14.01.2013 Views

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Treating Quality of Life as a By-product<br />

UN-Habitat survey results show that the more committed<br />

the city is to promote quality of life, the more the chances<br />

that the effects will be broad-ranging. There is a clear<br />

positive association between a high degree of commitment<br />

to address quality of life and the possibility of designing<br />

specific policies. Unfortunately, the opposite also applies,<br />

and many cities treat quality of life as a by-product or an<br />

‘after-effect’ of policy interventions. Even where some cities<br />

perform well under other dimensions of prosperity, they<br />

fail to deliver better quality of life. Abidjan, Dakar, Dar<br />

es Salam and Kampala illustrate well this situation: they<br />

feature moderate or weak values in the “City <strong>Prosperity</strong><br />

Index”, but rank even much lower for quality of life, which<br />

goes to show that this dimension cannot be considered as an<br />

indirect component of any urban policy agenda.<br />

A number of studies have shown that the various<br />

determinants of quality of life generate complex interactions<br />

and diverse causal relations. Sometimes, efforts to promote<br />

one element can have unexpected detrimental effects<br />

on other elements; for example, prioritizing economic<br />

growth per se can result in negative environmental<br />

impacts. In other cases, positive linkages between<br />

these determinants are quite obvious; for instance, the<br />

provision of green open spaces brings health benefits to<br />

the population. In some other cases, the relationship can<br />

be less evident; for example, individual housing choices<br />

may have environmental impacts that affect quality of<br />

life in different ways. 10 All too often, cities do not clearly<br />

perceive the complexity of these interactions and assume<br />

that interrelations will always be positive. Several cities<br />

in Asia and the Arab States that are experiencing high<br />

economic growth are mostly focusing on infrastructure<br />

development in the pursuit<br />

POLICy Cities<br />

that focus<br />

only on economic<br />

development and<br />

provide services that<br />

are not public goods,<br />

may leave the urban<br />

poor, migrants, ethnic<br />

minorities and other<br />

vulnerable groups with<br />

serious difficulties to<br />

pay for the improved<br />

services, reducing the<br />

possibilities for them to<br />

enjoy quality of life.<br />

of higher productivity and<br />

therefore higher incomes,<br />

assuming that this will lead<br />

to better quality of life in<br />

the long term. Generally,<br />

that is what happens,<br />

since economic growth<br />

increases purchasing power<br />

and demand for goods<br />

and services including<br />

education, entertainment,<br />

financial services and<br />

housing, which, in turn,<br />

not only create new<br />

61<br />

Quality of Life and Urban <strong>Prosperity</strong><br />

employment opportunities<br />

but also contribute to<br />

higher quality of life. But<br />

there may also be negative<br />

consequences.<br />

However, UN-Habitat<br />

policy analysis shows that<br />

most surveyed cities in the<br />

developing world have<br />

no clear policies, actions<br />

and reliable procedures<br />

to deliver and expand<br />

quality of life to the whole<br />

population. With the<br />

exceptions of Singapore,<br />

Davao, Ho Chi Minh<br />

City and Chon Qing in<br />

Asia, Fort-de-France and<br />

Medellín in Latin America<br />

and the Caribbean, and<br />

Doha in the Arab States<br />

(whose commitment to<br />

quality of life was highly<br />

commended), experts<br />

took a critical view of the<br />

42 other cities on that<br />

count. They found public<br />

administrations to be<br />

generally inefficient and<br />

with poor incentives to<br />

devise specific quality of<br />

life policies for lack of adequate financial resources, trained<br />

staff or political interest.<br />

Positive exceptions can be found, such as Cebu,<br />

Singapore, Dubai, and Ho Chi Minh City, where, in the<br />

words of a local expert, “investing in human resources is<br />

considered to be the best way of seizing more opportunities<br />

and turning them into wealth and quality of life to make the<br />

city more prosperous”. 11 Social equity<br />

FACT and quality of<br />

life go hand in hand. In<br />

practice, though, any<br />

policies and actions<br />

aiming to expand<br />

societal well-being<br />

largely depend on<br />

the political will of<br />

governments and the<br />

degree of participation<br />

of civil society<br />

organizations and, in<br />

particular, their degree<br />

of autonomy when it<br />

comes to advocating,<br />

upholding and fighting<br />

for the rights of all.<br />

When a city<br />

POLICy focuses solely<br />

on economic prosperity, it is<br />

very likely that the benefits<br />

and improvements in terms<br />

of quality of life may not be<br />

geared to the urban poor,<br />

particularly in those cities<br />

where corruption and poor<br />

governance are endemic.<br />

In Cebu, a local expert argues that<br />

“it is not only a matter of expanding the pie (i.e., economic<br />

FACT<br />

Experts in 60 per cent of surveyed cities in Africa<br />

and Arab States and slightly more than 40 per cent<br />

of cities in Asia and Latin America believe that corruption and<br />

poor governance conspire against local prosperity and quality<br />

of life.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!