24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

692P PRELIMINARY SAFETY DATA FROM A RANDOMIZED PHASE<br />

II STUDY COMPARING DOSE-ESCALATED WEEKLY<br />

PACLITAXEL VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE WEEKLY<br />

PACLITAXEL FOR PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY TREATED<br />

ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER<br />

S. Yuki1 , K. Shitara2 , D. Takahari2 , M. Nakamura3 , C. Kondo2 , T. Tsuda4 ,T.Kii5 ,<br />

Y. Tsuji6 , I. Oze7 , K. Muro2 1<br />

Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo,<br />

JAPAN, 2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital,<br />

Nagoya, JAPAN, 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General<br />

Hospital, Sapporo, JAPAN, 4 Department of Clinical Oncology, Saint Marianna<br />

University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, JAPAN, 5 Cancer Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

Center, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, JAPAN, 6 Department of Medical<br />

Oncology, KKR sapporo medical center Tonan hospital, Sapporo, JAPAN,<br />

7<br />

Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research<br />

Institute, Nagoya, JAPAN<br />

Background: Recently, we studied <strong>the</strong> effects of neutropenia occurring during<br />

second-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy with weekly paclitaxel in a retrospective analysis of 242<br />

patients with advanced gastric cancer, and observed better survival among patients<br />

with neutropenia compared to patients without neutropenia (Shitara K, et al. Annals<br />

of Oncol. 2011). Therefore, we conducted a multi-institutional, open-label,<br />

randomized phase II trial comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel with dose<br />

adjustments determined by degree of neutropenia versus standard-dose weekly<br />

paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (protocol ID<br />

UMIN000004055).<br />

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer that<br />

progressed during one or more previous chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy regimens were included.<br />

Ninety patients were randomized to a standard dose of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ,<br />

Arm A) or an escalated dose of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 on day 1, 100 mg/m 2 on<br />

day 8, and 120 mg/m 2 on day 15 unless severe toxicity is observed, Arm B). The<br />

primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included objective<br />

response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and adverse events. We<br />

present <strong>the</strong> preliminary safety data from <strong>the</strong> first 8 weeks.<br />

Results: From September 2010 to November 2011, a total of 90 patients were<br />

enrolled at 13 institutions. One patient in Arm B did not receive paclitaxel. The dose<br />

of paclitaxel was escalated to 100 mg/m 2 in 41 patients (91.1%) and <strong>the</strong>n to 120 mg/<br />

m 2 in 29 patients (64.4%) in Arm B. In <strong>the</strong> first 8 weeks, 25 (55.5%) patients in Arm<br />

A patients and 20 (46.7%) patients in Arm B required dose reduction or treatment<br />

delay. Frequencies of grade 1 or more neutropenia were 66.7% in Arm A and 86.4%<br />

in Arm B, and grade 3 or more neutropenia frequencies were 31.1% in Arm A and<br />

38.6% in Arm B. Grade 1 or more sensory neuropathy frequencies were 55.6% in<br />

Arm A and 68.1% in Arm B. Two patients in Arm A and one patient in Arm B<br />

experienced febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred.<br />

Conclusions: Preliminary safety data during <strong>the</strong> first 8 weeks of treatment indicate<br />

comparable compliance between <strong>the</strong> two arms, despite <strong>the</strong> substantial number of<br />

patients who underwent dose escalation.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

693P EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DOSE-DENSE CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

WITH MODIFIED TCF REGIMEN (TCF-DD) IN ELDERLY<br />

PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER (MGC)<br />

G. Tomasello, W. Liguigli, S. Lazzarelli, R. Poli, F.M. Negri, L. Toppo, M. Ratti,<br />

M. Brighenti, F. Gerevini, R. Passalacqua<br />

Oncology Division, Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, ITALY<br />

Background: GC is more common in elderly patients (pts). Most oncologists are<br />

reluctant to treat this pts population with <strong>the</strong> most active poli-chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

combinations because of safety concerns. Subgroup analysis of elderly pts enrolled in<br />

European studies show limited and conflicting data. We previously reported on <strong>the</strong><br />

feasibility and high activity of a dose-dense TCF regimen (TCF-dd) (Tomasello<br />

2010). This study aims to evaluate <strong>the</strong> efficacy and safety of this schema in <strong>the</strong><br />

elderly pts subgroup (≥ 65 years).<br />

Methods: From 11/04 to 05/12, 111 consecutive pts with MGC (median age 65,<br />

range 31-81) were enrolled in a single-centre phase II study. Pts received Docetaxel<br />

70 mg/m 2 d1, CDDP 60 mg/m 2 d1, l-AF 100 mg/m 2 d1-2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/<br />

m 2 bolus d1-2, and <strong>the</strong>n 600 mg/m 2 as a 22h c.i. d1-2, q2w, plus G-CSF d3. Pts ≥<br />

65y (56) received <strong>the</strong> same schedule reduced by 30%.<br />

Results: 96 pts evaluable for response and all for toxicity. In pts ≥ 65y we observed 4<br />

CR (7%) 25 PR (45%) 10 SD (18%) 7 PD (13%); in younger pts: 2 CR (4%) 30 PR<br />

(55%) 9 SD (16%) 9 PD (17%); ORR by ITT 56% (95% IC 45-64). Median OS was<br />

11.9 months (9,4-14,8); in elderly and younger pts 11,2 (8,4-11,1) and 12,7 (9-16,5)<br />

respectively. Out of 48 evaluable pts ≥ 65y, 26 (54%) were treated at full doses<br />

without any delay. In <strong>the</strong> elderly most frequent G3-4 toxicities were neutropenia<br />

