24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characteristic No. %<br />

Total 63<br />

1 st Breast Cancer 53 84<br />

Median Age Range 42 24–73<br />

BRCA1 mutation 25 40<br />

BRCA2 mutation 27 42<br />

Stage<br />

I 14 27<br />

II 25 48<br />

III 4 8<br />

Unknown 9 17<br />

Histology<br />

Ductal 30 57<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 10 19<br />

Unknown 13 24<br />

2 nd Breast Cancer 15 28<br />

Median Age Range 48 36–71<br />

BRCA1 mutation 5 33<br />

BRCA2 mutation 8 53<br />

Stage<br />

Stage I 8 53<br />

Stage II 3 20<br />

Stage III 3 20<br />

Histology<br />

Ductal 12 80<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 2 13<br />

3 rd Breast Cancer 2 4<br />

Median Age Range 54 53–55<br />

BRCA2 mutation 2 100<br />

Stage<br />

I 1 50<br />

III 1 50<br />

Histology<br />

Ductal 2 100<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1450P EFFECT OF PRIOR METFORMIN INTAKE ON FIRST<br />

DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER<br />

S. Gupta 1 , D. Avila 2 , E.A. Mino 2 , P. Gosain 2 , K.K. Batra 2 , S. McDunn 3<br />

1 Div of Hematology-Oncology, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County,<br />

Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2 Internal Medicine, John H Stroger<br />

Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,<br />

3 Hematology-Oncology, John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago,<br />

IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

Introduction: Metformin has been shown in pre clinical studies to have <strong>the</strong> ability to<br />

reduce tumor growth and exert anti cancer effects. It is being tested as a part of<br />

management of breast cancer (BC) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and being<br />

entertained as a modality of chemoprevention in BC. We studied <strong>the</strong> effect of prior<br />

metformin intake on patients with first diagnosis of breast cancer.<br />

Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of BC were identified from <strong>the</strong> Tumor<br />

Registry of our hospital, which serves <strong>the</strong> underserved population of Chicago, USA.<br />

All charts were retrospectively screened for age, tumor grade, node status at<br />

diagnosis, onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) prior to cancer diagnosis and intake of<br />

metformin including duration. Patients with a diagnosis of DM after cancer, intake<br />

of metformin less than 6 months or incomplete medical record were excluded.<br />

Difference in means was calculated using <strong>the</strong> student t-test.<br />

Results: A total of 1569 patients were screened of which 133 patients were identified<br />

to have a diagnosis of DM before breast cancer and met <strong>the</strong> inclusion criteria. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, 95 patients were on metformin for an average 3.57 years (yrs) before BC<br />

diagnosis. Thirty-nine patients on metformin were younger than 60 yrs and 56 were<br />

older than 60 yrs age. Node positive disease was seen in 51.5% of metformin patients<br />

compared to 49% DM patients not on metformin (p = NS). However in patients<br />

younger than 60 yrs, node positive disease was seen in 66% of metformin patients<br />

compared to 86% non-metformin patients. The young patients on metformin had an<br />

average grade of 2.38 compared to non-metformin patients whose average grade was<br />

2.83 (p = 0.02). More patients in young non-metformin group were Her2-neu<br />

positive (43%) compared to 23% in young metformin group. In older patients more<br />

non-metformin patients had triple negative disease (20%) compared to 9% in<br />

metformin group.<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

Conclusions: Prior metformin use may have a possible positive effect in patients<br />

with initial diagnosis of BC. This effect seems more pronounced in patients younger<br />

than 60 yrs of age where metformin intake was associated with a statistically<br />

significant reduction in tumor grade with a trend towards reduction in node positive<br />

disease and Her2 positivity. Fur<strong>the</strong>r studies are needed to clarify <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

protective role of metformin in this younger group.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1451P FIVE-YEAR RESULTS OF THE BREAST CANCER SCREENING<br />

PROGRAMME IN UGRA<br />

N.A. Zakharova 1 , S.W. Duffy 2 , J. Mackay 3 , E.V. Kotlyarov 4 , A.V. Filimonov 5 ,<br />

K. Barinov 1 , I. Gromut 1 , E.V. Belan 1<br />

1 Oncological, State Oncology Center, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN<br />

FEDERATION, 2 Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University<br />

of London, London, UNITED KINGDOM, 3 Consultant Clinical Genetic<br />

Oncologist, University College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM, 4 Oncology,<br />

State Medical Academy, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, 5 Chief,<br />

State Healthcare Department, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIAN FEDERATION<br />

