24.12.2012 Views

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

Download the ESMO 2012 Abstract Book - Oxford Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

abstracts<br />

molecular targets in malignant<br />

lymphomas: from basic science<br />

to clinical practice<br />

64IN NEW ANTIBODIES IN THE POST-RITUXIMAB-ERA: ANOTHER<br />

BREAKTHROUGH?<br />

P. Johnson<br />

Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton,<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are one of <strong>the</strong> successes of modern cancer medicine,<br />

with rituximab <strong>the</strong> first to enter widespread clinical application following <strong>the</strong><br />

demonstration of significant activity as a single agent, and superior results when<br />

combined with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy for a variety of CD20+ lymphoma types. In parallel to<br />

extensive clinical studies, we continue to uncover novel aspects of biology of <strong>the</strong><br />

lymphoid cell surface. The molecules to which mAb have been targeted were<br />

identified several decades ago and few new ones have emerged recently, but <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

now increasing interest in effector mechanisms, selective delivery of radionuclides or<br />

toxins, and bispecific molecules to target T- or NK- cells. Once thought of as a<br />

comparatively inert component of <strong>the</strong> cell membrane, CD20 is in fact a dynamic<br />

molecule. It can undergo rapid redistribution, and different mAb cause different<br />

effects: those like Rituximab (“type I”) elicit redistribution into lipid-rich rafts,<br />

mediate complement fixation and antibody-directed cell-mediated cytotoxicity<br />

(ADCC). In contrast, those like <strong>the</strong> first anti-B-cell mAb characterised, B1 (“type II”)<br />

do not cause redistribution into rafts but mediate homotypic cell adhesion and<br />

programmed cell death. These differences have important <strong>the</strong>rapeutic results, and we<br />

have found that in lymphomas expressing <strong>the</strong> CD32 antigen (Fcgamma-R2b), type<br />

ImAb mediate rapid internalization of CD20 with lysosomal consumption, while<br />

type II do not. This has potential consequences for <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapeutic effect, as does <strong>the</strong><br />

avidity with which mAb with different sugar groups bind to various Fc receptors. As<br />

well as radioconjugates, we are also returning to previously discarded approaches<br />

such as immunotxins, which have benefitted from advances in linker chemistry to<br />

improve <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>rapeutic ratio. Problems of toxin liberation and systemic toxicity<br />

have been largely overcome, and a new generation of conjugates is finding<br />

application in lymphoma <strong>the</strong>rapy. Finally, <strong>the</strong> capacity to generate bispecific<br />

constructs that allow targeting of T-cells to <strong>the</strong> malignant cell surface holds <strong>the</strong><br />

promise of harnessing cellular as well as humoral immunity. The initial promise of<br />

antibody <strong>the</strong>rapy for lymphoma is already being fulfilled, and <strong>the</strong> next generation of<br />

compounds holds exciting challenges and great potential.<br />

Disclosure: P. Johnson: Advisory Boards for Pfizer, Millenium Takeda, Roche,<br />

Boehringer Ingelheim. Research funding from Janssen-Cilag.<br />

65IN MTOR INHIBITORS AND BEYOND: TARGETING A CRITICAL<br />

PATHWAY<br />

M.H. Dreyling<br />

Department of Medicine Iii, University of Munich, Munich, GERMANY<br />

Upregulation of <strong>the</strong> PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway has been detected in<br />

numerous lymphoma subtypes including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Accordingly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus has been registered in EU based on a prospective<br />

randomized trial in 162 patients with relapsed MCL. In comparison to<br />

monochemo<strong>the</strong>rapy, Temsirolimus achieved significantly higher response rates (22%<br />

vs 2%) and longer progression-free survival (4.8 vs. 1.9 months). Moreover, <strong>the</strong><br />

efficacy of <strong>the</strong> mTOR inhibitor was confirmed not only in MCL, but also follicular<br />

and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in numerous phase II studies. Based on in vitro<br />

studies current trials investigate <strong>the</strong> combination with chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy. Thus, all 12<br />

initial patients with relapsed MCL responded to a<br />

Bendamustin-Rituximab-Temsirolimus combination (BeRT). Recent research has<br />

confirmed <strong>the</strong> critical role of <strong>the</strong> B-cell receptor pathway upstream of mTOR in <strong>the</strong><br />

molecular pathogenesis of malignant lymphoma. This pathway represents <strong>the</strong><br />

physiological survival signal for maturating lymphocytes in <strong>the</strong> germinal center.<br />

Accordingly, small molecules attacking this pathway displayed high efficacy in<br />

various lymphoma subtypes even in mono<strong>the</strong>rapy. Thus, a SYK inhibitor has been<br />

shown to be effective in patients with relapsed diffuse large cell lymphoma. Especially<br />

both, an inhibitor of <strong>the</strong> PI3K delta isoform (GS-1101, formally Cal-101) only<br />

expressed in lymphoid cells and <strong>the</strong> BTK inhibitor ibrutinib showed high efficacy in<br />

relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (response rate about 70%) as well as CLL (response<br />

Annals of Oncology 23 (Supplement 9): ix44–ix45, <strong>2012</strong><br />

doi:10.1093/annonc/mds382<br />

rate between 70–90% in relapsed or previously untreated disease). In contrast,<br />

response rates were lower in follicular lymphoma presumely indicating <strong>the</strong> different<br />

survival signal of <strong>the</strong> constitutive BCL-2 overexpression in this lymphoma subtype.<br />

