Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Characteristic No. %<br />
Total 63<br />
1 st Breast Cancer 53 84<br />
Median Age Range 42 24–73<br />
BRCA1 mutation 25 40<br />
BRCA2 mutation 27 42<br />
Stage<br />
I 14 27<br />
II 25 48<br />
III 4 8<br />
Unknown 9 17<br />
Histology<br />
Ductal 30 57<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 10 19<br />
Unknown 13 24<br />
2 nd Breast Cancer 15 28<br />
Median Age Range 48 36–71<br />
BRCA1 mutation 5 33<br />
BRCA2 mutation 8 53<br />
Stage<br />
Stage I 8 53<br />
Stage II 3 20<br />
Stage III 3 20<br />
Histology<br />
Ductal 12 80<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 2 13<br />
3 rd Breast Cancer 2 4<br />
Median Age Range 54 53–55<br />
BRCA2 mutation 2 100<br />
Stage<br />
I 1 50<br />
III 1 50<br />
Histology<br />
Ductal 2 100<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
1450P EFFECT OF PRIOR METFORMIN INTAKE ON FIRST<br />
DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER<br />
S. Gupta 1 , D. Avila 2 , E.A. Mino 2 , P. Gosain 2 , K.K. Batra 2 , S. McDunn 3<br />
1 Div of Hematology-Oncology, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County,<br />
Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2 Internal Medicine, John H Stroger<br />
Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,<br />
3 Hematology-Oncology, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago,<br />
IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />
Introduction: Metformin has been shown in pre clinical studies to have <strong>the</strong> ability to<br />
reduce tumor growth and exert anti cancer effects. It is being tested as a part of<br />
management of breast cancer (BC) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and being<br />
entertained as a modality of chemoprevention in BC. We studied <strong>the</strong> effect of prior<br />
metformin intake on patients with first diagnosis of breast cancer.<br />
Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of BC were identified from <strong>the</strong> Tumor<br />
Registry of our hospital, which serves <strong>the</strong> underserved population of Chicago, USA.<br />
All charts were retrospectively screened for age, tumor grade, node status at<br />
diagnosis, onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) prior to cancer diagnosis and intake of<br />
metformin including duration. Patients with a diagnosis of DM after cancer, intake<br />
of metformin less than 6 months or incomplete medical record were excluded.<br />
Difference in means was calculated using <strong>the</strong> student t-test.<br />
Results: A total of 1569 patients were screened of which 133 patients were identified<br />
to have a diagnosis of DM before breast cancer and met <strong>the</strong> inclusion criteria. Of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se, 95 patients were on metformin for an average 3.57 years (yrs) before BC<br />
diagnosis. Thirty-nine patients on metformin were younger than 60 yrs and 56 were<br />
older than 60 yrs age. Node positive disease was seen in 51.5% of metformin patients<br />
compared to 49% DM patients not on metformin (p = NS). However in patients<br />
younger than 60 yrs, node positive disease was seen in 66% of metformin patients<br />
compared to 86% non-metformin patients. The young patients on metformin had an<br />
average grade of 2.38 compared to non-metformin patients whose average grade was<br />
2.83 (p = 0.02). More patients in young non-metformin group were Her2-neu<br />
positive (43%) compared to 23% in young metformin group. In older patients more<br />
non-metformin patients had triple negative disease (20%) compared to 9% in<br />
metformin group.<br />
Annals of Oncology<br />
Conclusions: Prior metformin use may have a possible positive effect in patients<br />
with initial diagnosis of BC. This effect seems more pronounced in patients younger<br />
than 60 yrs of age where metformin intake was associated with a statistically<br />
significant reduction in tumor grade with a trend towards reduction in node positive<br />
disease and Her2 positivity. Fur<strong>the</strong>r studies are needed to clarify <strong>the</strong> potential<br />
protective role of metformin in this younger group.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
1451P FIVE-YEAR RESULTS OF THE BREAST CANCER SCREENING<br />
PROGRAMME IN UGRA<br />
N.A. Zakharova 1 , S.W. Duffy 2 , J. Mackay 3 , E.V. Kotlyarov 4 , A.V. Filimonov 5 ,<br />
K. Barinov 1 , I. Gromut 1 , E.V. Belan 1<br />
1 Oncological, State Oncology Center, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN<br />
FEDERATION, 2 Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University<br />
of London, London, UNITED KINGDOM, 3 Consultant Clinical Genetic<br />
Oncologist, University College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM, 4 Oncology,<br />
State Medical Academy, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 5 Chief,<br />
