Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RO and Cd, as well as PD data for circulating angiogenic factors will be<br />
presented.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
449PD PHASE 1 DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL OF THE<br />
INVESTIGATIONAL HEDGEHOG (HH) PATHWAY INHIBITOR<br />
TAK-441 IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS<br />
J.W. Goldman 1 , S.G. Eckhardt 2 , M. Borad 3 , M. Hidalgo 4 , D.P. Ryan 5 , A. Parikh 6 ,<br />
S. Kuan 7 ,J.Yu 7 , S. Stewart 1 , L.S. Rosen 1<br />
1 Hematology / Oncology, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA, UNITED<br />
STATES OF AMERICA, 2 Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of<br />
Medicine, Aurora, CO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3 Hematology / Oncology,<br />
Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4 GIi Cancer Clinical<br />
Research Unit, CNIO- Spanish National Cancer Center, Madrid, SPAIN,<br />
5 Hematology / Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, UNITED<br />
STATES OF AMERICA, 6 General Medicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals<br />
International, Inc., Deerfield, IL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 7 Clinical<br />
Pharmacology, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, UNITED<br />
STATES OF AMERICA<br />
Background: Dysregulation of <strong>the</strong> Hh pathway is a principal event in <strong>the</strong><br />
carcinogenesis of multiple tumor types, including basal cell carcinoma. TAK-441 is<br />
an investigational, orally-available inhibitor of <strong>the</strong> G protein-coupled receptor<br />
Smoo<strong>the</strong>ned, a component of <strong>the</strong> Hh signalling cascade.<br />
Methods: This study (NCT01204073) was designed to determine safety, maximum<br />
tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum feasible dose (MFD) in patients with advanced<br />
solid tumors. Cycles consisted of 3 weeks continuous dosing, with a single-dose cycle<br />
1 lead-in, followed by 7 d pharmacokinetics (PK). Dose escalation (DE) proceeded in<br />
a modified 3 + 3 fashion. Radiographic tumor assessments were performed after<br />
cycles 2, 4, and every 4 cycles <strong>the</strong>reafter.<br />
Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in <strong>the</strong> DE phase, median age 59 y (range<br />
28–82), and treated with doses from 50–1600 mg daily. TAK-441 concentrations<br />
were quantifiable in plasma after <strong>the</strong> starting 50 mg dose, with total exposure<br />
increasing dose-proportionally to 800 mg. Maximum plasma concentration typically<br />
was reached 3 h post-dose. The median terminal disposition half-life was 15 h (range<br />
6–35 h). DLTs of Gr 3 fatigue and muscle spasms were observed in 1 pt at <strong>the</strong> 1600<br />
mg dose. Six subjects discontinued due to an adverse event (AE) including a patient<br />
who suffered a fatal cerebral hemorrhage in cycle 4 related to 50 mg TAK-441. Most<br />
common treatment-emergent AEs were muscle spasms (44%), dysguesia (41%),<br />
nausea (41%), fatigue (38%) and constipation (28%). The MFD is 1600 mg and <strong>the</strong><br />
MTD has not been reached. Four patients remained on trial for >10 cycles, and 3<br />
patients continue on treatment. Response and PK/PD data will be presented.<br />
Conclusions: TAK-441 was well-tolerated up to an MFD of 1600 mg taken once<br />
daily. A dose expansion cohort has been initiated at 800 mg in patients with<br />
untreated basal cell carcinoma.<br />
Disclosure: S.G. Eckhardt: Consultancy, Research funding and Speakers Bureau/<br />
Advisory Committee for Millennium/Takeda. S. Kuan: Employment with Millennium<br />
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Yu: Employment and consultancy for Millennium. L.S. Rosen:<br />
Research support from Millennium. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
450PD A PHASE IB COMBINATION STUDY OF RO4929097 (RO), A<br />
GAMMA-SECRETASE INHIBITOR, AND TEMSIROLIMUS<br />
(TEM) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS<br />
I. Diaz-Padilla 1 , S.J. Hotte 2 , S.P. Ivy 3 , A.M. Oza 1 , H.W. Hirte 2 , A.R.A. Razak 1 ,<br />
E.X. Chen 1 , I. Brana Garcia 1 , L. Siu 1 , P. Bedard 1<br />
1 Dept. of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital,<br />
Toronto, ON, CANADA, 2 Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton,<br />
ON, CANADA, 3 Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute,<br />
Be<strong>the</strong>sda, MD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />
Background: The notch signalling pathway has a critical role in regulating cellular<br />
differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. RO is a potent and selective gamma-secretase<br />
inhibitor with antitumor activity in animal models. Pre-clinical experiments indicate that<br />
<strong>the</strong> PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway may mediate resistance to gamma secretase inhibitors,<br />
providing a rationale for combination <strong>the</strong>rapy with RO and TEM.<br />
Methods: A phase Ib dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 design was conducted.<br />
Three dose levels (DLs) were planned. Objectives were to determine <strong>the</strong><br />
recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and<br />
pharmacodynamics (PD) of <strong>the</strong> combination. Eligible pts received once daily oral<br />
RO on a 3 day on/4 day off schedule every week (QW), and intravenous QW<br />
TEM. Initial doses were 10 mg RO and 25 mg TEM. Cycles were every 21 days,<br />
