Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annals of Oncology<br />
Results: SA #1 (Table) showed significant improvement in PFS with<br />
aflibercept-FOLFIRI compared to placebo-FOLFIRI (P < 0.00001), thus confirming<br />
primary PFS analysis. SA #2 also showed an improvement in PFS with aflibercept vs<br />
placebo; difference was not significant (P = 0.0017) at <strong>the</strong> 0.0001 α level.<br />
Discrepancies between IRC and investigators’ assessments were noted in placebo (n<br />
= 273, 45.8%) and aflibercept (n = 231, 39.3%) arms. An unstratified log-rank test<br />
comparing primary PFS in <strong>the</strong> two arms was consistent with <strong>the</strong> stratified analysis,<br />
showing a significant difference in PFS with aflibercept (P = 0.00005). Aflibercept<br />
showed typical anti-VEGF side effects.<br />
Conclusion: The data from <strong>the</strong>se PFS sensitivity analyses (SAs) are consistent with<br />
<strong>the</strong> primary analysis of PFS in VELOUR, fur<strong>the</strong>r supporting <strong>the</strong> statistically<br />
significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS seen in <strong>the</strong> primary<br />
analysis. Funded by Sanofi & Regeneron<br />
Analysis: PFS<br />
(months) Placebo N = 614 Aflibercept N = 612 HR [99.99% CI]<br />
Primary: 4.67 4.07 – 5.55 6.90 5.88 – 7.85 0.758 [0.578 – 0.995]<br />
SA #1: 4.53 4.07 – 5.68 6.97 6.05 – 8.51 0.654 [0.477 – 0.895]<br />
SA #2: 4.50 4.04 – 5.55 6.24 5.49 – 7.19 0.814 [0.630 – 1.052]<br />
Disclosure: E. Van Cutsem: I have received research funding from Sanofi.<br />
J. Tabernero: I have an advisory relationship with sanofi, for which I have been<br />
compensated. R. Lakomy: I have received research funding from Sanofi. P. Ruff: I<br />
have received honorarium from Amgen, Merck AG, Roche, Sanofi and Pfizer. I have<br />
received research funding from Amgen, Merck AG, Sanofi and Pfizer. I have received<br />
travel grants from Amgen, Roche, and Pfizer. D. Ferry: I have an advisory<br />
relationship with Sanofi. I have received honorarium from Sanofi. E. Boelle: I am an<br />
employee of Sanofi. C. Allegra: I have an advisory relationship with Sanofi. All o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
582P A PHASE II STUDY OF COMBINED CETUXIMAB, IRINOTECAN,<br />
OXALIPLATIN AND UFT (ESCOUT) IN PATIENTS WITH<br />
ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER (ACRC) INCORPORATING<br />
ANALYSIS OF CIRCULATING TUMOUR CELLS (CTCS)<br />
M. Krebs 1 , S. Gollins 2 , I. Chau 3 , J. Hasan 4 , M. Braun 4 , K. Morris 1 , J. Beech 4 ,<br />
G. Adaway 4 , C. Dive 1 , M.P. Saunders 4<br />
1 Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer<br />
Research, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM, 2 Clinical Oncology, North Wales<br />
Cancer Treatment Centre, Wales, UNITED KINGDOM, 3 Medicine, Royal Marsden<br />
Hospital, Sutton, UNITED KINGDOM, 4 Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS<br />
Foundation Trust, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
Introduction: Patients (pts) with ≥3 CTCs/7.5ml blood at baseline, enumerated by<br />
<strong>the</strong> CellSearch® (Veridex) system, have poor overall survival (OS)1. CTC guided<br />
treatment strategies may improve pt outcomes. This study investigated <strong>the</strong> efficacy of<br />
combining 4 active agents and evaluated CTC numbers for prognostic and<br />
pharmacodynamic utility.<br />
Methods: Pts with previously untreated, inoperable, ACRC and wtKRAS were<br />
eligible. Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy was administered every 28 days with Cetuximab 400 mg/m 2<br />
D1 & D15 and UFT 250 mg/m 2 with calcium folinate 30mg TDS D1-21. UFT dose<br />
was reduced by 1 caps/day for grade 2/3 diarrhoea. Irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 D1 and<br />
oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 D15 alternated to reduce long-term toxicity of each drug.<br />
Treatment was continued until disease progression. The primary end-point was<br />
response rate (RR) and secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS),<br />
OS, toxicity and CTC number. Blood samples (7.5ml) for CTC analysis were drawn<br />
at baseline and D15. CTCs were enumerated using <strong>the</strong> CellSearch® system. Results:<br />
Forty-eight pts were recruited; 46 were evaluable for response and 42 for CTC<br />
enumeration. A 67% RR was achieved with disease control in 91% - CR 2 pts (4%),<br />
PR 29 (63%) & SD in 11pts (24%). Two pts with inoperable colonic tumours had<br />
curative resections after chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy; no patients had liver only disease. Grade 3<br />
toxicities included diarrhoea (21%), lethargy (17%), neutropenia (8%), paras<strong>the</strong>sia<br />
