24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204P EVALUATION OF PTEN AND PIK3CA STATUS IN BREAST<br />

CANCER FOR PATIENT SELECTION<br />

V. Serra 1 , J. Rodon 2 , C.M. Aura 3 , A. Vivancos 4 , K. Stemke-Hale 5 ,<br />

H. Hibshoosh 6 , Y. Wang 7 , S. Ramon Y Cajal 3 , J. Tabernero 8 , J. Baselga 9<br />

1 Experimental Therapeutics Laboratory, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN, 2 Phase I Unit, Medical Oncology Service, VHIO, Barcelona,<br />

SPAIN, 3 Molecular Pathology Laboratory, VHIO, Barcelona, SPAIN, 4 Cancer<br />

Genomics Group, VHIO, Barcelona, SPAIN, 5 Systems Biology, MD Anderson<br />

Cancer Center, Houston, TX, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 6 Department of<br />

Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, UNITED STATES<br />

OF AMERICA, 7 Assay Application & Product Development, Mip, Affymetrix,<br />

Santa Clara, CA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Medical Oncology /<br />

Gastrointestinal Tumors Group, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital / VHIO,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN, 9 Hematology/Oncology, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts<br />

General Hospital, Boston, MA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

PTEN and PIK3CA status are potential predictors of response to PI3K-pathway<br />

inhibitors. Therefore, we searched <strong>the</strong> most reliable platform to assess both PTEN<br />

expression and PIK3CA mutations in primary and metastatic breast cancer (BC).<br />

We cross-validated <strong>the</strong> assays between different institutions. Studies were<br />

performed using four different sample sets of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded<br />

(FFPE) breast cancers from VHUH/VHIO and from Columbia University. PTEN<br />

alterations were genotyped in 14 TNBCs by Oncoscan TM platform (Affymetrix)<br />

and were correlated to immunohistochemistry (IHC). PTEN loss of heterozygosity<br />

(LOH, n = 4) with or without overlapping PTEN mutation (n = 5) was concordant<br />

to PTEN protein loss (H-Score < 60) by IHC in 7 samples (7/8, 88%<br />

concordance). PTEN protein loss by IHC was also cross-validated between two<br />

institutions. In a cohort of 12 TNBCs containing eight PTEN low samples, only<br />

two samples were discordant (2/12, 17% discordance). Paired primary versus<br />

metastatic tumors were identified to transit ei<strong>the</strong>r way, in <strong>the</strong> PTEN assessment<br />

by IHC (2/8 paired samples, 25% transition). PIK3CA mutations by Oncoscan TM<br />

were concordant to MassARRAY (Sequenom) in 4 out of 5 mutated samples<br />

within <strong>the</strong> panel of 17 BCs. The discrepancy (1/17, 6%) was likely due to<br />

differences in <strong>the</strong> sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> two assays. In ano<strong>the</strong>r cohort of 21 BC<br />

samples, PIK3CA mutational status was cross-validated by MassARRAY at two<br />

institutions (MDACC and VHIO). Using identical, customized panels we found<br />

that only two samples were discordant because of mutant allele frequency close to<br />

<strong>the</strong> sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> assay (10%). Among 14 paired primary vs metastatic breast<br />

cancers we detected two transitions from wild type (WT) to H1047R mutation<br />

and one transition from E545K to WT (3/14, 21% transition), underscoring <strong>the</strong><br />

need to determine PIK3CA status in metastatic lesions. The divergence evaluating<br />

