vgbe energy journal 7 (2022) - International Journal for Generation and Storage of Electricity and Heat
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Emission footprint analysis <strong>of</strong> dispatchable gas-based power generation technologies<br />
Emissions in<br />
0ppmvd @ 15 % O 2<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
An efficiency characteristic is needed to convert<br />
the full-load emission values to the selected<br />
apples-to-apples metric, i.e., mg/<br />
kWh el , over the entire load range. The underlying<br />
efficiency characteristic used in the present<br />
study was derived by combining available<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation from gas turbine manufacturers<br />
[17] <strong>and</strong> scientific literature [18], [19].<br />
As a result, the NO X emission part-load characteristic<br />
can be converted into the applesto-apples<br />
metric. F i g u r e 7 shows the exemplary<br />
results <strong>for</strong> a SC-GT with an emission<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 15 ppmvd @ 15 vol.% O 2 <strong>and</strong><br />
electrical efficiency <strong>of</strong> 39 % at full load [20],<br />
which equals 236 mg/kWh el . It should be<br />
noted that F i g u r e 7 depicts the emission<br />
behavior <strong>of</strong> the gas turbine over the entire<br />
load range, including load points below the<br />
minimum environmental load. At loads below<br />
the MEL, emissions are no longer in<br />
compliance with the legislation. Thus, operation<br />
over extended periods is not permissible<br />
at loads below the MEL.<br />
While data on NO X emissions must be reported<br />
to the EPA, reporting <strong>of</strong> other pollutantssuch<br />
as CO or UHC emissions is not m<strong>and</strong>atory.<br />
Since no other turbine data source<br />
could be identified, a plausible part load CO<br />
& UHC emission characteristic was derived<br />
from the scientific literature [15], [21], [22].<br />
The following trends are expected <strong>for</strong> CO:<br />
––<br />
Very low emissions at full load due to<br />
complete combustion<br />
––<br />
Constant, low emissions at load reduction<br />
until a particular load point (<strong>for</strong> CO typically<br />
20-50 % <strong>of</strong> nominal load, <strong>for</strong> UHC<br />
typically ~10-20 %-points lower as <strong>for</strong> CO)<br />
Power in %<br />
Fig. 6. Load-dependent GT NO X emissions in ppmvd.<br />
Emission in mg kWh el<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
regulated by<br />
local<br />
authority<br />
Power in %<br />
Fig. 7. Load-dependent GT NO X , CO, <strong>and</strong> UHC emissions in [mg/kWh el ].<br />
NOx<br />
CO el = 39 %<br />
UHC<br />
13. BlmSchV (NOx)<br />
13. BlmSchV (CO)<br />
regulated by<br />
13. BlmSchV<br />
0<br />
0 25 50 75 100<br />
––<br />
Rapid <strong>and</strong> exponential increase towards<br />
lower loads when diffusion-type pilot burners<br />
are activated <strong>for</strong> flame stabilization<br />
The expected results were used to benchmark<br />
the derived CO part-load characteristics.<br />
For UHC the same trend as <strong>for</strong> CO emissions<br />
was assumed but shifted 10 %-points<br />
towards the lower load in compliance with<br />
the underlying scientific literature [15],<br />
[21], [22]. The resulting trend curves parametrized<br />
<strong>for</strong> CO <strong>and</strong> UHC emissions are displayed<br />
in F i g u r e 7. The corresponding<br />
full-load emission values are 19 mg/kWh el<br />
<strong>for</strong> CO (2 ppmvd @ 15 vol.% O 2 ) <strong>and</strong><br />
33 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> UHC (TOC as C 3 H 8 ; 2 ppmvd<br />
@ 15 vol.% O 2 ) based on an electrical<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> 39 %. Additionally, the 13 th<br />
BImSchV emission limits are displayed corrected<br />
with the underlying part load efficiency<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> a SC-GT.<br />
For the present study, a somewhat optimistic<br />
starting point (at 20 % relative load) <strong>for</strong><br />
the CO emission increase was chosen to represent<br />
state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art gas turbines <strong>and</strong> comply<br />
with the underlying scientific literature.<br />
However, it should be mentioned that the<br />
individual starting point varies manufacturer-<br />
<strong>and</strong> engine-dependent.<br />
For <strong>for</strong>maldehyde <strong>and</strong> PM emissions, loaddependent<br />
part-load characteristics could<br />