State Healthcare Department, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN FEDERATION<br />
The main purpose of this study is to estimate <strong>the</strong> five-year result of <strong>the</strong> Breast<br />
Cancer Screening Program (BCSP) performed in <strong>the</strong> Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous<br />
Okrug - Ugra. This Programme was initiated in 2007. The screening covers women<br />
over 40 years old. The screening interval is 2 years, with two-view mammography<br />
(MLO and CC) and single reading as <strong>the</strong> standard. During 2007–2011 within <strong>the</strong><br />
BCSP, 201668 women were screened (177475 - prevalence screening). The screening<br />
coverage rate is approximately 56.4%. In 2011 we also evaluated <strong>the</strong> efficacy of usage<br />
for <strong>the</strong> mammography equipment in each district. According to <strong>the</strong> standard (RF) –<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are 2840 examinations per day (2381 examinations per day - <strong>the</strong> average<br />
number in Ugra). Thus, <strong>the</strong> coverage rate only for <strong>the</strong> districts with <strong>the</strong> sufficient<br />
number of <strong>the</strong> examinations per day estimated as 68.4%. 10.3% of screened women<br />
were referred for fur<strong>the</strong>r assessment. There were 460 breast cancer cases detected at<br />
<strong>the</strong> first round of screening and 22 cases in subsequent rounds. The cancer detection<br />
rate for prevalence was 2.6 and for subsequent rounds 0.9 per 1000 screened women.<br />
The test sensitivity for <strong>the</strong> first round was estimated as 77%. Also, we have tentatively<br />
evaluated <strong>the</strong> likely future effect on mortality from <strong>the</strong> breast cancer as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
BCSP in Ugra, on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> changes in mortality seen at this early stage of <strong>the</strong><br />
programme and of <strong>the</strong> changes in size and node status of <strong>the</strong> cancers diagnosed. In<br />
2009–11, a reduction in breast cancer mortality of <strong>the</strong> order of 15–20% was<br />
observed, compared to previous years. We anticipate a 20% reduction in deaths from<br />
breast cancer by 2015, on <strong>the</strong> basis of this and of reductions in <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />
tumours of size >20 mm. The changes in <strong>the</strong> tumour size distribution do not appear<br />
to be due to length bias or overdiagnosis, since <strong>the</strong> overall incidence is consistent<br />
with pre-screening trends of increasing incidence. Analysis of node status is<br />
complicated by possible changes in practice with respect to axillary investigation. We<br />
are planning to increase <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong> digital mammography equipment in<br />
order to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> examination and <strong>the</strong>n - to implement <strong>the</strong> CAD<br />
(computer-aided detection) system. Thus, in <strong>the</strong> future in Ugra, it is planned to<br />
continue <strong>the</strong> BCSP, and to continue to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of screening.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
1452P CANCER SCREENING IN UNDERSERVED, VULNERABLE<br />
POPULATION. RESULTS FROM THE EDIFICE SURVEY<br />
F. Eisinger 1 , J. Viguier 2 , C. Touboul 3 , Y. Coscas 4 , X. Pivot 5 , J. Blay 6 , C. Lhomel 4 ,<br />
J. Morère 7<br />
1 Oncology, IPC INSERM UMR 599, Marseille, FRANCE, 2 Centre De<br />
Coordination Des Dépistages Des Cancers, CHRU Trousseau, Tours, FRANCE,<br />
3 Oncology, Kantar Health, Montrouge, FRANCE, 4 Oncology, Clinique de la Porte<br />
de Saint Cloud, Boulogne Billancourt, FRANCE, 5 Service Oncologie Medicale, C.<br />
H.U. Jean Minjoz, Besancon, FRANCE, 6 Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon,<br />
FRANCE, 7 Oncology, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, FRANCE<br />
Background: Reducing cancer inequalities is one of <strong>the</strong> most critical goals of <strong>the</strong><br />
current National Cancer Plan. The French health system allows fair access to care for<br />
all affected persons. In contrast, exposure to risk factors is far worse for underserved<br />
populations. The issue of cancer screening attendance distribution according to social<br />
factors, deserves to be assessed and regularly monitored.<br />
Methods: Accurate data on cancer screening in <strong>the</strong> population is available; however<br />
it is difficult to assess who belongs to an underserved/vulnerable subgroup. Many<br />
indicators could be used, such as <strong>the</strong> validated questionnaire “EPICES” with eleven<br />
yes/no questions.We analysed a sample of <strong>the</strong> general population (N = 1603) to<br />
ix470 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>