24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annals of Oncology<br />

847P CLINICAL EFFICACY OF SUNITINIB AS POST-OPERATIVE<br />

ADJUVANT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK RENAL<br />

CELL CARCINOMA<br />

X. Zhang 1 , J.Y. Yuan 2 , L. Wang 2 , L. Chen 3 ,J.Pan 4 ,L.Ye 5 , X. Xiao 6 , J. Qiu 7 ,<br />

K. Zhang 8 ,G.Ye 9<br />

1 Urology Department, The General Hospital of <strong>the</strong> People’s Liberation Army,<br />

Beijing, CHINA, 2 Urology Department, Xijin Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Fourth Military Medical<br />

University, Xian, CHINA, 3 Urology Department, 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing,<br />

CHINA, 4 Urology Department, Southwest Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Third Military Medical<br />

University, Chongqing, CHINA, 5 Urology Department, 304 Hospital of PLA,<br />

Beijing, CHINA, 6 Urology Department, General Hospital of Armed Police Forces,<br />

Beijing, CHINA, 7 Urology Department, Bethune International Peace Hospital of<br />

PLA, Jilin, CHINA, 8 Urology Department, Daping Hospital, <strong>the</strong> Third Military<br />

Medical University, Chongqing, CHINA, 9 Urology Department, Xinqiao Hospital,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, CHINA<br />

Objective: To evaluate <strong>the</strong> efficacy and safety of Sunitinib as post-operative adjuvant<br />

<strong>the</strong>rapy in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC).<br />

Methods: A total of 60 patients with resected, histologically confirmed clear cell RCC<br />

were enrolled in this study. Patients received orally Sunitinib ei<strong>the</strong>r at a dose of 50mg<br />

on treatment schedule 4/2 (once daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off) or at a<br />

dose of 37.5mg once daily for three 6-week cycles from 1 month after surgery.<br />

Results: All 60 patients tolerated Sunitinib treatment well and no patient<br />

discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Most adverse events were grade I to II.<br />

The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (56.7%),<br />

thrombocytopenia (53.3%), leucopenia (48.3%), hand-foot syndrome (46.7%) and<br />

hypertension (36.7%). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were<br />

thrombocytopenia (25%), neutropenia (15%), hand-foot syndrome (11.7%) and<br />

leucopenia (8.3%). The majority of adverse events occurred within <strong>the</strong> first 1-2 cycles<br />

of Sunitinib treatment, and was ameliorated 1 month after 3 cycles finished. No<br />

irreversible adverse event was observed. As of April 5, <strong>2012</strong>, no recurrence occurred<br />

in patients except one death due to cerebrovascular accident unrelated to treatment,<br />

with both 6-month and 9-month disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 100%.<br />

Conclusion: Myelosuppression occurred less frequently in high-risk RCC patients<br />

treated with Sunitinib as operative adjuvant <strong>the</strong>rapy than in advanced RCC patients,<br />

with a better benefit trend. However, long-term follow-up data are needed to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

confirm <strong>the</strong> efficacy of Sunitinib in <strong>the</strong> adjuvant setting.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

848P OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL<br />

CARCINOMA (MRCC): A COMPARISON BETWEEN SORAFENIB<br />

(SO) AND BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE (BSC) AFTER FIRST LINE<br />

TREATMENT WITH SUNITINIB (SU) IN SWEDEN<br />

P. Sandström 1 , R. Sandin 2 , J. Kowalski 3 , T. Wahlgren 4 , M. Jakobsson 4 ,<br />

S. Lundstam 5 , B. Ljungberg 6 , U. Harmenberg 1<br />

1 Department of Oncology-pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and<br />

Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SWEDEN, 2 Global Health Economics and<br />

Outcomes Research, Onology, Pfizer AB, Sollentuna, SWEDEN, 3 Department of<br />

Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital<br />

Huddinge and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SWEDEN, 4 Oncology, Pfizer AB,<br />

Sollentuna, SWEDEN, 5 Department of Urology, University Hospital, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Sahlgrenska Academy, Go<strong>the</strong>nburg, SWEDEN, 6 Department of Surgical and<br />

Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå,<br />

SWEDEN<br />

Background: There is a paucity of efficacy data after first line treatment with SU in<br />

mRCC. This retrospective register study compared OS in patients treated with SO<br />

and BSC after first line treatment with SU in Sweden.<br />

Methods: Three Swedish national health registers were used: <strong>the</strong> Swedish Cancer<br />

register (diagnosis and death), <strong>the</strong> National Patient Register (in-/out-patient data),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. 135 patients identified with mRCC,<br />

diagnosed no later than 2009, were recorded as having received 1st-line treatment<br />

with SU; 59 patients received SO and 76 patients received BSC. Multivariate analysis<br />

was performed using <strong>the</strong> Cox proportional hazards model including estimation of<br />

adjusted OS. The regression model included <strong>the</strong> covariates: age, gender,<br />

nephrectomy, time since diagnosis and metastatic disease, time since mRCC<br />

diagnoses and start of systemic <strong>the</strong>rapy, geographical region, institutional size, and<br />

duration of first line SU treatment. Sensitivity analysis with combinations of<br />

explanatory variables, was performed to test <strong>the</strong> robustness of <strong>the</strong> results.<br />

Results: Patients characteristics differed between <strong>the</strong> SO and BSC patients, but<br />

available information did not indicate a clear advantage in favor of any treatment<br />

arm. OS for patients prescribed with SO was improved compared with OS for BSC<br />

patients. Including all covariates, median adjusted OS was 9,9 vs. 6,6 months,<br />

respectively for patients treated with SO and BSC (HR = 0.652, 95% CI: 0.412, 1.030;<br />

