24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table: 857P<br />

standard, but is not available in all centres. 24h urine collection may be prone to<br />

sampling errors. Estimating GFR by <strong>the</strong> Cockroft-Gault formula (CG) is popular<br />

amongst oncologists but data supporting its use in this situation is limited. Reduction<br />

of C dose by 10% in <strong>the</strong> adjuvant treatment of seminoma stage I is associated with a<br />

trend for higher relapse rate.<br />

Methods: Data from 202 consecutive, male patients (median age 39, range 23-68<br />

years) with stage I seminoma with complete documentation of GFR by TC99m<br />

DTPA, serum-creatinine, age, height and weight were evaluated. Actual C doses<br />

(ACD) based on GFR measurement by TC99m DTPA were compared with estimated<br />

C doses (ECD) based on GFR estimation using CG formula. Differences between <strong>the</strong><br />

ACD and ECD were correlated to age and body mass index (BMI) using Fisher’s<br />

Exact test, Pearson correlation and linear regression.<br />

858P ADDITION OF DARBEPOETIN ALFA TO SEQUENTIAL HIGH<br />

DOSE VIP CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED<br />

METASTATIC GERM CELL CANCER<br />

J.T. Hartmann 1 , B. Metzner 2 , C. Binder 3 , H. Mergenthaler 4 , O. Rick 5 ,<br />

H.G. Sayer 6 , A. Lorch 7 , W.E. Berdel 8 , C. Bokemeyer 9 , T.C. Gauler 10<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, GERMANY,<br />

2 Abt. Onkologie/haematologie, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, GERMANY,<br />

3 Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen,<br />

GERMANY, 4 Klinik F. Onkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart - KatharinenhospitalKlinik<br />

f. Onkologie, Stuttgart, GERMANY, 5 Oncology, Klinik Reinhardshoehe, Bad<br />

Wildungen, GERMANY, 6 Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena,<br />

Jena, GERMANY, 7 Urologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf,<br />

Düsseldorf, GERMANY, 8 Medizinische Klinik A, Universitaetsklinikum Münster,<br />

Münster, GERMANY, 9 Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow<br />

Transplantation, UKE II. Medizinische Klinik und PoliklinikMedizinische Klinik II.,<br />

Hamburg-Eppendorf, GERMANY, 10 Oncology, University Hospital, Essen,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Background: High-dose VIP chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy (HD-VIP) plus ABSCT given as first line<br />

treatment might be a strategy in patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT)<br />

with poor prognosis. The objective of <strong>the</strong> trial was to investigate <strong>the</strong> addition of<br />

darbepoetin alfa to HD-VIP in order to reduce anemia/red blood cell (RBC)<br />

transfusions.<br />

Methods: This was a randomized, open-label multicenter phase 2 study conducted in<br />

20 hospitals. Darbepoetin 2,25 mcg/kg weekly or 500 mcg Q3W s.c., started with<br />

HD-VIP (dose level 6), was applied in arm B (arm A: HD-VIP alone). The primary<br />

objective was freedom from blood transfusions (FFT). Secondary objectives included<br />

objective remission rate (ORR) after chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy, 24-mos PFS and OS, median<br />

course of hemoglobin (Hb) levels during 3 HD-VIP cycles as well as drug safety.<br />

Results: Between 7/2003 and 11/2008 108 pts were allocated to <strong>the</strong> study, and 102<br />

were included in <strong>the</strong> intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. By March <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>the</strong> median<br />

follow-up time after randomization was 62 (range, 3–100) mos for surviving patients.<br />

Localisation of primary was gonadal in 66%, retroperitoneal in 19% and mediastinal<br />

in 14%s. A favourable treatment outcome (CR/NED/PR m-) in conjunction with<br />

secondary surgery (n = 76 pts) was achieved in 58% of pts with no difference between<br />

arms A and B. Overall FFT occurred in 2 pts (4.2%) in arm A and 3 pts (5.6%) in<br />

arm B, and in 23%/15%/15% and 15%/17%/19% of pts during cycles 1-3,<br />

respectively. No differences in baseline Hb, severity of anemia, number of RBC<br />

transfusions and area under <strong>the</strong> curve of Hb levels during HD-VIP was observed. Pts<br />

assigned to darbepoetin had similar treatment toxicity compared to those assigned to<br />

HD-VIP alone. 5-year OS in arm A was 74.0% compared to 63.0% (P = .18) in Arm<br />

B. 5-year DFS was 60.5% in arm A vs 53.1% in Arm B (P = 0.54). Darbepoetin was<br />

generally well tolerated with 2 pts discontinuing treatment due to thrombosis. A<br />

per-protocol (PP) analysis revealed comparable outcomes (OS 74.4 vs 67.5, P = 0.38;<br />