These data also confirm <strong>the</strong> crucial role of <strong>the</strong> micromilieu in lymphoid diseases<br />

which are hampered by <strong>the</strong> inhibition of <strong>the</strong> B-cell receptor pathway. Finally, recent<br />

in vitro data suggest some synergism of different members of <strong>the</strong> B-cell receptor<br />

pathway in combination with mTOR inhibition. Such molecular targeted strategies<br />

have <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> potential to become part of <strong>the</strong> new treatment strategies in a broad<br />

spectrum of lymphoid neoplasias.<br />

Disclosure: M.H. Dreyling: Pfizer (Temsirolimus): scientific advisory board, speaker\<br />

\\’s honoraria Janssen (Ibrutinib): scientific advisory board, support of IITs, speaker\\<br />

\’s honoraria<br />

66IN PROTEASOME INHIBITORS: REALLY A TARGETED THERAPY?<br />

D. Colomer 1 , P. Perez-Galan 2 , G. Roué 2<br />

1 Hematopathology Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d’ Investigacions Biomèdiques<br />

August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, SPAIN, 2 Hematology-oncology. Cek,<br />

Institut d’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona,<br />

SPAIN<br />

Bortezomib is <strong>the</strong> first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that targets <strong>the</strong> critical process<br />

of intracellular protein modification and degradation. In 2006, bortezomib was<br />

approved for <strong>the</strong> treatment of relapsed or refractory MCL. The mechanisms of<br />

proteasome inhibition are very complex as <strong>the</strong>y affect many pathways. The Initial<br />

rationale for bortezomib use was inhibition of NF-kB activity. However, bortezomib<br />

does not block constitutive NF-kB activity in MCL and induces oxidative and<br />

endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. This cellular stress leads to <strong>the</strong> activation of a<br />

cytoprotective response called Unfolded Protein Response (UPR), that tries to aliviate<br />

ER stress and rescue <strong>the</strong> cell by different adaptive mechanisms. However under<br />

conditions of prolonged stress, apoptosis is activated. Apoptosis commitment starts<br />

with <strong>the</strong> transcriptional activation of <strong>the</strong> propapoptotic BH3-only protein Noxa,<br />

leading to mitochondrial apoptosis. However, half of MCL cases fail to respond, and<br />

resistance often appears after initial treatment. By gene expression analysis it has<br />

been reported that MCL bortezomib-resistant cell lines showed partial plasmacytic<br />

differentiation, including increased expression of IRF4 and its target genes, and of <strong>the</strong><br />

cell-surface markers CD38 and CD138. Tumors from patients with inferior clinical<br />

responses to bortezomib also had high IRF4 and CD38 expression, identifying<br />

possible clinical markers of bortezomib resistance. Also, a correlation between loss of<br />

sensitivity to bortezomib and up-regulation of <strong>the</strong> prosurvival chaperone BiP/Grp78<br />

controlling ER homeostasis has been observed. BiP/Grp78 forms a large multiprotein<br />

complex with o<strong>the</strong>r ER molecular chaperones, including HSP90. Combination of<br />

bortezomib with IPI-504, a HSP90 inhibitor that displace <strong>the</strong> client proteins and<br />

target <strong>the</strong>m for destruction by <strong>the</strong> proteasome system, prevented BiP/Grp78<br />

accumulation, <strong>the</strong>reby promoting apoptosis and inhibiting <strong>the</strong> growth of<br />

bortezomib-resistant tumor xenotransplants. In summary, targeting <strong>the</strong><br />

ubiquitin-proteasome pathway with bortezomib represents a potent arsenal in <strong>the</strong><br />

treatment of MCL, although we need to find new combinations and specific<br />

biomarkers that may help us to recognize which cases will be benefit from each<br />

specific treatment.<br />

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br />

67IN IMIDS: MULTIPLE PATHWAYS BUT DOES IT REALLY WORK?<br />

G. Morgan, C. Pawlyn, F. Davies<br />

Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London,<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

The mechanism of action of IMiD® compounds has been <strong>the</strong> subject of much recent<br />

research which has highlighted <strong>the</strong> dual effects of <strong>the</strong>se drugs, with both direct<br />

tumoricidal effects and immunomodulatory activity. Lenalidomide exerts its<br />

tumoricidal effects through a number of mechanisms, including decreased<br />

production of cytokine and growth factors causing disruption of stromal support,<br />

induction of tumor suppressor genes leading to cell cycle arrest and activation of<br />

caspases triggering tumor cell apoptosis. A recent study showed that IMiD®<br />

compounds increase p21 expression by a novel epigenetic mechanism. Lenalidomide<br />

also provides sustained disease control by improving immune function, resulting in<br />

continued tumour killing. Lenalidomide exerts immunomodulatory effects via<br />

enhanced antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell cytolysis and by increasing natural killer<br />

(NK)-cell expression of death effector molecules. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide<br />

have greater tumoricidal effects than thalidomide. Lenalidomide also has a more<br />

potent effect on <strong>the</strong> immune system. Both thalidomide and pomalidomide have<br />

© European Society for Medical Oncology <strong>2012</strong>. Published by <strong>Oxford</strong> University Press on behalf of <strong>the</strong> European Society for Medical Oncology.<br />

All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!