The main purpose of this study is to estimate <strong>the</strong> five-year result of <strong>the</strong> Breast<br />

Cancer Screening Program (BCSP) performed in <strong>the</strong> Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous<br />

Okrug - Ugra. This Programme was initiated in 2007. The screening covers women<br />

over 40 years old. The screening interval is 2 years, with two-view mammography<br />

(MLO and CC) and single reading as <strong>the</strong> standard. During 2007–2011 within <strong>the</strong><br />

BCSP, 201668 women were screened (177475 - prevalence screening). The screening<br />

coverage rate is approximately 56.4%. In 2011 we also evaluated <strong>the</strong> efficacy of usage<br />

for <strong>the</strong> mammography equipment in each district. According to <strong>the</strong> standard (RF) –<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are 2840 examinations per day (2381 examinations per day - <strong>the</strong> average<br />

number in Ugra). Thus, <strong>the</strong> coverage rate only for <strong>the</strong> districts with <strong>the</strong> sufficient<br />

number of <strong>the</strong> examinations per day estimated as 68.4%. 10.3% of screened women<br />

were referred for fur<strong>the</strong>r assessment. There were 460 breast cancer cases detected at<br />

<strong>the</strong> first round of screening and 22 cases in subsequent rounds. The cancer detection<br />

rate for prevalence was 2.6 and for subsequent rounds 0.9 per 1000 screened women.<br />

The test sensitivity for <strong>the</strong> first round was estimated as 77%. Also, we have tentatively<br />

evaluated <strong>the</strong> likely future effect on mortality from <strong>the</strong> breast cancer as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

BCSP in Ugra, on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> changes in mortality seen at this early stage of <strong>the</strong><br />

programme and of <strong>the</strong> changes in size and node status of <strong>the</strong> cancers diagnosed. In<br />

2009–11, a reduction in breast cancer mortality of <strong>the</strong> order of 15–20% was<br />

observed, compared to previous years. We anticipate a 20% reduction in deaths from<br />

breast cancer by 2015, on <strong>the</strong> basis of this and of reductions in <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />

tumours of size >20 mm. The changes in <strong>the</strong> tumour size distribution do not appear<br />

to be due to length bias or overdiagnosis, since <strong>the</strong> overall incidence is consistent<br />

with pre-screening trends of increasing incidence. Analysis of node status is<br />

complicated by possible changes in practice with respect to axillary investigation. We<br />

are planning to increase <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong> digital mammography equipment in<br />

order to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> examination and <strong>the</strong>n - to implement <strong>the</strong> CAD<br />

(computer-aided detection) system. Thus, in <strong>the</strong> future in Ugra, it is planned to<br />

continue <strong>the</strong> BCSP, and to continue to improve <strong>the</strong> quality of screening.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

1452P CANCER SCREENING IN UNDERSERVED, VULNERABLE<br />

POPULATION. RESULTS FROM THE EDIFICE SURVEY<br />

F. Eisinger 1 , J. Viguier 2 , C. Touboul 3 , Y. Coscas 4 , X. Pivot 5 , J. Blay 6 , C. Lhomel 4 ,<br />

J. Morère 7<br />

1 Oncology, IPC INSERM UMR 599, Marseille, FRANCE, 2 Centre De<br />

Coordination Des Dépistages Des Cancers, CHRU Trousseau, Tours, FRANCE,<br />

3 Oncology, Kantar Health, Montrouge, FRANCE, 4 Oncology, Clinique de la Porte<br />

de Saint Cloud, Boulogne Billancourt, FRANCE, 5 Service Oncologie Medicale, C.<br />

H.U. Jean Minjoz, Besancon, FRANCE, 6 Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon,<br />

FRANCE, 7 Oncology, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, FRANCE<br />

Background: Reducing cancer inequalities is one of <strong>the</strong> most critical goals of <strong>the</strong><br />

current National Cancer Plan. The French health system allows fair access to care for<br />

all affected persons. In contrast, exposure to risk factors is far worse for underserved<br />

populations. The issue of cancer screening attendance distribution according to social<br />

factors, deserves to be assessed and regularly monitored.<br />

Methods: Accurate data on cancer screening in <strong>the</strong> population is available; however<br />

it is difficult to assess who belongs to an underserved/vulnerable subgroup. Many<br />

indicators could be used, such as <strong>the</strong> validated questionnaire “EPICES” with eleven<br />

yes/no questions.We analysed a sample of <strong>the</strong> general population (N = 1603) to<br />

ix470 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!