Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annals of Oncology<br />
847P CLINICAL EFFICACY OF SUNITINIB AS POST-OPERATIVE<br />
ADJUVANT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK RENAL<br />
CELL CARCINOMA<br />
X. Zhang 1 , J.Y. Yuan 2 , L. Wang 2 , L. Chen 3 ,J.Pan 4 ,L.Ye 5 , X. Xiao 6 , J. Qiu 7 ,<br />
K. Zhang 8 ,G.Ye 9<br />
1 Urology Department, The General Hospital of <strong>the</strong> People’s Liberation Army,<br />
Beijing, CHINA, 2 Urology Department, Xijin Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Fourth Military Medical<br />
University, Xian, CHINA, 3 Urology Department, 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing,<br />
CHINA, 4 Urology Department, Southwest Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Third Military Medical<br />
University, Chongqing, CHINA, 5 Urology Department, 304 Hospital of PLA,<br />
Beijing, CHINA, 6 Urology Department, General Hospital of Armed Police Forces,<br />
Beijing, CHINA, 7 Urology Department, Bethune International Peace Hospital of<br />
PLA, Jilin, CHINA, 8 Urology Department, Daping Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Third Military<br />
Medical University, Chongqing, CHINA, 9 Urology Department, Xinqiao Hospital,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, CHINA<br />
Objective: To evaluate <strong>the</strong> efficacy and safety of Sunitinib as post-operative adjuvant<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapy in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC).<br />
Methods: A total of 60 patients with resected, histologically confirmed clear cell RCC<br />
were enrolled in this study. Patients received orally Sunitinib ei<strong>the</strong>r at a dose of 50mg<br />
on treatment schedule 4/2 (once daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off) or at a<br />
dose of 37.5mg once daily for three 6-week cycles from 1 month after surgery.<br />
Results: All 60 patients tolerated Sunitinib treatment well and no patient<br />
discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Most adverse events were grade I to II.<br />
The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (56.7%),<br />
thrombocytopenia (53.3%), leucopenia (48.3%), hand-foot syndrome (46.7%) and<br />
hypertension (36.7%). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were<br />
thrombocytopenia (25%), neutropenia (15%), hand-foot syndrome (11.7%) and<br />
leucopenia (8.3%). The majority of adverse events occurred within <strong>the</strong> first 1-2 cycles<br />
of Sunitinib treatment, and was ameliorated 1 month after 3 cycles finished. No<br />
irreversible adverse event was observed. As of April 5, <strong>2012</strong>, no recurrence occurred<br />
in patients except one death due to cerebrovascular accident unrelated to treatment,<br />
with both 6-month and 9-month disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 100%.<br />
Conclusion: Myelosuppression occurred less frequently in high-risk RCC patients<br />
treated with Sunitinib as operative adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy than in advanced RCC patients,<br />
with a better benefit trend. However, long-term follow-up data are needed to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
confirm <strong>the</strong> efficacy of Sunitinib in <strong>the</strong> adjuvant setting.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
848P OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL<br />
CARCINOMA (MRCC): A COMPARISON BETWEEN SORAFENIB<br />
(SO) AND BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE (BSC) AFTER FIRST LINE<br />
TREATMENT WITH SUNITINIB (SU) IN SWEDEN<br />
P. Sandström 1 , R. Sandin 2 , J. Kowalski 3 , T. Wahlgren 4 , M. Jakobsson 4 ,<br />
S. Lundstam 5 , B. Ljungberg 6 , U. Harmenberg 1<br />
1 Department of Oncology-pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and<br />
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SWEDEN, 2 Global Health Economics and<br />
Outcomes Research, Onology, Pfizer AB, Sollentuna, SWEDEN, 3 Department of<br />
Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital<br />
Huddinge and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SWEDEN, 4 Oncology, Pfizer AB,<br />
Sollentuna, SWEDEN, 5 Department of Urology, University Hospital, and <strong>the</strong><br />
Sahlgrenska Academy, Go<strong>the</strong>nburg, SWEDEN, 6 Department of Surgical and<br />
Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå,<br />
SWEDEN<br />
Background: There is a paucity of efficacy data after first line treatment with SU in<br />
mRCC. This retrospective register study compared OS in patients treated with SO<br />
and BSC after first line treatment with SU in Sweden.<br />
Methods: Three Swedish national health registers were used: <strong>the</strong> Swedish Cancer<br />
register (diagnosis and death), <strong>the</strong> National Patient Register (in-/out-patient data),<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. 135 patients identified with mRCC,<br />
diagnosed no later than 2009, were recorded as having received 1st-line treatment<br />
with SU; 59 patients received SO and 76 patients received BSC. Multivariate analysis<br />
was performed using <strong>the</strong> Cox proportional hazards model including estimation of<br />
adjusted OS. The regression model included <strong>the</strong> covariates: age, gender,<br />
nephrectomy, time since diagnosis and metastatic disease, time since mRCC<br />
diagnoses and start of systemic <strong>the</strong>rapy, geographical region, institutional size, and<br />
duration of first line SU treatment. Sensitivity analysis with combinations of<br />
explanatory variables, was performed to test <strong>the</strong> robustness of <strong>the</strong> results.<br />
Results: Patients characteristics differed between <strong>the</strong> SO and BSC patients, but<br />
available information did not indicate a clear advantage in favor of any treatment<br />
arm. OS for patients prescribed with SO was improved compared with OS for BSC<br />
patients. Including all covariates, median adjusted OS was 9,9 vs. 6,6 months,<br />
respectively for patients treated with SO and BSC (HR = 0.652, 95% CI: 0.412, 1.030;<br />
P < 0.067). Sensitivity analysis showed a robust and significant reduction in risk of<br />
death for patients treated with SO; range of 29-42% (HR: 0,58-0,71). In all models,<br />
nephrectomy was independently associated with significantly improved OS. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
