19.01.2013 Views

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

would significantly enhance our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the individual-level effects of on-line<br />

political activity.<br />

The results of the study generally support the reinforcement theory. The activity<br />

on three out of four party-associated discussion boards is exceptionally low. However, the<br />

National Coalition Party forum boasts a higher level of activity than the other party<br />

forums. Keeping the optimistic visions inherent in the mobilization scenario in mind, the<br />

marginal activity noted on the Centre Party’s member forum is clearly worrisome.<br />

Although the supporters of the Centre Party are not probably the most active internet<br />

users in Finl<strong>and</strong>, it still comes as quite a surprise that not even these politically interested<br />

party members are participating in on-line discussions. Likewise, it also comes as a<br />

surprise that the socialist parties with a history as mass-parties, i.e. the Social Democratic<br />

Party <strong>and</strong> the Left Alliance, lack on-line discussion boards altogether. Concerning this,<br />

one plausible explanation is that the parties are wary of electronic discussions as these<br />

might not necessarily present a positive picture of the party. For instance, Str<strong>and</strong>berg<br />

(2003: 82) found that the messages posted to the now shut-down SDP forum, in general,<br />

were negative <strong>and</strong> critical towards the party <strong>and</strong> its politicians.<br />

The findings concerning the discussions’ liveliness <strong>and</strong> intensity generally add<br />

more support to the pessimistic views of electronic politics. Even though the NCP forum<br />

displayed debates that were livelier <strong>and</strong> more intense than on the other parties’ forums,<br />

the overall levels of liveliness <strong>and</strong> intensity were exceptionally low. There were little, or<br />

virtually no traits of debates with interaction <strong>and</strong> exchange of ideas between many<br />

debaters. Seemingly, then, the electronic debates’ ability to inspire <strong>and</strong> deepen citizens’<br />

political engagement seems limited.<br />

The examination of the number of debaters on the discussion boards provided<br />

more indications of reinforcement, or lack of mobilization, on all party-associated forums.<br />

There seems to be little interest for electronic political debates among the Finnish<br />

citizens, as evident from the fact that a mere maximum of eight citizens participated in<br />

91.7 % of all discussion threads. However, one must bear in mind that the scope of this<br />

study is nonetheless limited. Hence, several arenas for electronic political discussion,<br />

besides those of political parties, have not been studied. In theory, the majority of on-line<br />

political discussion in Finl<strong>and</strong> might take place in completely different areas than<br />

expected. Thus, the conclusions of this study should not be over-interpreted. The study<br />

did, however, provide an insight into one political discussion board not associated with<br />

any of the political parties. The findings of the comparison between this political forum<br />

<strong>and</strong> a non-political counterpart on the web portal jippi.fi, generally support the<br />

reinforcement theory. A greater number of citizens were engaged in livelier <strong>and</strong> more<br />

intense discussions on the non-political discussion board than on the political discussion<br />

board. Since the surrounding context for the two forums is identical, the findings indicate<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!