DFS 60.4 vs 58.3, P = 0.70).<br />

Conclusions: Based on ITT and PP analysis, <strong>the</strong> addition of darbepoetin alfa to<br />

HD-VIP compared to HD-VIP alone does not appear to impact FFT, ORR, and<br />

survival in poor prognosis GCT pts (NCT00204633).<br />

Results: 202 patients were included in <strong>the</strong> correlation analysis and 181 patients in<br />

<strong>the</strong> comparison of different subgroups, respectively. Lower BMI and higher age were<br />

significantly associated with lower ECD, Pearson correlation coefficients 0.59 (p <<br />

0.001) and –0.36 (p < 0.001), respectively. Tables show potential under- and<br />

overdosing of C when using CG (ECD expressed as percentage of ACD) in different<br />

age groups (Exact test p = 0.001) and groups with different BMI (Exact test p = 0.026)<br />

Discussion: CG significantly underestimates GFR in leaner and older patients.<br />

According to our data over a third of patients with BMI 20–25 or aged 41–50 would<br />

be at risk for undertreatment if CG were used routinely. Physicans need to be aware<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se limitations when using CG to calculate C dose in patients with stage I<br />

seminoma.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

859P MANAGEMENT OF POST ORCHIDECTOMY STAGE I<br />

CLASSICAL SEMINOMA: 11 YEAR OUTCOME DATA<br />

OF A UK REGIONAL CANCER UNIT<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

Age (years) 110% ACD BMI (kg/m 2 ) 110% ACD<br />

21-30 n = 29 14% 4 72% 21 14% 4 20-25 n = 60 35% 21 57% 34 8% 5<br />

31-40 n = 84 14% 12 68% 57 18% 15 25-30 n = 81 21% 17 69% 56 10% 8<br />

41-50 n = 68 40% 27 56% 38 4% 3 30-40 n = 33 15% 5 58% 19 27% 9<br />

A.J. McPartlin 1 ,R.Roy 1 , D. Muskett 2 , M. Witkowski 3 , A.J. Birtle 1<br />

1 Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UNITED KINGDOM,<br />

2 Histopathology, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, blackburn, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM, 3 Pathology, Morcombe bay Hospital Trust, Morcombe Bay,<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Introduction: Stage I classical seminoma has a 95% 5yr OS. Post-orchidectomy<br />

treatment options include para-aortic radio<strong>the</strong>rapy, single agent carboplatin or active<br />

surveillance. This retrospective study reviewed changing practice and outcomes over a<br />

11 year period in a regional cancer unit.<br />

Patients and methods: 188 consecutive patients seen from January 2000 to<br />

December 2010 were identified. Initial risk factors, treatment received and post<br />

treatment response were recorded and relapse free and overall survival calculated<br />

Results: Adjuvant radio<strong>the</strong>rapy was given to 106 patients (56.4%), adjuvant<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy to 56 (29.8%) and active surveillance to 26 (13.8%). Five year RFS by<br />

group was 97.2%, 89.9% and 76.9%. Fifteen patients relapsed with one dying despite<br />

third line treatment. Overall CSS was 99.4%. In <strong>the</strong> period before 2005 tumour size<br />

and rete testis invasion was documented in 9% of patients and active surveillance<br />

offered to none. After this time <strong>the</strong> two risk factors were documented in 82% and<br />

surveillance offered to 19.5%. Management and outcome stratified by presence of risk<br />

factor.<br />

Management<br />

Adjuvant<br />

Adjuvant Relapse<br />

Risk factor Surveillance Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy XRT rate<br />

None<br />

(51 patients)<br />

47.1% 25.6% 27.4% 7.5%<br />

One (24) 22.0% 42.0% 36.0% 14.0%<br />

Two (12) 0% 58.3% 41.7% 12.5%<br />

Conclusion: This review’s outcomes broadly correspond with published data<br />

although with increased incidence of relapse following standard adjuvant<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy- presumably an artifact of small numbers. Adjuvant treatment<br />

increases 5yr RFS compared to active surveillance but excellent CSS is achieved after<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r. The vast majority of radio<strong>the</strong>rapy (85%)was offered in <strong>the</strong> first two thirds of<br />

<strong>the</strong> study period and reflects older practice. The absence of risk factors appears to<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> rate of relapse and should guide treatment decisions. The increasing<br />

awareness of <strong>the</strong> importance of assessing risk factors when deciding on treatment is<br />

reflected in <strong>the</strong>ir improved identification in later patients and <strong>the</strong> increasing use of a<br />

surveillance strategy in those at lower risk of relapse.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

ix284 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!