- Page 1 and 2:
Kim Strandberg Studies of Politics
- Page 4:
PARTIES, CANDIDATES AND CITIZENS ON
- Page 7 and 8:
CIP Cataloguing in Publication Stra
- Page 9 and 10:
Jag vill även ta tillfället i akt
- Page 11 and 12:
C. Summary & Conclusions ..........
- Page 13 and 14:
List of tables Article I: Table 1.
- Page 16:
A. Introduction
- Page 19 and 20:
26; Römmele 2003, 9-11). Therefore
- Page 21 and 22:
these scholarly visions (e.g. Corra
- Page 23 and 24:
2003b; Gibson & Ward 2002). Regardi
- Page 25 and 26:
Some further comments regarding the
- Page 27 and 28:
for citizens’ participation and p
- Page 29 and 30:
providing the kind of structure for
- Page 31 and 32:
To further examine the central comp
- Page 33 and 34:
Scholars have noted that some of th
- Page 35 and 36:
• In the third article (Strandber
- Page 37 and 38:
References Barber, B. 1984. Strong
- Page 39 and 40:
Lusoli, W. 2005b. “The Internet a
- Page 42:
B. The articles
- Page 45 and 46:
Introduction Two specific theories
- Page 47 and 48:
proportional systems. It is therefo
- Page 49 and 50:
egulation of political advertising
- Page 51 and 52:
Because the study is case-oriented
- Page 53 and 54:
the discussion of the variable, the
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 1. Operationalizations of the
- Page 57 and 58:
There were no contradicting cases f
- Page 59 and 60:
dramatically if a different coding
- Page 61 and 62:
of democratic status and the usage
- Page 63 and 64:
References Altheide, D. & Snow, R.
- Page 65 and 66:
Norris, P. (2003) ‘Preaching to t
- Page 67 and 68:
Appendix B: studies associated with
- Page 69 and 70:
ABdE+AbdE = AdE BCdE+BcdE = BdE Fin
- Page 71 and 72: 1. Introduction Voter turnout in th
- Page 73 and 74: integration [9,10]. A study by Tiil
- Page 75 and 76: 3. Data and methodology Our focus o
- Page 77 and 78: provided the bulk of the sites and,
- Page 79 and 80: YLE, the state-owned Finnish Broadc
- Page 81 and 82: 4.4. The on-line candidates: a clos
- Page 83 and 84: 4.4.3. What kind of candidates did
- Page 85 and 86: sources during the campaign. The qu
- Page 87 and 88: The results presented hitherto are
- Page 89 and 90: ecome involved in their campaigns.
- Page 91 and 92: References [1] H. Schmitt, The Euro
- Page 93 and 94: Appendix A. Abbreviated coding temp
- Page 95 and 96: Introduction Party communication ha
- Page 97 and 98: pursuit of executive office, policy
- Page 99 and 100: 2001, 30; Pedersen & Saglie 2005, 3
- Page 101 and 102: and efforts into using the web for
- Page 103 and 104: finally, engaging communication 3.
- Page 105 and 106: Finally, concerning the informative
- Page 107 and 108: Nousiainen 1998, 55-59; Sundberg 19
- Page 109 and 110: sophistication index. These parties
- Page 111 and 112: (cf. Strom 1990, 570), and conseque
- Page 113 and 114: identified two groups of parties on
- Page 115 and 116: Notes: 1 As of November 16th 2005,
- Page 117 and 118: Kitchelt, H. 2001. ‘Partisan Comp
- Page 119 and 120: Appendix: Questionnaire scales Labo
- Page 121: Targeting of specific voter segment
- Page 125 and 126: Introduction “A seeming beneficia
- Page 127 and 128: egards to giving the outsiders an a
- Page 129 and 130: to the party total and usually stan
- Page 131 and 132: also free to purchase as much adver
- Page 133 and 134: not alter the underlying party- and
- Page 135 and 136: made by party personnel in each ele
- Page 137 and 138: weak effect for younger age found h
- Page 139 and 140: caution is due in interpreting this
- Page 141 and 142: campaign, the most information-rich
- Page 143 and 144: competitive candidate was also a si
- Page 145 and 146: underline the view stated by Margol
- Page 147 and 148: Notes 1 Source: http://www.nua.com/
- Page 149 and 150: Gibson, Rachel and Andrea Römmele
- Page 151 and 152: Appendix: The coding/scoring scheme
- Page 153 and 154: No information given (0); + 6 month
- Page 155 and 156: Introduction “Thus for the first
- Page 157 and 158: “Not only does this form of parti
- Page 159 and 160: Therefore, the internet is merely a
- Page 161 and 162: RQ3a: Are there differences in the
- Page 163 and 164: Table 1. The distribution (number a
- Page 165 and 166: The logic of the measure is quite s
- Page 167 and 168: Table 4. Average number of debaters
- Page 169 and 170: Table 5. Comparison of average numb
- Page 171 and 172: that politics is not the topic of c
- Page 173 and 174:
References Altheide, D. & Snow, R.
- Page 176:
C. Summary & Conclusions
- Page 179 and 180:
Furthermore, the method used in ass
- Page 181 and 182:
spur innovative and lively on-line
- Page 183 and 184:
long history of democracy, high cou
- Page 185 and 186:
Strandberg 2005). These articles ad
- Page 187 and 188:
economic patterns usually associate
- Page 189 and 190:
Political actors Normalization Equa
- Page 191 and 192:
Tentatively, supporting the push pe
- Page 193 and 194:
References Barber, B. 1984. Strong
- Page 195:
The internet has been argued to aff