tighter patient follow-up and a control of drug<br />

prescription and delivery, which could result in detection of non-compliance more<br />

rapidly.<br />

Disclosure: S. Rottey: Advisory board Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, GSK Research grant<br />

Pfizer, Bayer. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

872 COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SUNITINIB VERSUS SORAFENIB<br />

AS THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH<br />

METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA<br />

S.J. Park1 , J. Lee2 , I. Park2 , K. Park2 , J. Ahn2 , D.H. Lee2 , C. Song3 , J.H. Hong3 ,<br />

C. Kim3 , H. Ahn3 1 2<br />

Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, KOREA, Department of Oncology,<br />

Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, KOREA,<br />

3<br />

Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of<br />

Medicine, Seoul, KOREA<br />

Background: Sunitinib has been recommended as <strong>the</strong> primary treatment in <strong>the</strong><br />

patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) among <strong>the</strong> vascular endo<strong>the</strong>lial<br />

growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI). However, <strong>the</strong>re are no published<br />

clinical data that compared directly <strong>the</strong> efficacy of targeted agents in <strong>the</strong> first line<br />

setting. This study investigated <strong>the</strong> efficacy and toxicity of sorafenib and sunitinib as<br />

primary treatment for patients with mRCC.<br />

Methods: To compare <strong>the</strong> efficacy and toxicities between sorafenib and sunitinb,<br />

clinical database was used to identify all patients with mRCC treated with VEGF<br />

TKIs in Asan Medical Center from April 2005 to March 2011. Among 304 patients,<br />

Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds399 | ix287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!