PTEN and PIK3CA status between institutions was due to different scoring<br />

methodologies and to sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> assays respectively. For patient<br />

pre-screening purposes, MassARRAY and IHC can be performed at each<br />

institution both in primary and metastatic breast cancer lesions. Oncoscan TM is a<br />

valid, centralized platform for evaluation of PTEN and PIK3CA genomic<br />

alterations in BC.<br />

Disclosure: Y. Wang: Yuker Wang is employee of Affymetrix Inc. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors<br />

have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

205P SIGNIFICANCE OF C-MET AS A THERAPEUTIC TARGET<br />

IN TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER<br />

S. Kashiwagi, M. Yashiro, N. Aomatsu, H. Kawajiri, T. Takashima, N. Onoda,<br />

T. Ishikawa, K. Hirakawa<br />

Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka,<br />

JAPAN<br />

Background: The molecular and biological mechanisms of cancer proliferation and<br />

metastasis are being elucidated. Therapies targeting <strong>the</strong> biological characteristics of<br />

various cancers have been adopted. Hormone <strong>the</strong>rapy, molecular target <strong>the</strong>rapy, etc.,<br />

are chosen depending on against estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR)<br />

and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressions in breast cancer.<br />

However, no effective <strong>the</strong>rapy is available for ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative<br />

triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) because <strong>the</strong>ir targets are unknown. c-met<br />

tyrosine kinase receptor for Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has attracted attention<br />

as a novel molecular target of cancer <strong>the</strong>rapy. The c-met receptor for HGF is<br />

involved in <strong>the</strong> migration, invasion, and proliferation of cancer cells. The activation<br />

mechanisms of c-met include <strong>the</strong> overexpression, amplification, and mutation of <strong>the</strong><br />

met gene, as well as ligand binding. Increased c-met protein expression, including<br />

coexpression with its ligand HGF, is observed in various cancers. Reportedly, <strong>the</strong><br />

prognosis of breast cancer is correlated with HGF/c-met coexpression and c-met<br />

overexpression. c-met signaling plays an important role in <strong>the</strong> proliferation of breast<br />

cancer cells. However, few reports have been published regarding <strong>the</strong>ir correlation<br />

with TNBC.<br />

Material and methods: A total of 1,036 patients who had undergone resection of a<br />

primary breast cancer at our institute were enrolled. ER / PR / HER2 status and<br />

c-met expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry. In vitro study, TNBC cell<br />

lines, MDA-MB 231 and OCUB-2, and non-TNBC cell lines, MCF-7 and OCUB-1,<br />

were used. c-met mRNA expression was examined by RT-PCR. Then, <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />

Annals of Oncology<br />

HGF, c-met siRNA, and c-met inhibitors on <strong>the</strong> proliferation of breast cancer cell<br />

lines were examined.<br />

Results: The 1,036 patients included 190 TNBC patients, whose prognoses were<br />

poorer than those of non-TNBC patients. In <strong>the</strong> TNBC patients, <strong>the</strong> c-met<br />

expression-positive group showed a poorer prognosis than <strong>the</strong> control group. c-met<br />

was expressed in <strong>the</strong> TNBC cell lines, whose proliferation was enhanced by HGF.<br />

c-met kinase inhibitors and c-met siRNA inhibited <strong>the</strong> proliferation of TNBC cell<br />

lines.<br />

Conclusion: c-met expression is a potential molecular target and useful in classifying<br />

TNBC.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

206P PREDICTION OF DISEASE OUTCOME WITH QUANTITATIVE<br />

MEASUREMENT OF HER-2 RECEPTOR EXPRESSION AND<br />

DIMERIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER<br />

H. Bazin 1 , F. Andre 2 , M. Mathieu 3 , A. Ho-Pun-Cheung 4 , E. Lopez-Crapez 4 ,<br />

G. Mathis 1 , P. Garnero 1<br />

1 Research, Cisbio Bioassays, Codolet, FRANCE, 2 Department of Medical<br />

Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, FRANCE, 3 Department of Pathology,<br />

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, FRANCE, 4 Translational Research Unit, CRLC<br />

Val d’Aurelle Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, FRANCE<br />

Introduction: Expression of HER2 is commonly assessed by immunohistochemistry<br />