P < 0.067). Sensitivity analysis showed a robust and significant reduction in risk of<br />

death for patients treated with SO; range of 29-42% (HR: 0,58-0,71). In all models,<br />

nephrectomy was independently associated with significantly improved OS. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

individual covariates were generally not statistically significant, likely due to a low<br />

number of observations.<br />

Conclusion: An improved OS for mRCC patients was seen in patients receiving<br />

SO compared to BSC after first line treatment with SU. Some caution should be<br />

taken with interpreting <strong>the</strong> results as confounding due to unmeasured covariates<br />

may exist.<br />

Disclosure: P. Sandström: Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, Roche, GSK, Novartis,<br />

and Bayer, has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, bayer, GSK and Novartis and<br />

has received research funding from Pfizer and Bayer. R. Sandin: Rickard Sandin is an<br />

employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock. J. Kowalski: Jan Kowalski is concultant<br />

and received compensation from Pfizer for <strong>the</strong> statistical work for <strong>the</strong> abstract.<br />

T. Wahlgren: Thomas Wahlgren is an employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock.<br />

M. Jakobsson: Maria Jakobsson is an employee of Pfizer AB and owns Pfizer stock.<br />

S. Lundstam: Has had an advisory board role for GSK and Bayer, has received<br />

honoraria from Pfizerand GSK, and has received research funding from Pfizer.<br />

B. Ljungberg: Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, GSK, Novartis, Astellas and Bayer,<br />

and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, GSK and Bayer. U. Harmenberg:<br />

Has had an advisory role for Pfizer, Roche, GSK, Novartis, and Bayer, has received<br />

honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis and has received research funding from<br />

Pfizer, GSK and Novartis.<br />

849P SUNITINIB RECHALLANGE IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL<br />

CARCINOMA PATIENTS<br />

K. Nagyivanyi1 , K. Bíró2 , F. Gyergyay2 , Z. Küronya2 , H. Nemeth2 , L. Géczi2 1<br />

Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy C, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, HUNGARY,<br />

2<br />

Chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy C and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology,<br />

Budapest, HUNGARY<br />

Background: Sunitinib is an active agent in <strong>the</strong> first line treatment of metastatic clear<br />

cell kidney cancer, based on <strong>the</strong> result of a global phase III study. However, complete<br />

remission is rarely seen and multiply sequential <strong>the</strong>rapies are used in this patient<br />

population. Since options in third line setting are limited, we assessed <strong>the</strong> clinical<br />

activity of sunitinib rechallenge after failure on o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>rapies.<br />

Methods: 323 kidney cancer patients were treated with sunitinib from November<br />

2005 to January <strong>2012</strong> in our department. Retrospective data were collected for those<br />

9 patients who we rechallenged with sunitinib failing to at least two previous<br />

<strong>the</strong>rapies, including sunitinib. Patient characteristics, objective response based on<br />

RECIST criteria and progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed. Tumor<br />

assessment was performed every 2nd cycle of sunitinib or every 3 months<br />

Results: Data of 8 men and 1 woman of median age (at sunitinib challenge 59 years,<br />

at sunitinib rechallenge 63 years) with metastatic clear cell cancer of <strong>the</strong> kidney were<br />

analysed. All patients had nephrectomy prior treatment. Initial treatment with<br />

sunitinib was associated with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 13,7<br />

months. Objective response was partial remissions (PR) as best response. At <strong>the</strong> time<br />

of re-exposure patients again showed clinical benefit which was associated with a<br />

median PFS of 6,8 months and consisted of 1 (11%) PR and 5 (55%) disease<br />

stabilizations. PD was seen in 3 (33%) patients.<br />

Conclusions: In sunitinib-responsive patients, re-challenge with sunitinib has been<br />

successful and was well tolerated ei<strong>the</strong>r after an o<strong>the</strong>r TKI or mTOR inhibitor and it<br />

seems to be a valid option as a third line treatment.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

850P GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND SUNITINIB TOXICITY IN<br />

METASTATIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA<br />

J. Sepulveda Sanchez 1 , C. Farfan 2 , F. Villacampa 3 , G. Velasco 4 , J. Benitez 5 ,<br />

C. Rodriguez 6 , M. Calderon 2 , I. Cañamares 7 , H. Cortes-Funes 1 ,<br />

D.E. Castellano 1<br />

1 Servicio De Oncologia Medica, University Hosptial 12 De Octubre Medical<br />

Oncology, Madrid, SPAIN, 2 Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de<br />

Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN, 3 Urology- Urooncology Unit, Hospital Universitario 12<br />

de Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN, 4 Medical Oncology, Hopital 12 de Octubre, Madrid,<br />

SPAIN, 5 Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacogenetics, University of Extremadura<br />

Medical School & Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Badajoz, SPAIN, 6 Biology,<br />

Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, SPAIN, 7 Pharmacy,<br />

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, SPAIN<br />

Background: Sunitinib (SU) is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor<br />

that is approved for <strong>the</strong> treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, several<br />

patients ei<strong>the</strong>r do not respond to treatment or <strong>the</strong>y experience significant toxicity.<br />

Our study aims to find genetic markers of toxicity and efficacy using a commercially<br />

available DNA microarray genotyping system.<br />

Methods: 30 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic RCC, from January 2010 to<br />

May 2011, were evaluated prospectively at Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain).<br />

Pts received SU in repeated 6-wk cycles of 50 mg/day (4 wks on followed by 2 wks<br />

off treatment). A total of 92 of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 34 genes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of drugs were analyzed<br />

Volume 23 | Supplement 9 | September <strong>2012</strong> doi:10.1093/annonc/mds399 | ix281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!