19.01.2013 Views

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 3. Engagement features by producer types. Figures are the percentage of sites<br />

including a specific feature.<br />

Feature<br />

C<strong>and</strong>idate<br />

(N=62)<br />

Party<br />

(N=11)<br />

Government<br />

(N=7)<br />

Producer type<br />

News<br />

Media<br />

(N=7)<br />

NGO/<br />

Labour<br />

(N=5)<br />

Other<br />

(N=5)<br />

All<br />

types<br />

(N=97)<br />

Contact<br />

Producer<br />

84 100 100 100 100 60 88<br />

Join/Become<br />

a Member<br />

23 82 0 0 60 0 27<br />

Register to<br />

Vote<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Get E-mail 7 0 0 0 0 0 4<br />

Donate 15 9 0 0 0 0 10<br />

Contribution<br />

to Forum<br />

7 0 29 14 0 20 8<br />

Offline<br />

Distribution<br />

3 18 0 0 0 0 4<br />

Send Links<br />

Public<br />

0 18 14 0 0 0 3<br />

Support<br />

Statement<br />

15 0 0 0 0 0 9<br />

E-<br />

Paraphernalia<br />

2 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />

Volunteer 18 0 0 0 0 0 11<br />

As Table 3 shows, the only engagement feature that all producer types frequently offered<br />

is the possibility to contact the site producer, usually by e-mail. Regarding the other<br />

features, there seems to be a dividing line between, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, the parties <strong>and</strong><br />

c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites <strong>and</strong>, on the other, the sites of the other four producer types (i.e.,<br />

government, news media, NGO/Labour, other). The latter group provided very few<br />

engagement features. <strong>On</strong> the parties’ <strong>and</strong>, in particular, c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites, a wider range of<br />

engagement features are prevalent. Thus, a vast majority of the parties’ sites provided<br />

opportunities for visitors to join/become member of the organization. Moreover, the<br />

parties’ sites provided features that encourage the site visitor to mobilize other voters, i.e.,<br />

by enabling visitors to send a link from the site to other voters <strong>and</strong> encouraging offline<br />

distribution of campaign material. The c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, primarily<br />

offered engagement opportunities that enable citizens to become involved in the<br />

campaign. Hence, 23 per cent of the sites provide opportunities to join/become members<br />

of the c<strong>and</strong>idates’ campaign organization. Moreover, 18 per cent of the sites encourage<br />

visitors to volunteer in the c<strong>and</strong>idates’ campaign. Furthermore, 15 per cent of the<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites enabled/encouraged visitors to donate money <strong>and</strong> to make public<br />

statements in support of the c<strong>and</strong>idates.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!