11.11.2022 Views

vgbe energy journal 7 (2022) - International Journal for Generation and Storage of Electricity and Heat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Emission footprint analysis <strong>of</strong> dispatchable gas-based power generation technologies<br />

Emissions in<br />

0ppmvd @ 15 % O 2<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

An efficiency characteristic is needed to convert<br />

the full-load emission values to the selected<br />

apples-to-apples metric, i.e., mg/<br />

kWh el , over the entire load range. The underlying<br />

efficiency characteristic used in the present<br />

study was derived by combining available<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation from gas turbine manufacturers<br />

[17] <strong>and</strong> scientific literature [18], [19].<br />

As a result, the NO X emission part-load characteristic<br />

can be converted into the applesto-apples<br />

metric. F i g u r e 7 shows the exemplary<br />

results <strong>for</strong> a SC-GT with an emission<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 15 ppmvd @ 15 vol.% O 2 <strong>and</strong><br />

electrical efficiency <strong>of</strong> 39 % at full load [20],<br />

which equals 236 mg/kWh el . It should be<br />

noted that F i g u r e 7 depicts the emission<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> the gas turbine over the entire<br />

load range, including load points below the<br />

minimum environmental load. At loads below<br />

the MEL, emissions are no longer in<br />

compliance with the legislation. Thus, operation<br />

over extended periods is not permissible<br />

at loads below the MEL.<br />

While data on NO X emissions must be reported<br />

to the EPA, reporting <strong>of</strong> other pollutantssuch<br />

as CO or UHC emissions is not m<strong>and</strong>atory.<br />

Since no other turbine data source<br />

could be identified, a plausible part load CO<br />

& UHC emission characteristic was derived<br />

from the scientific literature [15], [21], [22].<br />

The following trends are expected <strong>for</strong> CO:<br />

––<br />

Very low emissions at full load due to<br />

complete combustion<br />

––<br />

Constant, low emissions at load reduction<br />

until a particular load point (<strong>for</strong> CO typically<br />

20-50 % <strong>of</strong> nominal load, <strong>for</strong> UHC<br />

typically ~10-20 %-points lower as <strong>for</strong> CO)<br />

Power in %<br />

Fig. 6. Load-dependent GT NO X emissions in ppmvd.<br />

Emission in mg kWh el<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

regulated by<br />

local<br />

authority<br />

Power in %<br />

Fig. 7. Load-dependent GT NO X , CO, <strong>and</strong> UHC emissions in [mg/kWh el ].<br />

NOx<br />

CO el = 39 %<br />

UHC<br />

13. BlmSchV (NOx)<br />

13. BlmSchV (CO)<br />

regulated by<br />

13. BlmSchV<br />

0<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

––<br />

Rapid <strong>and</strong> exponential increase towards<br />

lower loads when diffusion-type pilot burners<br />

are activated <strong>for</strong> flame stabilization<br />

The expected results were used to benchmark<br />

the derived CO part-load characteristics.<br />

For UHC the same trend as <strong>for</strong> CO emissions<br />

was assumed but shifted 10 %-points<br />

towards the lower load in compliance with<br />

the underlying scientific literature [15],<br />

[21], [22]. The resulting trend curves parametrized<br />

<strong>for</strong> CO <strong>and</strong> UHC emissions are displayed<br />

in F i g u r e 7. The corresponding<br />

full-load emission values are 19 mg/kWh el<br />

<strong>for</strong> CO (2 ppmvd @ 15 vol.% O 2 ) <strong>and</strong><br />

33 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> UHC (TOC as C 3 H 8 ; 2 ppmvd<br />

@ 15 vol.% O 2 ) based on an electrical<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> 39 %. Additionally, the 13 th<br />

BImSchV emission limits are displayed corrected<br />

with the underlying part load efficiency<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> a SC-GT.<br />