(IHC) and IHC-HER2 positive patients with breast cancer are candidate for<br />

anti-HER2 <strong>the</strong>rapy. However IHC is not quantitative, does not allow to detect subtle<br />

changes in HER2 expression and cannot assess HER2 dimerization which is critical<br />

for its activation. The aim of this study was to quantify <strong>the</strong> expression and<br />

dimerization of HER2 in patients with breast cancer and to relate <strong>the</strong>se<br />

measurements to disease outcome.<br />

Methods: Using a novel microtiter plate based Time Resolved Fluorescence<br />

(TR-FRET) assay we quantify HER2 receptor expression and dimerization on frozen<br />

tumor samples from 100 patients with breast cancer. Normalized fluorescence signals<br />

allowed a quantitative measure of <strong>the</strong> overall receptors/dimers expression. Disease<br />

free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in each subject.<br />

Results: Among <strong>the</strong> 100 patients, 82 were IHC-HER2 negative, including 60 subjects<br />

who were ER+ and treated with hormonal <strong>the</strong>rapy. Using Cox proportional hazard<br />

analyses we showed that in IHC-HER2 negative, ER+ subjects, <strong>the</strong> presence of HER2<br />

dimer was significantly associated with both reduced DFS (p = 0.0001) and OS<br />

(p = 0.00237). Quantitative measure of HER2 expression was also associated with<br />

DFS (p = 0.0005) and OS (p = 0.03).<br />

Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of expression and dimerization of HER2 by<br />

<strong>the</strong> novel TR-FRET assay predicts disease outcome in IHC-HER2 negative, ER+<br />

breast cancer patients. These new biomarkers may be useful to identify failure<br />

patients to hormonal treatment who may benefit from adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy with<br />

anti-HER <strong>the</strong>rapy. Validation series is ongoing in 200 FFPE-samples and will be<br />

presented.<br />

Disclosure: F. Andre: research funding. M. Mathieu: research funding. All o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

207P KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS AND OXALIPLATIN SENSITIVITY:<br />

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MOON?<br />

A. Orlandi, M. Di Salvatore, M. Basso, C. Bagalà, A. Strippoli, A. Calegari,<br />

A. Astone, C. Pozzo, A. Cassano, C. Barone<br />

Unit of Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, ITALY<br />

Background: Oxaliplatin is a milestone of colorectal cancer <strong>the</strong>rapy, but it is still<br />

lacking of a validated predictive biomarker of response. In a recent retrospective<br />

study we found a greater efficacy of oxaliplatin in KRAS mutated patients with<br />

metastatic colorectal cancer. Aim of <strong>the</strong> present study is to investigate “in vitro” <strong>the</strong><br />

molecular basis of this finding and <strong>the</strong> possible role of ERCC1, <strong>the</strong> main mechanism<br />

of oxaliplatin resistance.<br />

Methods: We selected four colorectal cancer cell lines, two KRAS wild type (wt)<br />

(HCT-8, HT-29) and two KRAS mutated (mt)(SW620, SW480). The sensitivity of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se cell lines to oxaliplatin was evaluated by MTT-test. ERCC1 levels before and<br />

after exposure to oxaliplatin were determined by RT-PCR. KRAS was silenced in a<br />

KRAS mt cell line (SW620) in order to evaluate <strong>the</strong> effect on oxaliplatin sensitivity<br />

and on ERCC1 levels. ERCC1 was also silenced in all cell lines to confirm his role in<br />

<strong>the</strong> KRAS-mediated oxaliplatin resistance pathway.<br />

Results: KRAS mt cell lines were more sensitive to oxaliplatin (OR 2,68; IC 95%<br />

1.511-4.757 p < 0.001). KRAS mt and wt cell lines did not show significant<br />

differences in ERCC1 basal levels, however, after 24h exposure to oxaliplatin, only<br />

resistant KRAS wt cell lines showed a statistically significant upregulation of ERCC1<br />

compared to KRAS mt cell lines (OR 42.9; IC 95% 17.260-106.972 p < 0.0005).<br />

Silencing of KRAS demonstrated to reduce Oxaliplatin sensitivity and to restore <strong>the</strong><br />

ability to induce ERCC1 in KRAS mt cell lines. Finally, silencing of ERCC1 increased<br />

Oxaliplatin citotoxicity only in those cells able to upregulate ERCC1 after exposure to<br />

ix84 | <strong>Abstract</strong>s Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!