individual covariates were generally not statistically significant, likely due to a low<br />
number of observations.<br />
Conclusion: An improved OS for mRCC patients was seen in patients receiving<br />
SO compared to BSC after first line treatment with SU. Some caution should be<br />
taken with interpreting <strong>the</strong> results as confounding due to unmeasured covariates<br />
may exist.<br />
Disclosure: P. Sandström: Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, Roche, GSK, Novartis,<br />
and Bayer, has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, bayer, GSK and Novartis and<br />
has received research funding from Pfizer and Bayer. R. Sandin: Rickard Sandin is an<br />
employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock. J. Kowalski: Jan Kowalski is concultant<br />
and received compensation from Pfizer for <strong>the</strong> statistical work for <strong>the</strong> abstract.<br />
T. Wahlgren: Thomas Wahlgren is an employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock.<br />
M. Jakobsson: Maria Jakobsson is an employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock.<br />
S. Lundstam: Has had an advisory board role for GSK and Bayer, has received<br />
honoraria from Pfizerand GSK, and has received research funding from Pfizer.<br />
B. Ljungberg: Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, GSK, Novartis, Astellas and Bayer,<br />
and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, GSK and Bayer. U. Harmenberg:<br />
Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, Roche, GSK, Novartis, and Bayer, has received<br />
honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis and has received research funding from<br />
Pfizer, GSK and Novartis.<br />
849P SUNITINIB RECHALLANGE IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL<br />
CARCINOMA PATIENTS<br />
K. Nagyivanyi1 , K. Bíró2 , F. Gyergyay2 , Z. Küronya2 , H. Nemeth2 , L. Géczi2 1<br />
Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy C, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, HUNGARY,<br />
2<br />
Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy C and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology,<br />
Budapest, HUNGARY<br />
Background: Sunitinib is an active agent in <strong>the</strong> first line treatment of metastatic clear<br />
cell kidney cancer, based on <strong>the</strong> result of a global phase III study. However, complete<br />
remission is rarely seen and multiply sequential <strong>the</strong>rapies are used in this patient<br />
population. Since options in third line setting are limited, we assessed <strong>the</strong> clinical<br />
activity of sunitinib rechallenge after failure on o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rapies.<br />
Methods: 323 kidney cancer patients were treated with sunitinib from November<br />
2005 to January <strong>2012</strong> in our department. Retrospective data were collected for those<br />
9 patients who we rechallenged with sunitinib failing to at least two previous<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapies, including sunitinib. Patient characteristics, objective response based on<br />
RECIST criteria and progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed. Tumor<br />
assessment was performed every 2nd cycle of sunitinib or every 3 months<br />
Results: Data of 8 men and 1 woman of median age (at sunitinib challenge 59 years,<br />
at sunitinib rechallenge 63 years) with metastatic clear cell cancer of <strong>the</strong> kidney were<br />
analysed. All patients had nephrectomy prior treatment. Initial treatment with<br />
sunitinib was associated with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 13,7<br />
months. Objective response was partial remissions (PR) as best response. At <strong>the</strong> time<br />
of re-exposure patients again showed clinical benefit which was associated with a<br />
median PFS of 6,8 months and consisted of 1 (11%) PR and 5 (55%) disease<br />
stabilizations. PD was seen in 3 (33%) patients.<br />
Conclusions: In sunitinib-responsive patients, re-challenge with sunitinib has been<br />
successful and was well tolerated ei<strong>the</strong>r after an o<strong>the</strong>r TKI or mTOR inhibitor and it<br />
seems to be a valid option as a third line treatment.<br />
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />
850P GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND SUNITINIB TOXICITY IN<br />
METASTATIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA<br />
J. Sepulveda Sanchez 1 , C. Farfan 2 , F. Villacampa 3 , G. Velasco 4 , J. Benitez 5 ,<br />
C. Rodriguez 6 , M. Calderon 2 , I. Cañamares 7 , H. Cortes-Funes 1 ,<br />
D.E. Castellano 1<br />
1 Servicio De Oncologia Medica, University Hosptial 12 De Octubre Medical<br />
Oncology, Madrid, SPAIN, 2 Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de<br />
Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN, 3 Urology- Urooncology Unit, Hospital Universitario 12<br />
de Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN, 4 Medical Oncology, Hopital 12 de Octubre, Madrid,<br />
SPAIN, 5 Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacogenetics, University of Extremadura<br />
Medical School & Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Badajoz, SPAIN, 6 Biology,<br />
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, SPAIN, 7 Pharmacy,<br />
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN<br />
Background: Sunitinib (SU) is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor<br />
that is approved for <strong>the</strong> treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, several<br />
patients ei<strong>the</strong>r do not respond to treatment or <strong>the</strong>y experience significant toxicity.<br />
Our study aims to find genetic markers of toxicity and efficacy using a commercially<br />
available DNA microarray genotyping system.<br />
Methods: 30 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic RCC, from January 2010 to<br />
May 2011, were evaluated prospectively at Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain).<br />
Pts received SU in repeated 6-wk cycles of 50 mg/day (4 wks on followed by 2 wks<br />
off treatment). A total of 92 of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 34 genes<br />
in <strong>the</strong> pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of drugs were analyzed<br />
Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds399 | ix281