For the present study, a somewhat optimistic<br />

starting point (at 20 % relative load) <strong>for</strong><br />

the CO emission increase was chosen to represent<br />

state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art gas turbines <strong>and</strong> comply<br />

with the underlying scientific literature.<br />

However, it should be mentioned that the<br />

individual starting point varies manufacturer-<br />

<strong>and</strong> engine-dependent.<br />

For <strong>for</strong>maldehyde <strong>and</strong> PM emissions, loaddependent<br />

part-load characteristics could<br />

not be found in the publicly available literature.<br />

Primarily, investigations on <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />

emissions from gas turbine engines are<br />

very scarce. This may be attributed to <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />

emissions being typically very<br />

low [21], although they account <strong>for</strong> the<br />

highest share <strong>of</strong> hazardous air pollutants<br />

(HAP) [23]. Formaldehyde <strong>for</strong>ms as an early<br />

intermittent species <strong>of</strong> methane oxidation<br />

[24]. Thus, very low <strong>for</strong>maldehyde emissions<br />

are expected under complete combustion<br />

conditions, although a similar trend to<br />

CO can be anticipated towards very low<br />

loads [25]. However, no detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on the <strong>for</strong>mation process <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />

<strong>for</strong> reduced loads was found in the<br />

available literature. As a result, <strong>for</strong> the present<br />

study, <strong>for</strong>maldehyde emissions were<br />

accounted <strong>for</strong> by a constant value over the<br />

entire load range (3 mg/mN 3 [23], i.e.,<br />

23 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> an electrical efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

39 %). Since the available literature data is<br />

not sufficient to model PM with satisfactory<br />

accuracy, an averaged value over the entire<br />

load range was assumed (1 mg/mN 3 [26],<br />

i.e., 8 mg/kWh el <strong>for</strong> an electrical efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> 39 %). This should be a conservative estimation<br />

since PM emissions from gas turbines<br />

are generally very low [27]. The corresponding<br />

part load trend curves <strong>for</strong> both<br />

PM <strong>and</strong> HCHO emissions are subsequently<br />

derived by the application <strong>of</strong> the part-load<br />

efficiency characteristic <strong>of</strong> a SC-GT.<br />

3 Modeling approach <strong>for</strong> the<br />

gas-based power plants<br />

This section explains the underlying modeling<br />

approach <strong>for</strong> aggregating individual<br />

RICE or GTs into a power plant configuration,<br />

the plant operation <strong>for</strong> a given load<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile, <strong>and</strong> the corresponding emission calculation.<br />

For this purpose, an EXCEL-based<br />

model framework was developed.<br />

To highlight the different modes <strong>of</strong> operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> gas-based power generation plants,<br />

an exemplary “peaking” scenario <strong>and</strong> an exemplary<br />

“baseload” scenario are examined<br />

in detail. The two scenarios differ in power<br />

plant configuration. The peaking scenario<br />

comprises plant configurations that feature<br />

multiple <strong>and</strong> rapid startups <strong>and</strong> shutdowns<br />

as well as transient operations. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

one SC-GT <strong>and</strong> the corresponding number<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 10 MW el RICE to reach the same<br />

power output represent the plant configuration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the peaking scenario. In contrast, the<br />

baseload scenario features plant configurations<br />

that focus on efficient power generation<br />

close to full-load operation. Consequently,<br />

a CC-GT <strong>and</strong> the corresponding<br />

number <strong>of</strong> about 20 MW el RICE to reach the<br />

same power output represent the plant configurations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the baseload scenario. The<br />

corresponding load pr<strong>of</strong>iles used <strong>for</strong> each<br />

scenario are derived from publicly available<br />

actual plant operation pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> a CC-GT<br />

power plant located in Germany 11 [37].<br />

Since the real load pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> an aggregated<br />

RICE power plant may exceed the transient<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> conventional GTs, a load pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

was chosen that both technologies can<br />

be operated with. In the case <strong>of</strong> high tran-<br />

11<br />

The load pr<strong>of</strong>iles used are originally from the<br />

600 MW CC-GT power plant Lausward in Germany.<br />

<strong>vgbe</strong> <strong>energy</strong> <strong>journal</strong> 7 · <strong>2022</strong> | 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!