STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity
STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity
STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
State of the World’s Cities <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>2013</strong><br />
FACT<br />
In some African cities, a large majority of local<br />
experts report that although economic developed and<br />
related urban activities have detrimental effects on the natural<br />
environment, sustainability is largely overlooked by policy-makers.<br />
given that these cities are<br />
among those pursuing<br />
environmental sustainability<br />
as a matter of policy.<br />
South Africa’s<br />
economic capital has been<br />
systematically promoting<br />
creation and preservation<br />
of open spaces, pursuing energy efficiency and the reduction<br />
of greenhouse gases, and promoting solar energy, energysaving<br />
bulbs and insulation as part of a retrofitting scheme.<br />
Above all, the city promotes sustainable building design<br />
and construction through a comprehensive set of planning<br />
regulations, whereby a sustainable approach must pervade all<br />
planning stages. 14<br />
POLICy Johannesburg’s<br />
approach to<br />
environmental sustainability<br />
appears to be the most<br />
comprehensive of all African<br />
cities.<br />
FACT<br />
Apart from cities<br />
in the Arab States,<br />
economic development and<br />
urban activities in Asian<br />
cities are perceived to have<br />
the least detrimental effects<br />
on the natural environment.<br />
POLICy<br />
When cities<br />
promote<br />
environmental sustainability<br />
as a matter of policy,<br />
they are able to cushion<br />
the unintended effects of<br />
economic development<br />
and urban activities.<br />
Environmentally sustainable<br />
cities are, almost by<br />
definition, more compact,<br />
energy-efficient, clean<br />
and less polluted, more<br />
accessible, and offer better<br />
transport choices<br />
Figure 2.5.2<br />
Environmental Impact of Growth* – Asian Cities<br />
per cent<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Ho Chi<br />
Minh City<br />
Bangalore<br />
Lahore<br />
80<br />
ASIAN <strong>CITIES</strong><br />
However, the expert opinion survey reveals differences<br />
across cities. For instance, economic growth is not<br />
perceived to have been matched by adequate infrastructure<br />
and services in Ho Chi Minh City, Bangalore, Lahore, and<br />
Hyderabad. In Lahore, experts point to ground water<br />
pollution, extensive air pollution, traffic congestion and<br />
urban sprawl as major effects of economic development and<br />
urban activities on the environment, these are compounded<br />
by inadequate capacity and weak institutions. 15 Similarly<br />
in Bangalore, experts point to poor air quality, depletion<br />
of ground water tables and fast receding lakes. 16 These<br />
perceptions contrast with those of local experts in<br />
Singapore, Turkey’s Gaziantep, and Shenzhen, where very<br />
few local experts view economic growth and urban activities<br />
as detrimental to the environment (Figure 2.5.2).<br />
In Asia, close to two-thirds of local experts report<br />
that this type of policy is at work in their respective cities,<br />
especially in Singapore and Ho Chi Minh City. Singapore<br />
is fully committed to environmental sustainability. This<br />
includes environmental awareness campaigns, with<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Davao<br />
* As perceived by local experts surveyed by UN-Habitat<br />
Source: UN-Habitat, City Monitoring Branch, Policy Survey, 2011<br />
Cebu<br />
Gaziantep<br />
Shenzen<br />
Singapore<br />
All Sampled<br />
Asian Cities