14.01.2013 Views

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES 2012/2013 Prosperity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State of the World’s Cities <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>2013</strong><br />

SOME IMPEDIMENTS TO <strong>THE</strong> URBAN PROSPERITy<br />

Based on the UN-Habitat local expert survey, there are<br />

seven main impediments to urban prosperity, as follows:<br />

poor governance and weak institutions; corruption; lack<br />

of appropriate infrastructure; high incidence of slums and<br />

poverty; high costs of doing business; low levels of human<br />

capital; and high crime rates (Figure 3.1.2). The hard-won<br />

prosperity gains made by cities in terms of productivity,<br />

infrastructures, quality of life, equity, social inclusion and<br />

environmental sustainability can be jeopardized or eroded,<br />

either individually or collectively, by these impediments.<br />

Poor governance and weak institutions<br />

What this implies is that countries in Africa and Arab<br />

States must do more to improve urban governance and<br />

institutions. Indeed, in many developing countries, the<br />

institutions required for urban prosperity, if they exist, are<br />

weakly developed. Proper<br />

institutions are crucial<br />

Poor governance formal (Constitution,<br />

FACT and weak<br />

laws and regulations) and<br />

institutions act as major informal (social norms,<br />

impediments to higher<br />

customs and traditions)<br />

urban prosperity.<br />

rules that determine how<br />

people, organizations<br />

and firms make decisions<br />

POLICy<br />

The impact of<br />

poor governance<br />

and weak institutions on<br />

urban prosperity appears<br />

to be more pronounced in<br />

cities in Africa and Arabs<br />

States, where over 40 per<br />

cent of experts cite this<br />

factor as the single most<br />

important impediment.<br />

FACT<br />

Corruption is<br />

considered by local<br />

experts as the second most<br />

important hindrance to<br />

enhanced urban prosperity.<br />

FACT<br />

Corruption can<br />

be detrimental<br />

to urban prosperity in a<br />

variety of ways.<br />

of an economic, social<br />

political nature, maximize<br />

potentials and optimize<br />

resources. 25<br />

Sound institutions<br />

matter for the prosperity<br />

of cities, as they provide<br />

the superstructure that<br />

enables, or otherwise,<br />

underlying factors to<br />

operate and deliver a<br />

maximum of benefits<br />

to the largest possible<br />

majority of the population.<br />

Institutional inadequacies<br />

take the form of weak (if<br />

not altogether lacking)<br />

legal and institutional<br />

frameworks26 , disregard<br />

for the rule of law,<br />

poor enforcement of<br />

property rights, excessive<br />

98<br />

bureaucracy, and proliferation of corrupt practices among<br />

others. All these are incompatible with urban prosperity.<br />

Corruption<br />

Local experts surveyed by UN-Habitat unanimously concur<br />

that corruption is a major threat to the prosperity of cities.<br />

This is in line with the view that corruption is the single<br />

largest obstacle to development. 27 Corruption can be found<br />

operating on a grand scale, often penetrating the highest<br />

policy-making organs of government, including urban<br />

authorities, or take a petty sort of nature, involving everyday<br />

public and social interactions.<br />

Corruption acts a deterrent to direct (and even<br />

indirect) foreign investment, as it will influence foreign<br />

firms’ decisions to locate in a particular country or city.<br />

Corruption acts like a tax, only imposed for private instead<br />

of public benefit. 28 One of the reasons that foreign firms are<br />

attracted to cities such as Bridgetown (Barbados), Santiago<br />

(Chile), Gaborone (Botswana), Doha (Qatar), San Juan<br />

(Puerto Rico), St Louis (Mauritius), Kigali (Rwanda) or<br />

Victoria (Seychelles) is because they all located in countries<br />

with low levels of corruption.<br />

Corruption undermines the ability of city authorities to<br />

provide fair municipal services, as it distorts planning and<br />

allocation processes.<br />

Corruption is particularly evident in large-scale<br />

urban infrastructure projects, and distorts infrastructure<br />

spending in various ways. 29 It can increase public<br />

expenditure on new infrastructure, since such capital<br />

projects can be easily manipulated by politicians and highlevel<br />

officials to obtain bribes.<br />

Corruption can reduce the resources normally available<br />

to urban authorities for improved provision of basic services<br />

such as water, sanitation, education, health and recreation,<br />

which are all essential for urban prosperity and the<br />

achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, many<br />

of which are urban-related.<br />

Corruption can also result in shoddy delivery of urban<br />

services. When contractors offer bribes to secure contracts,<br />

they are likely to cut back and compromise on quality in<br />

order to recoup part or whole of the bribe offered.<br />

Inadequate infrastructure<br />

Cities with deficient infrastructure will be adversely affected<br />

on many fronts; they are less likely to be prosperous,<br />

sustainable or productive. For instance, inadequate water<br />

and sanitation facilities will lead to deterioration of the<br />

urban environment, increasing the disease burden of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!