14.01.2013 Views

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State of the World’s Cities <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>2013</strong><br />

Box 3.2.1<br />

Measuring Innovation and Creativity<br />

In 2000 a “Creative City Index” was developed to measure<br />

‘the imaginative pulse of cities’, combining a variety of<br />

indicators ranging from political and public frameworks,<br />

diversity, vitality and expression, openness and tolerance,<br />

entrepreneurship, vision, liveability, learning and<br />

professionalism, among 10 specific dimensions. In 2007,<br />

Melbourne-based “2thinkNow” developed an “Innovation<br />

Cities Program” along with an “Innovation Cities Index” in a<br />

bid to enhance understanding of the links between innovation<br />

and the way cities operate. The measure also uses a large<br />

variety of indicators, involving cultural assets, infrastructure<br />

and networked markets in areas such as commerce, finance,<br />

food, the arts, health, technology, religion, the media, etc.<br />

On this basis, cities are classified in five categories: ‘nexus’<br />

(cities featuring critical innovations),’hub’ (cities that are<br />

influential in key areas), ‘node’ (cities combining broadranging<br />

performance and imbalances), ‘influencer’ (cities that<br />

are competitive but unbalanced on the whole), and ‘upstart’<br />

(cities with potential for future performance).<br />

Source: UN-Habitat (<strong>2012</strong>) Decentralization in Iraq: Challenges and<br />

Solutions for Federal and Local Governments, Nairobi: UN-Habitat<br />

POLICy<br />

A creative city must establish a balance between<br />

‘hardware’ factors – infrastructure and technology –<br />

and ‘software’ factors (including mind-set, dynamics of place, the<br />

connection between thinkers and doers, and a change-friendly<br />

environment). 7<br />

<strong>THE</strong> FACTORS BEHIND URBAN INNOvATIvENESS<br />

Innovation can emanate from a creative worker, a<br />

community leader, a business person, an artist, a public<br />

servant or a scientist, etc. Innovation can respond to a<br />

specific problem, reduce risks, anticipate challenges, result<br />

in new products or process, or harness existing or emerging<br />

opportunities. For the purposes of urban prosperity,<br />

innovation has a clear role in improved conditions for<br />

populations and the way they live, work, move, relax and<br />

more generally make the most of the urban advantage.<br />

If its existing<br />

creative capital is to be<br />

POLICy<br />

The culture of<br />

creativity must<br />

be embedded in the way<br />

cities operate. 8<br />

enhanced, or activated<br />

where dormant, a city<br />

should become a locus<br />

where sociocultural<br />

diversity can be staged,<br />

104<br />

and where links can flourish among both individuals and<br />

institutions. In practice, all of this requires well-adapted<br />

physical environments, which in turn have to do with<br />

urbanization economies9 and better urban planning. From<br />

a more institutional point of view, support to knowledge<br />

exchange and networking is another way of stimulating<br />

creative capital, along with favourable conditions for<br />

research and development. As for the productive sector,<br />

creative stimulation can also derive from economies of<br />

agglomeration and an entrepreneur-friendly environment.<br />

It may come as no surprise that in Asia, most<br />

local experts saw a strong link between research and<br />

development (R&D), on the one hand, and enhanced<br />

prosperity on the other, with public authorities and other<br />

stakeholders playing significant roles in the areas of<br />

business, industry and technology.<br />

This was the case in Singapore, Hyderabad and<br />

Bangalore (India), Shenzhen and Chongqing (China),<br />

Gaziantep (Turkey) and Cebu (the Philippines). In<br />

Singapore, gross expenditure on R&D increased from<br />

1.9 per cent in 1990 to 2.8 per cent 2008 and three<br />

per cent in 201010 , with the focus on applied research,<br />

technology, sustainable urban living and ‘clean’ energy. 11<br />

In Bangalore, the emergence of the city as a knowledge<br />

hub is a visible impact of policy, entrepreneurship and<br />

innovation. With more than 66 engineering colleges and<br />

55 polytechnics, the city has developed as a centre for<br />

scientific innovation, research in aeronautics and electronics<br />

with strong public research facilities. 12 Biotechnologies<br />

and computer/communications also feature highly in<br />

Hyderabad, India’s pharmaceutical capital, with support<br />

from central government and more than 40 research<br />

and educational institutions. 13 Shenzhen has developed<br />

an endogenous innovation strategy led by the state with<br />

investments from government agencies, industries and<br />

universities. In few years,<br />

the city has developed a<br />

high-tech, modern service<br />

industry, actively promoting FACT industrial transformation<br />

and upgrade, focusing<br />

on electronics, biological<br />

engineering and new<br />

material technology.<br />

The city has also made<br />

important innovations<br />

in the service industry<br />

(finance, logistics and<br />

UN-Habitat<br />

survey shows<br />

that five main factors<br />

are at play when cities<br />

innovate: innovative<br />

urban management,<br />

entrepreneurial capacity,<br />

the promotion of<br />

arts and culture, the<br />

emergence of industrial<br />

clusters, and research<br />

and development (R&D).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!