(14%) thrombocytopenia (15%) febrile neutropenia (7%) as<strong>the</strong>nia (27%) and<br />

hypokalemia (17%); in <strong>the</strong> younger: neutropenia (56%) thrombocytopenia (21%)<br />

febrile neutropenia (16%) as<strong>the</strong>nia (43%) hypokalemia (21%).<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

Conclusions: This study shows that elderly pts can be treated with a TCF-dd<br />

regimen reduced by 30% achieving similar efficacy results of younger patients with<br />

lesser toxicity.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

694P PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND POSTPROGRESSION<br />

SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER<br />

TREATED WITH FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

K. Shitara 1 , K. Matsuo 2 , K. Muro 3 , A. Ohtsu 1<br />

1 Gastroenterology & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital<br />

East, Kashiwa, JAPAN, 2 Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Aichi Cancer<br />

Center, Nagoya, JAPAN, 3 Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital,<br />

Nagoya, JAPAN<br />

Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) has been reported to be moderately<br />

correlated to overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who<br />

received first-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (Shitara, K et al. Invest New Drug 2011; Shitara K<br />

and Burzykowski T. On behalf of GASTRIC. ASCO 2011). Impact of post progression<br />

survival (PPS) on OS of patients with AGC has not yet been reported in detail.<br />

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed AGC patients who received first-line<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy including fluoropyrimidine plus platinum with confirmed disease<br />

progression. We partitioned OS into PFS and PPS and analyzed <strong>the</strong> correlation<br />

between OS and ei<strong>the</strong>r PFS or PPS by Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r).<br />

Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment setting (clinical trial or<br />

practice) and presence of measurable lesion. Multivariate analysis was also conducted<br />

to evaluate prognostic factors for PPS.<br />

Results: Between April 2005 to May 2011, 291 AGC patients met inclusion criteria.<br />

One-hundred five patients (36%) included in clinical trials and 246 patients (85%)<br />

received second-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy. Median PFS, PPS, and OS were 5.3 months, 8.1<br />

months. 14.8 months, respectively. PFS and OS showed a correlation with r of 0.75 (95%<br />

CI, 0.69- 0.81). PPS and OS also showed a correlation with r of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84- 0.91).<br />

Correlations tend to be higher between PSS and OS than that of PFS and OS in subset of<br />

patients in clinical trials (r = 0.84 vs. r = 0.72) or patients with measurable lesion (r = 0.87<br />

vs. r = 0.72). According to <strong>the</strong> multivariate analysis, performance status at progression and<br />

second-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy were significantly associated with length of PPS.<br />

Conclusion: Our results indicate that both PFS and PSS is correlated with OS in<br />

first-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for advanced AGC, thus suggest <strong>the</strong> importance of reporting<br />

detailed patients characteristic and treatment course after disease progression in<br />

clinical trials of first-line chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for AGC.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

695P QUALITY OF LIFE IN FLAGS TRIAL A RANDOMIZED,<br />

COMPARATIVE, OPEN LABEL, MULTICENTER, PHASE 3 OF<br />

S-1 + CISPLATIN (CS) COMPARED TO 5-FU + CISPLATIN (CF)<br />

IN UNTREATED ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER (AGC)<br />

PATIENTS<br />

G. Bodoky 1 , A. Carrato 2 , A. Ravaioli 3 , J.A. Ajani 4<br />

1 Dept of Medical Oncology, Szent Laszlo Korhaz, Budapest, HUNGARY,<br />

2 Medical Oncology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, SPAIN, 3 Primario<br />

Oncologia Medica, Ospedale “Infermi” di Rimini, Rimini, ITALY, 4 Gastrointestinal<br />

Medical Oncology, MD Anderson, Cancer center, Houston, TX, UNITED STATES<br />

OF AMERICA<br />

Background: FLAGS’ primary objective was overall survival. We report below <strong>the</strong><br />

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) (i.e., Quality-of-Life [QoL]) which was one of <strong>the</strong><br />

secondary objectives.<br />

Methods: All patients who completed at least one PRO assessment were eligible for<br />

analysis. The primary PRO endpoint was <strong>the</strong> Trial Outcome Index (TOI) of <strong>the</strong><br />

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Gastric (FACT-Ga). Patients completed<br />

<strong>the</strong> FACT-Ga at <strong>the</strong> beginning of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and <strong>the</strong>n every 3 cycles prior to<br />

treatment administration. All individual subscales in <strong>the</strong> FACT-Ga were also<br />

evaluated as secondary endpoints. The Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy Convenience and Satisfaction<br />

Questionnaire (CCSQ) was administered at <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> first 4 cycles.<br />

Results: Of <strong>the</strong> 508 patients dosed at cycle 1 in <strong>the</strong> CF arm, and <strong>the</strong> 521 in <strong>the</strong> CS<br />

arm, 456 and 498 respectively completed at least one question on <strong>the</strong> FACT-Ga and<br />

445 and 486 respectively completed at least 37 items. Compliance to questionnaire<br />

fulfillment was more than 80% through Cycle 9. Although <strong>the</strong>re were no overall<br />

difference in FACT-Ga scores between <strong>the</strong> treatment arms and minimal changes over<br />

time, an advantage for CS relative to CF was observed for Physical Well-Being<br />

(PWB) (51.7% versus 45.1%, p = 0.044). CS treated patients experienced significantly<br />

longer time to worsening in PWB scores, with a median time of 4.5 months (95%<br />

CI: 3.0 – 5.1) compared to 3.0 months (2.8 – 4.6) with CF (p = 0.014).Patients<br />

receiving CS reported higher best and worst score of PWB, Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

Convenience and Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy Concerns scores.<br />

Conclusions: Even if <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence to indicate any difference in FACT-Ga<br />

scores, some advantage to CS relative to CF was observed for PWB, one of <strong>the</strong><br />

ix232 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!