not be found in the publicly available literature.<br />
Primarily, investigations on <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />
emissions from gas turbine engines are<br />
very scarce. This may be attributed to <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />
emissions being typically very<br />
low [21], although they account <strong>for</strong> the<br />
highest share <strong>of</strong> hazardous air pollutants<br />
(HAP) [23]. Formaldehyde <strong>for</strong>ms as an early<br />
intermittent species <strong>of</strong> methane oxidation<br />
[24]. Thus, very low <strong>for</strong>maldehyde emissions<br />
are expected under complete combustion<br />
conditions, although a similar trend to<br />
CO can be anticipated towards very low<br />
loads [25]. However, no detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
on the <strong>for</strong>mation process <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />
<strong>for</strong> reduced loads was found in the<br />
available literature. As a result, <strong>for</strong> the present<br />
study, <strong>for</strong>maldehyde emissions were<br />
accounted <strong>for</strong> by a constant value over the<br />
entire load range (3 mg/mN 3 [23], i.e.,<br />
23 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> an electrical efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
39 %). Since the available literature data is<br />
not sufficient to model PM with satisfactory<br />
accuracy, an averaged value over the entire<br />
load range was assumed (1 mg/mN 3 [26],<br />
i.e., 8 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> an electrical efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> 39 %). This should be a conservative estimation<br />
since PM emissions from gas turbines<br />
are generally very low [27]. The corresponding<br />
part load trend curves <strong>for</strong> both<br />
PM <strong>and</strong> HCHO emissions are subsequently<br />
derived by the application <strong>of</strong> the part-load<br />
efficiency characteristic <strong>of</strong> a SC-GT.<br />
3 Modeling approach <strong>for</strong> the<br />
gas-based power plants<br />
This section explains the underlying modeling<br />
approach <strong>for</strong> aggregating individual<br />
RICE or GTs into a power plant configuration,<br />
the plant operation <strong>for</strong> a given load<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile, <strong>and</strong> the corresponding emission calculation.<br />
For this purpose, an EXCEL-based<br />
model framework was developed.<br />
To highlight the different modes <strong>of</strong> operation<br />
<strong>of</strong> gas-based power generation plants,<br />
an exemplary “peaking” scenario <strong>and</strong> an exemplary<br />
“baseload” scenario are examined<br />
in detail. The two scenarios differ in power<br />
plant configuration. The peaking scenario<br />
comprises plant configurations that feature<br />
multiple <strong>and</strong> rapid startups <strong>and</strong> shutdowns<br />
as well as transient operations. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
one SC-GT <strong>and</strong> the corresponding number<br />
<strong>of</strong> about 10 MW el RICE to reach the same<br />
power output represent the plant configuration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the peaking scenario. In contrast, the<br />
baseload scenario features plant configurations<br />
that focus on efficient power generation<br />
close to full-load operation. Consequently,<br />
a CC-GT <strong>and</strong> the corresponding<br />
number <strong>of</strong> about 20 MW el RICE to reach the<br />
same power output represent the plant configurations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the baseload scenario. The<br />
corresponding load pr<strong>of</strong>iles used <strong>for</strong> each<br />
scenario are derived from publicly available<br />
actual plant operation pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> a CC-GT<br />
power plant located in Germany 11 [37].<br />
Since the real load pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> an aggregated<br />
RICE power plant may exceed the transient<br />
capabilities <strong>of</strong> conventional GTs, a load pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
was chosen that both technologies can<br />
be operated with. In the case <strong>of</strong> high tran-<br />
11<br />
The load pr<strong>of</strong>iles used are originally from the<br />
600 MW CC-GT power plant Lausward in Germany.<br />
<strong>vgbe</strong> <strong>energy</strong> <strong>journal</strong> 7 · <strong>2022</strong> | 37