24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

experienced significantly more ≥ grade 2 neurotoxicity (51.2% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.001)<br />

(Table-1). Neurotropin was <strong>the</strong> only factor that affected <strong>the</strong> incidence of ≥ grade 2<br />

neurotoxicity in <strong>the</strong> Kaplan-Meier log rank and <strong>the</strong> multivariate Cox proportional<br />

hazards regression analysis.<br />

Conclusion: Neurotropin combined with oxaliplatin decreases chronic neurotoxicity<br />

effectively and safely.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

557P A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CETUXIMAB PLUS<br />

CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH KRAS WILD-TYPE<br />

UNRESECTABLE COLORECTAL LIVER-LIMITED METASTASES<br />

J. Xu, L. Ye, L. Ren, Y. Wei<br />

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University,<br />

Shanghai, CHINA<br />

Background: To assess <strong>the</strong> effect of cetuximab combined with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy in<br />

first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM).<br />

Methods: After resection of <strong>the</strong> primary focus, patients (pts) with non-resectable<br />

synchronous liver-limited metastases from wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer were<br />

randomly assigned to received chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6) plus<br />

cetuximab (arm A) or chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy alone (arm B). The primary end point was <strong>the</strong><br />

rate of secondary resection for liver metastases. Secondary end points included tumor<br />

response and survival.<br />

Results: From June 2008 to December 2011, 116 pts were eligible (59 in arm A and<br />

57 in arm B). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and median survival time (MST)<br />

of <strong>the</strong> total pts was 32% and 27.5 months (mo), respectively. R0 resection rate for<br />

liver metastases was 30.5% (18/59) in arm A and 8.8% (5/57) in arm B, with<br />

significant difference (Odds ratio = 4.57, p< .01). In R0 resected 18 pts from arm A,<br />

<strong>the</strong> median disease free survival and MST was 11.4 and 46.6 mo. The pts in arm A<br />

had improved objective response (OR, 66.1% v 33.3%, Odds ratio = 3.90, p< .01),<br />

increased 3-year OS rate (43% v 21%, p= .01) and prolonged MST (32.8 v 22.8 mo,<br />

HR =0.49, p= .01) compared with those in arm B. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, for <strong>the</strong> pts without<br />

liver surgery, people from arm A also got more survival benefit than those from arm<br />

B on 3-year OS rate (25% v 17%, p= .047), MST (28.2 v 21.2 mo, HR =0.55, p= .047)<br />

and progressives free survival (8.3 v 5.2 mo, HR =0.64, p= .03). In addition, in arm<br />

A, pts who experienced resection of liver metastases were significantly improved<br />

3-year OS rate (74% v 25%, p= .02) and MST (46.6 v 28.2 mo, HR = 0.29, p= .02)<br />

than those without liver surgery, and <strong>the</strong> pts harboring BRAF wild-type tumors<br />

gained more benefit on MST (35.8 v 23.4 mo, HR =0.39, p= .045) ra<strong>the</strong>r than on OR<br />

( 70.0% v 44.4%, Odds ratio = 2.92, p > .05), when compared to those with mutated<br />

BRAF tumors.<br />

Conclusion: For initially unresectable CLM population with KRAS wild-type,<br />

cetuximab combined with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy could improve resectability of liver<br />

metastases, response rates and survival compared with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy alone<br />

(ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01564810).<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

558P UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE OF RESPONSE AND EARLY<br />

TUMOUR SHRINKAGE (ETS) IN PTS WITH WT KRAS MCRC<br />

TREATED WITH PANITUMUMAB (P) PLUS FOLFOX (F)<br />

J. Douillard 1 , S. Siena 2 , J. Tabernero 3 , M. Peeters 4 , C. Davison 5 , S. Braun 6 ,<br />

R. Sidhu 7<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau (ICO) Institut de Cancerologie de<br />

l’Ouest, Nantes, FRANCE, 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale<br />

Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, ITALY, 3 Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron<br />

University HospitalMedical Oncology Service, Barcelona, SPAIN, 4 Department Of<br />

Medical Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, BELGIUM,<br />

5 Biostatistics, Amgen Ltd., Uxbridge, UNITED KINGDOM, 6 Medical<br />

Development, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, SWITZERLAND, 7 Medical<br />

Development, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

Introduction: In clinical trials, tumour response is considered clinically<br />

meaningful when a lesion shrinks by ≥30%, according to RECIST (ORR). It<br />

has been purported that in pts with WT KRAS mCRC treated with an<br />

anti-EGFR mAb, both ORR and ETS (week 8 [W8]; ≥20%) predict improved<br />

OS compared with standard treatment. We explore <strong>the</strong> validity of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>ses.<br />

Methods: Using final analysis data from PRIME, we calculated median OS and PFS<br />

in pts with WT KRAS mCRC who did or did not achieve: a RECIST response (≥/<<br />

30%); or ETS (≥/ < 20%) at W8. We calculated <strong>the</strong> binary correlation coefficients<br />

(Phi) for <strong>the</strong> association between meeting <strong>the</strong> above shrinkage criteria at W8 (yes/<br />

no) and OS at 2 years.<br />

Results: Consistent with <strong>the</strong> previously published finding that ORR is higher with P<br />

+ F vs F, at W8 more pts treated with P + F (vs F) had a RECIST response (Table).<br />

Irrespective of treatment arm, median OS and PFS were significantly longer in pts<br />

who achieved ei<strong>the</strong>r ETS or a RECIST response (vs pts who did not; Table). Pts<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

receiving P + F (vs F) showed longer median OS and PFS in each shrinkage group.<br />

OS trends favoured <strong>the</strong> P arm for pts achieving ETS (vs F alone; Table). However,<br />

outcomes were similar between arms in pts that achieved a RECIST response at W8.<br />

The correlation coefficients between meeting <strong>the</strong> ≥30% or ≥20% criterion and OS at<br />

2 years were 0.21 and 0.27, respectively.<br />

Conclusions: Regardless of treatment arm, pts achieving a RECIST response<br />

(≥30%) or ETS (≥20%) at W8 demonstrated improved PFS and OS compared<br />

with those who did not. Trends toward longer OS were observed in pts treated<br />

with P + F achieving ETS compared with F alone. Potential imbalances in<br />

post-protocol anti-EGFR mAb use and resection rate limit <strong>the</strong> interpretation of<br />

ORR in predicting OS. The poor Phi values found in PRIME between W8<br />

tumour shrinkage and 2-year OS suggest that ORR and ETS alone in <strong>the</strong><br />

first-line treatment of mCRC are inappropriate surrogates for predicting OS.<br />

FOLFOX Panitumumab + FOLFOX<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!