Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi
Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi
Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 3. Engagement features by producer types. Figures are the percentage of sites<br />
including a specific feature.<br />
Feature<br />
C<strong>and</strong>idate<br />
(N=62)<br />
Party<br />
(N=11)<br />
Government<br />
(N=7)<br />
Producer type<br />
News<br />
Media<br />
(N=7)<br />
NGO/<br />
Labour<br />
(N=5)<br />
Other<br />
(N=5)<br />
All<br />
types<br />
(N=97)<br />
Contact<br />
Producer<br />
84 100 100 100 100 60 88<br />
Join/Become<br />
a Member<br />
23 82 0 0 60 0 27<br />
Register to<br />
Vote<br />
0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Get E-mail 7 0 0 0 0 0 4<br />
Donate 15 9 0 0 0 0 10<br />
Contribution<br />
to Forum<br />
7 0 29 14 0 20 8<br />
Offline<br />
Distribution<br />
3 18 0 0 0 0 4<br />
Send Links<br />
Public<br />
0 18 14 0 0 0 3<br />
Support<br />
Statement<br />
15 0 0 0 0 0 9<br />
E-<br />
Paraphernalia<br />
2 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
Volunteer 18 0 0 0 0 0 11<br />
As Table 3 shows, the only engagement feature that all producer types frequently offered<br />
is the possibility to contact the site producer, usually by e-mail. Regarding the other<br />
features, there seems to be a dividing line between, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, the parties <strong>and</strong><br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites <strong>and</strong>, on the other, the sites of the other four producer types (i.e.,<br />
government, news media, NGO/Labour, other). The latter group provided very few<br />
engagement features. <strong>On</strong> the parties’ <strong>and</strong>, in particular, c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites, a wider range of<br />
engagement features are prevalent. Thus, a vast majority of the parties’ sites provided<br />
opportunities for visitors to join/become member of the organization. Moreover, the<br />
parties’ sites provided features that encourage the site visitor to mobilize other voters, i.e.,<br />
by enabling visitors to send a link from the site to other voters <strong>and</strong> encouraging offline<br />
distribution of campaign material. The c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, primarily<br />
offered engagement opportunities that enable citizens to become involved in the<br />
campaign. Hence, 23 per cent of the sites provide opportunities to join/become members<br />
of the c<strong>and</strong>idates’ campaign organization. Moreover, 18 per cent of the sites encourage<br />
visitors to volunteer in the c<strong>and</strong>idates’ campaign. Furthermore, 15 per cent of the<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates’ sites enabled/encouraged visitors to donate money <strong>and</strong> to make public<br />
statements in support of the c<strong>and</strong>idates.<br />
71