24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annals of Oncology<br />

Results: SA #1 (Table) showed significant improvement in PFS with<br />

aflibercept-FOLFIRI compared to placebo-FOLFIRI (P < 0.00001), thus confirming<br />

primary PFS analysis. SA #2 also showed an improvement in PFS with aflibercept vs<br />

placebo; difference was not significant (P = 0.0017) at <strong>the</strong> 0.0001 α level.<br />

Discrepancies between IRC and investigators’ assessments were noted in placebo (n<br />

= 273, 45.8%) and aflibercept (n = 231, 39.3%) arms. An unstratified log-rank test<br />

comparing primary PFS in <strong>the</strong> two arms was consistent with <strong>the</strong> stratified analysis,<br />

showing a significant difference in PFS with aflibercept (P = 0.00005). Aflibercept<br />

showed typical anti-VEGF side effects.<br />

Conclusion: The data from <strong>the</strong>se PFS sensitivity analyses (SAs) are consistent with<br />

<strong>the</strong> primary analysis of PFS in VELOUR, fur<strong>the</strong>r supporting <strong>the</strong> statistically<br />

significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS seen in <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

analysis. Funded by Sanofi & Regeneron<br />

Analysis: PFS<br />

(months) Placebo N = 614 Aflibercept N = 612 HR [99.99% CI]<br />

Primary: 4.67 4.07 – 5.55 6.90 5.88 – 7.85 0.758 [0.578 – 0.995]<br />

SA #1: 4.53 4.07 – 5.68 6.97 6.05 – 8.51 0.654 [0.477 – 0.895]<br />

SA #2: 4.50 4.04 – 5.55 6.24 5.49 – 7.19 0.814 [0.630 – 1.052]<br />

Disclosure: E. Van Cutsem: I have received research funding from Sanofi.<br />

J. Tabernero: I have an advisory relationship with sanofi, for which I have been<br />

compensated. R. Lakomy: I have received research funding from Sanofi. P. Ruff: I<br />

have received honorarium from Amgen, Merck AG, Roche, Sanofi and Pfizer. I have<br />

received research funding from Amgen, Merck AG, Sanofi and Pfizer. I have received<br />

travel grants from Amgen, Roche, and Pfizer. D. Ferry: I have an advisory<br />

relationship with Sanofi. I have received honorarium from Sanofi. E. Boelle: I am an<br />

employee of Sanofi. C. Allegra: I have an advisory relationship with Sanofi. All o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

582P A PHASE II STUDY OF COMBINED CETUXIMAB, IRINOTECAN,<br />

OXALIPLATIN AND UFT (ESCOUT) IN PATIENTS WITH<br />

ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER (ACRC) INCORPORATING<br />

ANALYSIS OF CIRCULATING TUMOUR CELLS (CTCS)<br />

M. Krebs 1 , S. Gollins 2 , I. Chau 3 , J. Hasan 4 , M. Braun 4 , K. Morris 1 , J. Beech 4 ,<br />

G. Adaway 4 , C. Dive 1 , M.P. Saunders 4<br />

1 Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer<br />

Research, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM, 2 Clinical Oncology, North Wales<br />

Cancer Treatment Centre, Wales, UNITED KINGDOM, 3 Medicine, Royal Marsden<br />

Hospital, Sutton, UNITED KINGDOM, 4 Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS<br />

Foundation Trust, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Introduction: Patients (pts) with ≥3 CTCs/7.5ml blood at baseline, enumerated by<br />

<strong>the</strong> CellSearch® (Veridex) system, have poor overall survival (OS)1. CTC guided<br />

treatment strategies may improve pt outcomes. This study investigated <strong>the</strong> efficacy of<br />

combining 4 active agents and evaluated CTC numbers for prognostic and<br />

pharmacodynamic utility.<br />

Methods: Pts with previously untreated, inoperable, ACRC and wtKRAS were<br />

eligible. Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy was administered every 28 days with Cetuximab 400 mg/m 2<br />

D1 & D15 and UFT 250 mg/m 2 with calcium folinate 30mg TDS D1-21. UFT dose<br />

was reduced by 1 caps/day for grade 2/3 diarrhoea. Irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 D1 and<br />

oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 D15 alternated to reduce long-term toxicity of each drug.<br />

Treatment was continued until disease progression. The primary end-point was<br />

response rate (RR) and secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS),<br />

OS, toxicity and CTC number. Blood samples (7.5ml) for CTC analysis were drawn<br />

at baseline and D15. CTCs were enumerated using <strong>the</strong> CellSearch® system. Results:<br />

Forty-eight pts were recruited; 46 were evaluable for response and 42 for CTC<br />

enumeration. A 67% RR was achieved with disease control in 91% - CR 2 pts (4%),<br />