(17% G2, no G3) and alopecia (4% G2). Only 14 pts have died so OS is expected to<br />
increase with longer review. At baseline 50% pts had ≥3 CTCs suggesting this cohort<br />
comprised a poor prognostic group; median PFS/OS of <strong>the</strong>se pts was 8.5/18.8<br />
months(m), considerably better than expected (cf 6.1/11.6m in Cohen1). Pts with 5 Ug/L<br />
(primary tumor is a “secretor”) whilst 50.5% did not have elevated pre-op CEA<br />
(“non-secretor”). The pre-op CEA value is prognostic (continuous variable, p <<br />
0.01). During follow-up, all non-secretors and 58% of secretors achieved a trough<br />
CEA < 5 Ug/L. Achieving a trough CEA 5 Ug/<br />
L prior to relapse was observed in 51% of all patients. This new rise was more<br />
likely to be observed among patients whose initial primary was secretory (p <<br />
0.01). The median time from new rise in CEA to clinical relapse was 2.4 months.<br />
This was not different between initial secretors and non-secretors. At clinical<br />
relapse, 82% of initial secretors vs 47% of initial non-secretors had elevated CEA<br />
(p < 0.01).<br />
Conclusions: Pre-operative CEA levels prior to initial surgery influence CEA<br />
dynamics post curative resection in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Among<br />
secretors, fall to baseline CEA is associated with longer time to recurrence. Among<br />
all patients, a new rise in CEA is more likely to occur in patients whose initial<br />
primary is secretory. Once this new rise occurs, median time to recurrence is 2.4<br />
months and this duration is not dependent on initial secretory status.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
584P FDG-PET TUMOR LOAD PARAMETERS MEASURED BY TOTAL<br />
LESION GLYCOLYSIS AS PREDICTORS OF TREATMENT<br />
RESPONSE AND OUTCOME IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL<br />
CANCER<br />
H. El Mansy 1 , C. Garcia 2 , A. Deleporte 1 , L. Ameye 3 , A. Hendlisz 1 , P. Flamen 2<br />
1 Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM, 2 Nuclear<br />
Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM, 3 Data Centre, Institute Jules<br />
Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM<br />
Objectives: Early metabolic response measured by <strong>the</strong> change of FDG maximum<br />
Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) on PET-CT after 1 cycle of chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy in<br />
patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can predict negative objective<br />
response and is correlated to Overall Survival (OS) (Hendlisz et al. 2011). The aim of<br />
this work is to assess <strong>the</strong> correlation between <strong>the</strong> change in FDG-PET whole body<br />
metabolic tumoral load parameters and <strong>the</strong> RECIST response, progression free<br />
survival (PFS), OS.<br />
Methods: FDG-PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and on Day 14, in 41<br />
patients with unresectable mCRC undergoing a biweekly chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy regimen.<br />
Patients were followed-up for up to 28 months. The change in Functional Tumor<br />
Volume (FTV) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) (TLG = FTV x SUVmean) of all<br />
<strong>the</strong> lesions was calculated using a fixed threshold segmentation algorithm (threshold<br />
for segmentation = SUV mean of 30 mm sphere in <strong>the</strong> right lobe of <strong>the</strong> liver plus 3<br />
standard deviations) corrected to lean body mass (Wahl et al 2009). Predictive and<br />
prognostic value was tested through correlation with RECIST response (using<br />
independent dedicated CT), PFS and OS. A cutoff value for TLG responding patients<br />
was set at 40% or more decrease in <strong>the</strong> baseline value.<br />
Results: 39 patients were evaluable for analysis. The median OS was 20 months (95%<br />
CI, 10 to 28), <strong>the</strong> change in whole body FTV and TLG were significantly related to<br />
RECIST response (p-value: 0.015 and 0.0038), to PFS (P-value: 0.009, 0.018) and to<br />
OS (p-value: 0.002, 0.0027). Patients with > 40% decrease in TLG have better PFS:<br />
median 12 months compared to median 3 months in <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> patients [log<br />
rank test p-value 0.004; HR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.72)], and a better median OS 27<br />
months compared to 11 months [log rank test p-value 0.05; HR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.14<br />
to 1.04)].<br />
Conclusions: Changes in <strong>the</strong> metabolic tumoral load parameters after one cycle of<br />
standard chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for mCRC are predictors of RECIST response, progression<br />
free and overall survival.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds397 | ix199