except for cycle 1, which was 28 days. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities<br />
(DLTs) were evaluated during cycle 1.<br />
Results: 17 pts (data cut-off 26-Apr-<strong>2012</strong>) have been treated on three DLs. Number of<br />
pts, DLTs and schedule are shown in Table 1. Demographics: M:F 6:11; median age: 60<br />
yrs (range 28-84); ECOG 0/1:4/13. Pts received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-12). The<br />
most common adverse events (AEs) related to <strong>the</strong> study drug combination included:<br />
fatigue (82%; G3 6%), mucositis, (71%; G3 6%), neutropenia (59%; G3 12%), anemia<br />
(59%;G30%),andhypertriglyceridemia(59%,G30%).TwoDLTs(G3rash,G3<br />
mucositis) were observed in <strong>the</strong> same patient in DL1 prompting dose expansion. No<br />
additional DLTs were observed. Of 15 patients evaluable for response, no objective<br />
responses were observed. 11 pts (73%) had stable disease (SD) as <strong>the</strong>ir best response; with<br />
3 pts (sarcoma, neuroendocrine, non-small cell lung cancer) on <strong>the</strong>rapy for ≥6 cycles.<br />
Conclusions: RO can be safely combined with TEM. The RP2D was established as<br />
RO at 20 mg combined with 37.5 mg of TEM. PK and circulating angiogenic factors<br />
analyses will be presented.<br />
RO Dose<br />
(mg)<br />
TEM Dose<br />
(mg)<br />
No. of pts<br />
treated<br />
No. of pts<br />
with DLT DLT<br />
Dose Level<br />
1 †<br />
10 25 8 1 G3 rash, G3<br />
mucositis<br />
2 20 25 3 0<br />
3 ∧<br />
20 37.5 6 0<br />
† 2 pts were not evaluable for DLT ∧ DL3 (RP2D) was expanded to 6 pts<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
Annals of Oncology<br />
451P PHASE I AND PHARMACOKINETICS/PHARMACODYNAMICS<br />
(PK/PD) STUDY OF MEK INHIBITOR, RO4987655, IN<br />
JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS<br />
S. Nakamichi 1 , H. Nokihara 1 , N. Yamamoto 1 , Y. Tamura 1 , K. Honda 1 , H. Wakui 1 ,<br />
Y. Yamada 2 , N. Yamazaki 3 , S. Suzuki 4 , T. Tamura 1<br />
1 Division of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, JAPAN,<br />
2 Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo,<br />
JAPAN, 3 Division of Dermatological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital,<br />
Tokyo, JAPAN, 4 Division of Ophthalmic Oncology, National Cancer Center<br />
Hospital, Tokyo, JAPAN<br />
Background: RO4987655, an oral and selective inhibitor of MEK, is a key enzyme of<br />
<strong>the</strong> MAPK signaling pathway. This was a phase I, non-randomized, open-label,<br />
dose-escalation study in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary<br />
objectives were determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on<br />
dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety evaluation and PK analysis. Secondary<br />
objectives were PD analysis and exploratory analysis of RO4987655’s anti-tumor<br />
activity according to <strong>the</strong> RECIST 1.0 criteria.<br />
Methods: Patients received an oral single dose of RO4987655 (1, 2, 4, 5, and 6.5 mg)<br />
(Cycle 0) followed by continuous once daily dosing (QD, 1, 2, and 4 mg/day) <strong>the</strong>n<br />
twice daily dosing (4, 5, and 6.5 mg BID, total daily dose: 8, 10, and 13 mg/day) in<br />
28-day cycles. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Blood samples for PK analysis<br />
were collected in Cycle 0 (Day 1, 2, and 3) and in Cycle 1 (Day 1, 8, 15, and 22). PD<br />
was evaluated by pERK inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).<br />
Results: As of March <strong>2012</strong>, 25 patients were enrolled in 6 cohorts of 1, 2, 4, 8, 10,<br />
and 13 mg/day. Four DLTs were observed in <strong>the</strong> 13 mg/day (n = 2) and 10 mg/day<br />
(n = 2) cohorts, all of <strong>the</strong>m reversible Grade 3 creatine phosphokinase (CPK)<br />
elevation. MTD was defined as 8 mg/day. Most commonly related adverse events<br />
(AEs) included dermatitis acneiform, CPK elevation, and eye disorders. Plasma<br />
exposure of RO4987655 appeared to increase in a dose-proportional manner with a<br />
plasma half-life (t1/2) of 14.0 to 24.4 hours. After multiple dose administration,<br />
steady-state conditions were reached by Cycle 1 Day 8 (240 hours). The inhibitory<br />
effects of RO4987655 on pERK in PBMCs increased in a dose-dependent manner.<br />
Conclusions: The MTD of RO4987655 for Japanese patients was defined as 8 mg/<br />
day. RO4987655 has a manageable safety profile with a favorable PK/PD correlation<br />
in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.<br />
Disclosure: S. Nakamichi: This phase I clinical trial is sponsored by Chugai<br />
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. H. Nokihara: This phase I clinical trial is sponsored by<br />
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. N. Yamamoto: This phase I clinical trial is<br />
sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Y. Tamura: This phase I clinical trial<br />
is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. K. Honda: This phase I clinical trial<br />
is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. H. Wakui: This phase I clinical trial<br />
is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Y. Yamada: This phase I clinical<br />
trial is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. N. Yamazaki: This phase I<br />
clinical trial is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. S. Suzuki: This phase I<br />
clinical trial is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. T. Tamura: This phase<br />
I clinical trial is sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.<br />
ix156 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>