PR 29 (63%) & SD in 11pts (24%). Two pts with inoperable colonic tumours had<br />

curative resections after chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy; no patients had liver only disease. Grade 3<br />

toxicities included diarrhoea (21%), lethargy (17%), neutropenia (8%), paras<strong>the</strong>sia<br />

(17% G2, no G3) and alopecia (4% G2). Only 14 pts have died so OS is expected to<br />

increase with longer review. At baseline 50% pts had ≥3 CTCs suggesting this cohort<br />

comprised a poor prognostic group; median PFS/OS of <strong>the</strong>se pts was 8.5/18.8<br />

months(m), considerably better than expected (cf 6.1/11.6m in Cohen1). Pts with 5 Ug/L<br />

(primary tumor is a “secretor”) whilst 50.5% did not have elevated pre-op CEA<br />

(“non-secretor”). The pre-op CEA value is prognostic (continuous variable, p <<br />

0.01). During follow-up, all non-secretors and 58% of secretors achieved a trough<br />

CEA < 5 Ug/L. Achieving a trough CEA 5 Ug/<br />

L prior to relapse was observed in 51% of all patients. This new rise was more<br />

likely to be observed among patients whose initial primary was secretory (p <<br />

0.01). The median time from new rise in CEA to clinical relapse was 2.4 months.<br />

This was not different between initial secretors and non-secretors. At clinical<br />

relapse, 82% of initial secretors vs 47% of initial non-secretors had elevated CEA<br />

(p < 0.01).<br />

Conclusions: Pre-operative CEA levels prior to initial surgery influence CEA<br />

dynamics post curative resection in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Among<br />

secretors, fall to baseline CEA is associated with longer time to recurrence. Among<br />

all patients, a new rise in CEA is more likely to occur in patients whose initial<br />

primary is secretory. Once this new rise occurs, median time to recurrence is 2.4<br />

months and this duration is not dependent on initial secretory status.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

584P FDG-PET TUMOR LOAD PARAMETERS MEASURED BY TOTAL<br />

LESION GLYCOLYSIS AS PREDICTORS OF TREATMENT<br />

RESPONSE AND OUTCOME IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL<br />

CANCER<br />

H. El Mansy 1 , C. Garcia 2 , A. Deleporte 1 , L. Ameye 3 , A. Hendlisz 1 , P. Flamen 2<br />

1 Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM, 2 Nuclear<br />

Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM, 3 Data Centre, Institute Jules<br />

Bordet, Brussels, BELGIUM<br />

Objectives: Early metabolic response measured by <strong>the</strong> change of FDG maximum<br />

Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) on PET-CT after 1 cycle of chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy in<br />

patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) can predict negative objective<br />

response and is correlated to Overall Survival (OS) (Hendlisz et al. 2011). The aim of<br />

this work is to assess <strong>the</strong> correlation between <strong>the</strong> change in FDG-PET whole body<br />

metabolic tumoral load parameters and <strong>the</strong> RECIST response, progression free<br />

survival (PFS), OS.<br />

Methods: FDG-PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and on Day 14, in 41<br />

patients with unresectable mCRC undergoing a biweekly chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy regimen.<br />

Patients were followed-up for up to 28 months. The change in Functional Tumor<br />

Volume (FTV) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) (TLG = FTV x SUVmean) of all<br />

<strong>the</strong> lesions was calculated using a fixed threshold segmentation algorithm (threshold<br />

for segmentation = SUV mean of 30 mm sphere in <strong>the</strong> right lobe of <strong>the</strong> liver plus 3<br />

standard deviations) corrected to lean body mass (Wahl et al 2009). Predictive and<br />

prognostic value was tested through correlation with RECIST response (using<br />

independent dedicated CT), PFS and OS. A cutoff value for TLG responding patients<br />

was set at 40% or more decrease in <strong>the</strong> baseline value.<br />

Results: 39 patients were evaluable for analysis. The median OS was 20 months (95%<br />

CI, 10 to 28), <strong>the</strong> change in whole body FTV and TLG were significantly related to<br />

RECIST response (p-value: 0.015 and 0.0038), to PFS (P-value: 0.009, 0.018) and to<br />

OS (p-value: 0.002, 0.0027). Patients with > 40% decrease in TLG have better PFS:<br />

median 12 months compared to median 3 months in <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> patients [log<br />

rank test p-value 0.004; HR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.72)], and a better median OS 27<br />

months compared to 11 months [log rank test p-value 0.05; HR 0.38 (95% CI, 0.14<br />

to 1.04)].<br />

Conclusions: Changes in <strong>the</strong> metabolic tumoral load parameters after one cycle of<br />

standard chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for mCRC are predictors of RECIST response, progression<br />

free and overall survival.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds397 | ix199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!